Lars Brink is Senior Fellow at the Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network (CATPRN). E-mail: email@example.com for correspondence. David Orden is Senior Research Fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA and Professor and Director of the Global Issues Initiative, Institute for Society, Culture and Environment, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, VA, USA. Giselle Datz is Assistant Professor at the School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Alexandria, VA, USA. We have benefitted from the earlier work of Fuzhi Cheng, Munisamy Gopinath and André Nassar and from comments of the participants in the IAMO Forum entitled “Will the ‘BRICs Decade’ Continue? – Prospects for Trade and Growth”, Halle, Germany, 23–24 June 2011.
BRIC Agricultural Policies Through a WTO Lens
Article first published online: 24 JAN 2013
© 2013 The Agricultural Economics Society
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume 64, Issue 1, pages 197–216, February 2013
How to Cite
Brink, L., Orden, D. and Datz, G. (2013), BRIC Agricultural Policies Through a WTO Lens. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64: 197–216. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12008
- Issue published online: 24 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 24 JAN 2013
- (Original submitted September 2011, revision received September 2012, accepted October 2012.)
- Russia WTO accession;
- WTO domestic support rules.
This article examines the agricultural policies of Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) through the prism of the disciplines on agricultural domestic support in the World Trade Organization (WTO). Although the BRIC are often grouped collectively as an emerging force in the world economy, divergent agricultural interests are reflected in different approaches towards agricultural policy both through international dispute settlement and notification of their own support. We examine the support notified to the WTO for verification of compliance with their legal commitments, which under the complex WTO rules often differs significantly from measurement of support in economic terms. We note the resulting difficulties of these disciplines in establishing limits on trade-distorting support. Implications of a Doha agreement are examined. Although the prospect of adoption of new Doha disciplines has become remote, the negotiated provisions are informative about the future policy space the BRIC sought to maintain. Russia’s domestic support commitments under its 2012 WTO accession extend the international disciplines but share the complexity of the other cases.