Get access

Sagehood and Supererogation in the Analects

Authors

  • Timothy Connolly

    Corresponding author
    1. East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania
    • TIM CONNOLLY, Associate Professor, Philosophy and Religious Studies Department, East Stroudsburg University. Specialties: ancient Greek philosophy, classical Chinese philosophy. E-mail: tconnolly@po-box.esu.edu

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The Confucian ethical tradition emphasizes unceasing progress toward the goal of sagehood, and so it is generally opposed to the idea of supererogation, as this implies that we may be satisfied with attaining some sub-sagely level of morality. The one possible exception to this anti-supererogationist stance, however, turns out to be Confucius himself, who in the Analects appears to downplay sagehood and instead focus on the goal of junzi. Yet given that Confucius stresses ceaseless cultivation as much as anyone else in the tradition, this leaves us with a puzzle about the sage's status in the Analects. Is sagehood supererogatory?

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary