SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Escherichia coli O157:H7;
  • ecology;
  • environment;
  • water;
  • survival;
  • free-living protozoa

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Since its first description in 1982, the zoonotic life-threatening Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 has emerged as an important food- and water-borne pathogen that causes diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in humans. In the last decade, increases in E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks were associated with environmental contamination in water and through fresh produce such as green leaves or vegetables. Both intrinsic (genetic adaptation) and extrinsic factors may contribute and help E. coli O157:H7 to survive in adverse environments. This makes it even more difficult to detect and monitor food and water safety for public health surveillance. E. coli O157:H7 has evolved in behaviors and strategies to persist in the environment.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), in particular serotype O157:H7, is a highly pathogenic subset of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) that causes gastrointestinal illnesses ranging from aqueous and bloody diarrhea to hemorrhagic colitis in humans (Werner et al., 1990; Karmali, 2009). Hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) is a potentially life-threatening complication that can arise from STEC infection. The production of Shiga toxins (Stx) is a key factor contributing to the development of HUS (Griffin & Tauxe, 1991). In addition to Stx, a type III protein secretion system (T3SS), through which the pathogen translocates effector proteins into host cells, causes attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions (Karmali, 2004). The genes required for A/E lesions are encoded within a chromosomal pathogenicity island named the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE; McDaniel et al., 1995). The LEE encodes T3SS, an adhesin (the intimin Eae) and its receptor (Tir) required for intimate adherence to epithelial cells, and effector proteins translocated through the T3SS that are injected into the host cell (Naylor et al., 2005). The genome sequences of O157:H7 strains isolated from the major outbreaks share about 75% of a highly conserved sequence backbone of the E. coli chromosome (Hayashi et al., 2001; Perna et al., 2001). The remaining O157:H7-specific sequences are named O islands, most of which are horizontally transferred and include other virulence genes in addition to stx and LEE genes (Croxen & Finlay, 2010).

Cattle are recognized as the main reservoir for E. coli O157:H7 resulting in zoonotic transmission by consumption of undercooked meat or dairy products inadequately pasteurized and contaminated with bovine feces (Jay et al., 2004; Kassenborg et al., 2004). Here, we review the established and putative environmental behaviors of E. coli O157:H7 and present potential reservoirs and ecological niches where EHEC may persist in the environment.

Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other serotypes of the STEC group are naturally acquired infections that have been detected in a wide spectrum of animal species (cattle, sheep, goat, deer, moose, swine, horse, dog, cat, pigeon, chicken, turkey, gull) sometimes even with considerable prevalence (Beutin et al., 1993; Wieler et al., 1996). In particular, cattle have been identified as major reservoirs of STEC strains that are highly virulent in the human host (e.g. EHEC O157:H7). However, in contrast to the human host, most STEC infections of animals are clinically asymptomatic (Hancock et al., 2001; La Ragione et al., 2009). Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections in humans often occur through consumption of contaminated food products derived from cattle. Analysis of 90 confirmed E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks that occurred between 1982 and 2006 in Canada, Great Britain, Ireland, Japan, Scandinavia, and USA, indicated that 20% of cases were the result of secondary spread (Snedeker et al., 2009). The authors found that the source of transmission was food and dairy products in 54%, water and environment in c. 10%, and animal contact in c. 8%. Consumption of any food or beverage contaminated with animal manure/feces can result in disease. For this reason, food sources causing illness secondary to E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have changed in the past several years. Interestingly, fresh greens, fruits, and vegetables have become important sources of human infection. In the USA, E. coli O157:H7 infections from contaminated fruits and vegetables increased from 11% to 41% from 1998 to 2007 (Xicohtencatl-Cortes et al., 2009). Contamination of fresh produce was associated with fecal contamination in agricultural irrigation water or runoff.

