Get access
Advertisement

Third Molar Development: Evaluation of Nine Tooth Development Registration Techniques for Age Estimations

Authors


  • Presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, February 21–26, 2011, in Chicago, IL.

Additional information and reprint requests:

Guy Willems, Ph.D.

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry

Forensic Odontology Department

Kapucijnenvoer 7

Leuven B-3000

Belgium

E-mail: guy.willems@med.kuleuven.be

Abstract

Multiple third molar development registration techniques exist. Therefore the aim of this study was to detect which third molar development registration technique was most promising to use as a tool for subadult age estimation. On a collection of 1199 panoramic radiographs the development of all present third molars was registered following nine different registration techniques [Gleiser, Hunt (GH); Haavikko (HV); Demirjian (DM); Raungpaka (RA); Gustafson, Koch (GK); Harris, Nortje (HN); Kullman (KU); Moorrees (MO); Cameriere (CA)]. Regression models with age as response and the third molar registration as predictor were developed for each registration technique separately. The MO technique disclosed highest R2 (F 51%, M 45%) and lowest root mean squared error (F 3.42 years; M 3.67 years) values, but differences with other techniques were small in magnitude. The amount of stages utilized in the explored staging techniques slightly influenced the age predictions.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary