SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Michael J. Nelson, Ian Ostrander, Keeping Appointments: The Politics of Confirming United States Attorneys, Justice System Journal, 2016, 1

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Ian Ostrander, The Logic of Collective Inaction: Senatorial Delay in Executive Nominations, American Journal of Political Science, 2016, 60, 1
  3. 3
    G. E. Hollibaugh, Naive Cronyism and Neutral Competence: Patronage, Performance, and Policy Agreement in Executive Appointments, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2015, 25, 2, 341

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Jeffrey S. Peake, The Domestic Politics of US Treaty Ratification: Bilateral Treaties from 1949 to 2012, Foreign Policy Analysis, 2015, 11, 4
  5. 5
    Philip Habel, Daniel Bennett, Shane A. Gleason, Scott A. Comparato, The Implications of Salary for the Quality of Nominations to the Federal District Courts, 1964–2012, Justice System Journal, 2015, 36, 4, 323

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Gary E. Hollibaugh, The Political Determinants of Ambassadorial Appointments, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2015, 45, 3
  7. 7
    Ellen M. Key, Matthew J. Lebo, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015,

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Charles R. Shipan, Brooke Thomas Allen, Andrew Bargen, Choosing When to Choose: Explaining the Duration of Presidential Supreme Court Nomination Decisions, Congress & the Presidency, 2014, 41, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    David C. Nixon, InstitutionalConflict andPerceivedPropertyRights inAppointmentPolitics, Congress & the Presidency, 2014, 41, 2, 223

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Lucia Dalla Pellegrina, Laarni Escresa, Nuno Garoupa, Measuring Judicial Ideal Points in New Democracies: The Case of the Philippines, Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2014, 1, 01, 125

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    John R. Lott, ABA ratings: what do they really measure?, Public Choice, 2013, 156, 1-2, 139

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Matthew P. Hitt, Presidential Success in Supreme Court Appointments: Informational Effects and Institutional Constraints, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2013, 43, 4
  13. 13
    Michele L. Swers, Christine C. Kim, Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor: Gender and the Politics of Supreme Court Nominations, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2013, 34, 1, 23

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Udi Sommer, Representative Appointments: The Effect of Women's Groups in Contentious Supreme Court Confirmations, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2013, 34, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Jonathan Woon, Sarah Anderson, Political Bargaining and the Timing of Congressional Appropriations, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2012, 37, 4
  16. 16
    NICOLE ASMUSSEN, Female and Minority Judicial Nominees: President's Delight and Senators' Dismay?, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2011, 36, 4
  17. 17
    HEMANT SHARMA, JOHN M. SCHEB II, The Impact of Divided Government on the Supreme Court Appointment Process: An Assessment of Judicial Extremism, 1946-2009, Politics & Policy, 2011, 39, 6
  18. 18
    Michael H. Crespin, David W. Rohde, Dimensions, Issues, and Bills: Appropriations Voting on the House Floor, The Journal of Politics, 2010, 72, 04, 976

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Charles R. Shipan, Partisanship, Ideology, and Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2008, 5, 1
  20. 20
    Nancy Scherer, Brandon L. Bartels, Amy Steigerwalt, Sounding the Fire Alarm: The Role of Interest Groups in the Lower Federal Court Confirmation Process, The Journal of Politics, 2008, 70, 04, 1026

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    David M. Primo, Sarah A. Binder, Forrest Maltzman, Who Consents? Competing Pivots in Federal Judicial Selection, American Journal of Political Science, 2008, 52, 3
  22. 22
    Chris W. Bonneau, Thomas H. Hammond, Forrest Maltzman, Paul J. Wahlbeck, Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court, American Journal of Political Science, 2007, 51, 4
  23. 23
    PAMELA C. CORLEY, Avoiding Advice and Consent: Recess Appointments and Presidential Power, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2006, 36, 4
  24. 24
    Frederick J. Boehmke, Daniel S. Morey, Megan Shannon, Selection Bias and Continuous-Time Duration Models: Consequences and a Proposed Solution, American Journal of Political Science, 2006, 50, 1
  25. 25
    Lee Epstein, René Lindstädt, Jeffrey A. Segal, Chad Westerland, The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees, Journal of Politics, 2006, 68, 2