Along the same line, the recent enterohemorrhagic E. coli strain O104:H4 was implicated in the spring 2011 European outbreak, and its possible source was associated with raw vegetables (fenugreek seeds or sprouts) consumed raw or undercooked (King et al., 2012). It was difficult to establish the link between vehicle, source, and cause of this STEC outbreak. This raised the importance of epidemiological and microbiological investigations in food and in the environment.

The global community has been experiencing food-associated outbreaks of non-O157 STEC for nearly two decades. As a result, increasing scientific evidence supports that E. coli non-O157 strains have a high prevalence in meat products and are equally capable of causing severe food-borne illness outbreaks (EFSA, 2011). Hussein (2007) reviewed reported levels of non-O157 STEC in whole cattle carcasses, ground beef, retail beef cuts, and sausage and found 1.7–58%, 2.4–30%, 11.4–49.6%, and 17–49.2%, respectively (Hussein, 2007). In Table 1, the reports of non-O157 STEC in foods, associated with human infections from numerous countries, reveal wide variation in prevalence estimates and in the major non-O157 serogroups reported (Hussein & Bollinger, 2005; Hussein & Sakuma, 2005; Erickson & Doyle, 2007; EFSA, 2012).

Table 1. Incidence of STEC and the percentage of non-O157 in food related to human infections in different area around the world
Country/Geographic areaEIR of STEC% of STEC Non-O157Major non-O157 serogroupsaReferences
  1. EIR, estimated incidence rate.

  2. a

    Major non-O157 serogroups.

  3. b

    Data based on 25 reporting countries from the European Union (EU).

Australia0.4c. 42O26, O111Vally et al. (2012)
European Unionb1.1c. 48O26, O91, O103, O111, O113, O128, O145, O146EFSA (2011)
Canada3.0–6.0< 15O26, O91, O103, O111, O121Thompson et al. (2005) and Gill & Gill (2010)
Japan2.0–3.0c. 40O26, O111, O121, O103, O145Kudoh et al. (1994) and Sakuma et al. (2006)
Argentina10.4–12.2c. 40O8, O26, O113, O145, O174Rivas et al. (2006) and Masana et al. (2011)
USA1.04–1.2c. 30O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145Brooks et al. (2005) and Scallan et al. (2011)

STEC non-O157 are less likely than O157 STEC to cause outbreaks or severe disease, and because they are more challenging diagnostically, many non-O157 infections may not be investigated fully, and their sources may thus remain undetermined. The incidence of non-O157 STEC declaration has increased as laboratories got involved in testing for those strains (Gould, 2009; Gould et al., 2009; Stigi et al., 2012). It is possible that the occurrence of non-O157 outbreaks is due to environmental persistence (Bolton et al., 2011).

Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreaks related to consumption of contaminated water or to the use of surface water for recreational purposes have been reported (Licence et al., 2001; Olsen et al., 2002; Bruneau et al., 2004). In 1999, people became sick after drinking contaminated water in Washington County, New York, and swimming in contaminated water in Clark County, Washington. The outbreak in Walkerton, Canada (May 2000), related to consumption of drinking water that was contaminated by feces caused 2300 disease cases (Hrudey et al., 2003). Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter jejuni were identified as the main pathogens responsible for these disease cases, and E. coli O157:H7 was responsible for seven deaths (Hrudey et al., 2003). One factor explaining this contamination is the impact of climate. Indeed, surface water bodies can become contaminated by E. coli O157:H7 after a heavy rainfall or snowmelt, causing sewers to overflow or animal feces and manure to mix into surface water (Bruce et al., 2003). Also, some human-to-human contamination cases were reported due to the presence of E. coli O157:H7 in water such as public pools or lakes (Bruce et al., 2003; Varma et al., 2003). Persons with diarrhea, especially children after shedding or changing soiled diapers, can contaminate recreational waters, and infection could occur by bathing and/or swallowing (Williams et al., 1997; Bruce et al., 2003; Varma et al., 2003; Lee & Greig, 2008). Outbreaks associated with non-O157 STEC strains through water and produce have been documented (Doyle & Kaspar, 2010). Some strains of non-O157 STEC have been reported to survive in untreated well water for several months (Watterworth et al., 2006). Persistence might be underestimated and could be comparable with O157.

How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Pathogenic E. coli strains can survive in open environments. The ability to use nutrients and to attach to surfaces plays a crucial role in their survival in open environments. Escherichia coli O157:H7 is found in soil, manure, and irrigation water or contaminated seeds. Also, it may colonize the interior of plants such as radish, lettuce, and internal plant compartments (Itoh et al., 1998; Solomon et al., 2002ab). This makes it difficult to remove or kill these germs by washing and/or disinfection. Moreover, E. coli O157:H7 may be introduced into the food chain by splashing during rainfall or irrigation (Natvig et al., 2002). Thus, from contaminated consumable products and the transfer to other products during food processing and packaging, the organism can be disseminated in the food production chain.

Escherichia coli from livestock feces is known to survive on grass pasture for at least 5 months, affording opportunity for E. coli O157:H7 to be recycled by animals (Avery et al., 2004). Furthermore, the immediate environment of the animal and its feeding and drinking water are important sources of E. coli O157:H7 infection of cattle (reviewed in Fairbrother & Nadeau, 2006). The risk factors for carriage and infection of cattle are age, weaning, shipping, season, and feed composition and the bacteria's ability to persist in the farm environment for months (Fairbrother & Nadeau, 2006). Thus, E. coli O157:H7 represents an underestimated environmental risk.

Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Bacteria constitute the most successful form of life in environmental habitats. This is due to the ability to respond to environmental stimuli by phenotypic plasticity. In their ecosystem cycle, bacteria like E. coli O157:H7 are subjected to fluctuations in environmental conditions in soils and water. Viability and growth of bacteria depends primarily on availability of essential nutrients including organic carbon, phosphate (P), and nitrogen (Peterson et al., 2005). However, E. coli O157:H7 survives even at low density in oligotrophic environments such as surface water or groundwater that may be used as a raw water source for drinking water. This may be in river water containing low concentrations, 0.1−0.7 mg L−1, of organic carbon (Leclerc, 2003).

The presence of E. coli O157:H7 in aquatic environments is the common denominator linking diverse transient habitats and transmission to animals and humans. Therefore, it appears essential to understand the aquatic ecology of E. coli O157:H7. This section highlights the adaptation of E. coli O157:H7 in aquatic environments and analyzes its survival and growth in sessile biofilm state and unfavorable conditions that support a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state and free planktonic cells in water that may promote dissemination.

Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Various studies have reported that survival times of E. coli O157:H7 strains in aquatic environments vary importantly, ranging from 2 weeks to over 10 months (Warburton et al., 1998; McGee et al., 2002). It is thus important to attempt to identify the factors responsible for its survival rate. Many factors, individual or combined, may influence the pathogen's survival such as the temperature, the bacterial cell numbers, strain variation, oxidative stress, nutrient availability, and the substrate type or source.

Unlike some Gram-positive bacteria that respond to starvation by producing spores or cysts, E. coli O157:H7, a nonsporulating bacterium, might respond more by an altered physiological or metabolic state instead of developing resistant structural modifications. On the other hand, E. coli growing under nutrient-sufficient conditions (i.e. animal feces or manure) accumulates reserve carbon sources that can be stored for use in nutrient-poor environments (Morita, 1997). Indeed, when nutrient conditions in aquatic habitats are unfavorable, E. coli O157:H7 might reduce cell size, thereby increasing its surface/volume ratio and allowing more efficient uptake of poorly available nutrients. This physiological state resulting from an insufficient amount of nutrients is known as the starvation–survival state (Burgess, 1998). In this state, E. coli has evolved strategies to acclimate rapidly to surrounding environmental changes. The adaptive response begins by activation of enzymes required to catabolize available nutrients (Tao et al., 1999). After that, E. coli may increase its production of toxins or antibiotics, to promote killing or invading of other cells in the environment (Miller et al., 1989; Martin, 2004). Finally, the bacterium switches to a survival state, which enhances its resistance to many stresses and its ability to remain viable during long periods without nutrients (Siegele & Kolter, 1992).

Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Escherichia coli O157:H7 may survive and even grow in sterile freshwater at low carbon concentrations (Vital et al., 2008). Bacteria respond to specific nutrient stresses by producing transport systems with increased affinities for the nutrients most easily exploited, and then, they express transport and metabolic systems for alternative nutrient sources. Thus, these bacteria may be able to escape starvation by more efficient scavenging of a preferred nutrient or by using another, relatively more abundant source.

When E. coli O157:H7 is starved or stressed, cells enter into a general stress response phase (Peterson et al., 2005). At this point, the production of RpoS orchestrates the transcription of a series of overlapping networks of genes responsible for the E. coli general stress response (Hengge-Aronis, 2002). RpoS competes with the housekeeping sigma factors to direct a core RNA polymerase in the transcription of specific gene subsets, switching on the stress metabolisms to prepare the bacteria to resist multiple environmental stresses including starvation (Lange & Hengge-Aronis, 1991). High osmolarity, fluctuations in temperature, low pH, and low growth rate also induce the RpoS response in E. coli cells (Bearson et al., 1996; Muffler et al., 1996, 1997; Ihssen & Egli, 2004). Escherichia coli O157:H7 was found to be more acid resistant than generic E. coli strains (Diez-Gonzalez & Russell, 1997). Acid tolerance varies among strains (Lin et al., 1995). Oh et al. (2009), reported significantly higher tolerance to acetic acid of E. coli O157:H7 strains from environmental sources including water and bovine feces as compared with human outbreak-related strains. In addition, it has been shown that E. coli O157:H7 rpoS deletion impaired expression of genes responsible for stress response including gadA (part of glutamate-dependent acid resistance system 2) and ler (LEE-encoded regulator; Dong & Schellhorn, 2009).The importance of rpoS in aquatic environments is also supported by the decreased survival of E. coli rpoS mutant in stationary phase in sea water (Rozen & Belkin, 2001).

Growth and survival of E. coli in open environments is often restricted by the availability of nutrients and energy sources. However, in surface waters, viable E. coli O157:H7 was detected over a 2-month period, in spite of a decline in the cell numbers (Avery et al., 2008). Regarding E. coli O157:H7, the dynamics of gene expression in a transient habitat such as surface water remain underexplored. Recently, it has been shown that, even as the population of E. coli O157:H7 declined, some cells survived in sterile stream water for up to 234 days (Duffitt et al., 2011). In this study, E. coli O157:H7 in natural sterile water triggered a stress response metabolism and DNA repair mechanisms indicating that bacteria remained active. However, no variations were reported concerning expression of virulence genes. In contrast, in another study, it was found that the gene expression response of E. coli O157:H7 to a growth transition in minimal glucose medium triggered expression of genes located on pathogenicity islands and toxin-converting bacteriophages (Bergholz et al., 2007). It is possible that gene expression could vary considerably between adaptations to growth in minimal glucose medium compared with survival in water.

Phosphate is a highly sought after resource. Once used, it is often a limiting nutrient in environments, and its availability may govern the rate of growth of organisms. This is generally true of freshwater environments (Doering et al., 1995; Correll, 1999; Paytan & McLaughlin, 2007). In most environments, when inorganic phosphate (Pi) availability becomes limiting (< 4 μM), the Pho-regulon is activated (VanBogelen et al., 1996; Lamarche et al., 2008). Such a global regulatory system permits an optimal adaptive response and the efficient use of phosphate under Pi-limited conditions, which may lead to survival of pathogenic E. coli under phosphate-limiting conditions. In addition to playing an important role in virulence, the Pho-regulon may therefore also contribute to persistence of pathogenic E. coli in the environment (Crepin et al., 2011). More recently, Yoshida et al. identified novel Pho-regulon genes within specific O157 islands that are not localized in the backbone region shared with commensal E. coli. They showed that some of those genes are not related to Pi metabolism or utilization. This suggests that in response to environmental Pi stress, the Pho-regulon regulates genes involved not only in Pi homeostasis but also in other functions of E. coli O157:H7 (Yoshida et al., 2012).

Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Some strains of E. coli O157:H7 form biofilms on both biotic and abiotic surfaces outside the host such as stainless steel, glass, and polystyrene (Dewanti & Wong, 1995; Ryu et al., 2004; Ryu & Beuchat, 2005; Torres et al., 2005; Rivas et al., 2007). The genetic mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 biofilm formation is a complex process and is linked to the production of curli, long polar fimbriae, elements encoded by genes carried by O island OI-1, cellulose, and colonic acid (Torres et al., 2002; Ryu & Beuchat, 2005; Uhlich et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2007, 2011; Saldana et al., 2009; Allison et al., 2012). Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilm formation is also linked to the expression of some virulence genes including gene on the virulence plasmid pO157 (Puttamreddy et al., 2010). Additionally, intercellular signal molecules, such as autoinducer-2 and indole, are also involved in E. coli O157:H7 biofilm formation (Lee et al., 2007; Bansal et al., 2008; Yoon & Sofos, 2008). Escherichia coli O157:H7 uses the T3SS, flagella, and the pilus curli to attach and colonize surfaces (plant stomata and internal tissues), which constitute the first step of biofilm formation (Xicohtencatl-Cortes et al., 2009; Berger et al., 2010; Saldana et al., 2011). Growth of E. coli O157:H7 in protected biofilms proved to be a great advantage in open environments. In diverse habitats, bacteria within biofilms are notably resistant to bacteriophages and to free-living amoeboid predators (Costerton et al., 1995).

Escherichia coli O157:H7 represents a persistent contamination from both the industry sector and throughout its ecological cycle (Fig. 1). The shedding of E. coli O157:H7 ranges from 102 to 105 CFU g−1 of feces in cattle (Campbell et al., 2001) and where they can persist and be recycled in the farm environment, soil and water (Mead & Griffin, 1998; McGee et al., 2002). Regardless of whether the water habitat is oligotrophic surface water or groundwater, it should be viewed as an environmental source of E. coli O157:H7. Considering all, in their planktonic forms, environmental E. coli O157:H7 could be present in a variety of ecosystems, and when nutrient conditions become favorable, phenotypic flexibility allows them to form biofilms. Furthermore, it is now established that the biofilm mode of growth is predominant in aquatic ecosystems, as planktonic populations have been shown to constitute < 0.1% of the total microbial community.

image

Figure 1. Illustration depicting the ecological habitat and transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a global ecosystem. (1) On-farm cattle are the main reservoir for E. coli O157:H7 and may contaminate its immediate environment (feedlot) and sewage through cattle manure. Consumption of contaminated animal products (meat and dairy) is the main route of transmission to humans. Also, E. coli O157:H7 animal feces (102–105 CFU g−1), through the use of manure, may contaminate plants, allowing the pathogen to also enter the food chain. (2) Water can be contaminated by the animals' immediate environment and manure deposited on lands, sometimes after a heavy rainfall. Furthermore, soils contaminated with sewage waste and overflowing of sewers are causes of contaminated water. This route may then lead to contamination of plants. Also, soils and water containing the free-living protozoa may serve as vectors for E. coli O157:H7. (3) Contaminated surface water bodies are a source of human infection through recreational water activities, while groundwater is the raw water source for human consumption. (4) Human-to-human oro-fecal transmission is another potential route of E. coli O157:H7 infection. The human-to-human transmission could occur directly or indirectly through contamination of water by infected humans in recreational waters.

