Children's meta-perceptions and meta-accuracy of acceptance and rejection by same-sex and other-sex peers

Authors


  • This research was supported in part by a grant from the University of Connecticut Research Foundation. Parts of this research were presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN, April 2001. We acknowledge Michael Whitcomb's contributions to this project, and we thank David Kenny and Sandra Graham for providing helpful comments on this work.

  •  Correspondence should be addressed to Amy D. Bellmore, Department of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, Box 951521, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1521; e-mail: bellmore@ucla.edu

Abstract

The goals of this study were to examine children's meta-perceptions and meta-accuracy of acceptance and rejection in the peer group, the degree to which these perceptions vary by perceiver sex and sex of the reference group, and the association between these perceptions and children's actual functioning in the peer group. Participants were 644 fourth-grade children. Meta-perceptions and meta-accuracy were derived from sociometric nominations of actual and perceived acceptance and rejection. Children more accurately perceived how they were seen by same-sex peers than how they were seen by other-sex peers. They also perceived more rejection than acceptance from other-sex peers. Meta-accuracy for rejection was low regardless of the sex of the reference group. Sex of the reference group significantly moderated the association between meta-perceptions and meta-accuracy of acceptance and rejection and children's actual peer relationships. These findings indicate the importance of examining these relatively understudied social cognitions in research with children and the importance of taking the sex of the reference group into account in future peer relations studies using peer nomination methods.

Ancillary