Download figure to PowerPoint

While there is still no clear link between biofilm formation and the presence or survival of E. coli O157:H7 in water, some studies showed that E. coli O157:H7 persists in water obtained from bottom-shore sediments (Czajkowska et al., 2004). Interestingly, it has been shown that when growing in biofilm, E. coli O157:H7 increased its retention and survival in the effluent through a bench-scale sand aquifer system (Wang et al., 2011). Also, in slaughter plants, the biofilm mode increases the persistence and acid tolerance of E. coli O157:H7 in liquid meat wastes (Skandamis et al., 2009). Furthermore, E. coli O157:H7 persists in soils around farms and livestock production and can resist to fumigation. It has been suggested that chemical fumigation that decreases the microbial diversity would favor E. coli O157:H7 (Ibekwe & Ma, 2011). Thus, the microbial species diversity participates in the environmental protection of E. coli O157:H7.

In these wet or dry surfaces, biofilms could provide an ideal microenvironment for the establishment of syntrophic relationships in which E. coli O157:H7 would depend on other bacterial populations to utilize specific substrates, typically for energy production. In fact, it has been shown that non-biofilm-forming E. coli O157:H7 strains are retained on solid surfaces associated with biofilms generated by companion strains (Uhlich et al., 2010).

Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

There is little information regarding the behavior and metabolic status of E. coli O157 in environmental water sources. However, some survival studies have used culture-based methods that rely on sampling of environmental material, followed by plating on selective media, such as cefixime and potassium tellurite containing sorbitol MacConkey agar (Bergholz et al., 2007). Escherichia coli O157:H7 cells in a ‘dormant’ state, also called VBNC, are still alive and demonstrate very low levels of metabolic activity and are not easily recovered on standard laboratory media (Oliver, 2005).

The VBNC state can be triggered by stress conditions in surface water that are imposed by low temperature or toxic metals (Klein & Alexander, 1986). However, the occurrence of the VBNC state in enteric bacteria is highly disputed by some reports, while others suggest it does occur in E. coli O157:H7 maintained in water and under saline conditions or in cattle manure and slurry (Bogosian et al., 1998; Wang & Doyle, 1998; Makino et al., 2000; Semenov et al., 2007, 2009). These findings showed significantly higher numbers of the organisms by direct microscopic counts when compared with plating on a selective medium, which indicated the prevalence of dormant cells in the total E. coli O157 population. The use of bioluminescence such as a lux marker system, which indicates the energy status of the cell, provides an alternative way to assess the viability of bacteria including VBNC cells (Ritchie et al., 2003).

Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Escherichia coli O157:H7 in surface waters constitutes a potential threat to human health through either drinking or ingestion during recreational activities. Currently, water contamination detection is based on standard guidelines that rely on microbial indicator concentrations of thermo-tolerant coliforms and enterococci (Wade et al., 2006). Still, there are no established correlations between the prevalence and concentration of these fecal indicators of contamination and the presence of E. coli O157:H7 (Sugumar et al., 2008; Duris et al., 2009). For this reason, quantitative PCR of virulence genes such as genes stx and eae represents a more targeted detection method. However, PCR-assay sensitivity can be limited by low E. coli O157:H7 abundance in samples (< 100 cells mL−1; Dharmasiri et al., 2010). Pre-enrichment of samples is used to improve sensitivity and circumvent the limitation of PCR assays. However, further studies are needed to interpret, for example, the presence of stx genes in water samples. In fact, stx genes are carried by the temperate-like phage. The presence of stx cannot be directly correlated with intact or VBNC STEC as stx phages can be released from lysed cells in the environment.

Interestingly, new methods are developed to detect E. coli O157:H7 from aquatic environments. Using an anti-O157 antibody-modified microfluidic chip permits the specific enrichment of E. coli O157 including VBNC (Dharmasiri et al., 2010). Another method involves the concentration of bacterial cells by filtration of water samples on a low-protein-binding membrane (polyvinylidene difluoride hydrophilic membrane) followed by direct extraction of the total RNA and specific RT-PCR amplification for rfbE for O157 antigen and fliC for H7 flagellin and then electronic microarray detection of E. coli O157:H7 (Liu et al., 2008).

Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

Over the last several decades, the importance of protozoa in soil, sewage, and water ecosystems and their role in controlling microbial populations has been widely acknowledged (Barker & Brown, 1994). Protozoa are widely distributed in water, soils, and effluents (Rodriguez-Zaragoza, 1994). They are likely to constitute an important environmental reservoir for transmission of Ecoli O157:H7 and other pathogens. Bacterial pathogens including Vibrio, Legionella, Mycobacteria, enteropathogenic E. coli, and the meningitis-causing E. coli strain K1 multiply and/or survive within protozoa (King et al., 1988; Werner et al., 1990; Barker & Brown, 1994; Fields, 1996; Steinert et al., 1998; Alsam et al., 2006; Huws et al., 2008). Escherichia coli O157 and non-O157 strains have been shown to survive within the environmental protozoa Acanthamoeba polyphaga and Acanthamoeba castellanii (King et al., 1988; Barker et al., 1999; Carruthers et al., 2010).

In addition to enhanced environmental survival, bacterial co-habitation with protozoa could induce adaptative changes in bacteria (King et al., 1988; Barker et al., 1993). Furthermore, we recently observed that the co-culture of E. coli O157:H7 with A. castellanii increased bacterial persistence over 3 weeks (Chekabab et al., 2012). In addition, there was a transient internalization and intracellular survival that increased in an isogenic mutant that did not produce Stx. Carruthers et al. (2010) showed an increased expression of virulence gene expression such as genes encoding Stx, LEE, and non-LEE T3SS effectors when Ecoli O157 was co-cultured with A. castellanii. This suggests that EHEC virulence factors may contribute to persistence and survival during interactions with amoebae. The ability of E. coli O157:H7 to enter and invade mammalian cells such as bovine mammary cells as well as also human macrophages was also observed (Matthews et al., 1997; Poirier et al., 2008; Etienne-Mesmin et al., 2011). Moreover, it is noticeable that amoebae and human macrophages share morphological and functional similarities, especially in their phagocytic activity and parallel mechanisms in their interactions with many bacterial pathogens (Yan et al., 2004; Siddiqui & Khan, 2012). Consequently, amoebae have been suggested to be a key step in the evolution of environmental bacteria to become human pathogens. Thus, Acanthamoeba may provide a useful model to study EHEC pathogenesis and to understand their immune evasion mechanisms.

Lainhart et al. (2009), found that Stx-encoding bacteria killed the ciliate protozoa using the holotoxin Stx as an antipredator weapon. Other studies have shown that the presence of Stx-encoding prophage augmented the fitness of E. coli in co-culture with the ciliate protozoa (Steinberg & Levin, 2007). These authors found that the ratio of Stx+ to Stx− bacteria increased after 3 days' co-culture with Tetrahymena thermophila that belong to ciliates protozoa present in ruminants gut. In contrast, other investigators did not observe any advantage or disadvantage of Stx lysogenic phage with the rumen protozoa (Burow et al., 2005). Thus, the contribution of Stx to bacterial survival when facing a protozoan seems to be variable depending on the conditions of the challenge and the protozoan models used in the co-culture assay.

There is growing concern about the survival of pathogens in sewage and waste effluents because it is known that Ecoli O157:H7 can survive in cattle manure slurry for at least several weeks (LeJeune et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2009). Protozoa present in these effluents could provide a protective niche for pathogens such as Ecoli O157:H7 (King et al., 1988). The role of protozoa in the survival of Ecoli O157:H7 in the natural environment has been less studied. Soils contaminated with organic matter and sewage waste contain greatly increased numbers of protozoa such as Acanthamoebae (Rodriguez-Zaragoza, 1994). It is possible that Ecoli O157:H7 in soil and slurry could be preyed on by free-living protozoa then serving as vectors for the spread of this pathogen. This is especially true if the bacteria are able to survive within cysts (the resistant forms of amoeba) as has been shown for Legionella pneumophila, Vibrio cholerae, and Mycobacterium avium (Steinert et al., 1998; Brown & Barker, 1999). Bacteria within amoeba cysts could be dispersed by aerosol transmission. Grazing cattle would ingest protozoa in silage and grass, and the ingested protozoa containing bacterial pathogens such as E. coli O157 could also be a route of transmission to cattle.

Different species belonging to the three protozoan groups (flagellates, ciliates, and amoebae) have been isolated from fresh green products found in the supermarket (i.e. spinach and lettuce). Gourabathini et al. (2008), demonstrated that those protozoa can ingest bacterial pathogen including E. coli O157:H7 and S. Enterica and then produce vesicles containing intact bacteria. Thus, the presence of protozoa on leafy vegetables and their sequestration of enteric bacteria in vesicles indicate that they may play an important role in the ecology of E. coli O157:H7 on fresh green products.

Conclusion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

In Fig. 1, we present a global view of the ecology and potential source reservoirs of E. coli O157:H7. This pathogen has shown the ability to survive in many adverse conditions. In addition to its capacity to cause infection to humans through consumption of contaminated foods, E. coli O157:H7 is able to survive in water, making this pathogenic bacterium an environmental threat to humans. The bacteria may enter a starvation and survival state allowing it to adapt and persist in low-nutrient environments such as water. Furthermore, E. coli O157:H7 has been shown to survive within environmental protozoa; this could contribute to its persistence. However, the distribution of this bacterium in the environment and the increasing reports of different routes of transmission make it difficult to set up efficient strategies to prevent contamination. There is a need to include environmental monitoring as a surveillance method for EHEC where such infections are problematic worldwide. Information collection and sampling methods should be standardized to more clearly understand the ecology of this environmental pathogen. This could lead to rational development of preventative measures to limit its presence in environments that may lead to increased risk of contamination of water, soil, and animals and transmission and infection of humans.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References

We thank Judith Kashul for editing of the manuscript and Aude Demengeon for the design of Figure 1. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Fonds de la recherche du Québec en nature et technologies to J.H. (FRQNT PT165375) and (RGPIN-25120) and C. M. D (RGPIN-250129-07) and a studentship to S. M. C. from Fonds CRIP (FRQNT Regroupements stratégiques 111946). The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Escherichia coli O157:H7: an emerging food- and water-borne pathogen
  5. How E. coli O157:H7 persists in natural ecological niches
  6. Factors involved in environmental persistence of E. coli O157:H7
  7. Aquatic E. coli O157:H7 – a starvation–survival lifestyle
  8. Carbon and phosphate stress responses of aquatic E. coli O157:H7
  9. Environmental E. coli O157:H7 and biofilm formation
  10. Cellular quiescence: a possible mechanism of E. coli O157:H7 survival in water
  11. Aquatic detection and isolation of E. coli O157:H7: an epidemiological challenge
  12. Interaction with protozoa: a possible persistence strategy for E. coli O157:H7
  13. Conclusion
  14. Acknowledgements
  15. References
  • Allison SE, Silphaduang U, Mascarenhas M, Konczy P, Quan Q, Karmali M & Coombes BK (2012) Novel repressor of Escherichia coli O157:H7 motility encoded in the putative fimbrial cluster OI-1. J Bacteriol 194: 53435352.
  • Alsam S, Jeong SR, Sissons J, Dudley R, Kim KS & Khan NA (2006) Escherichia coli interactions with Acanthamoeba: a symbiosis with environmental and clinical implications. J Med Microbiol 55: 689694.
  • Avery SM, Moore A & Hutchison ML (2004) Fate of Escherichia coli originating from livestock faeces deposited directly onto pasture. Lett Appl Microbiol 38: 355359.
  • Avery LM, Williams AP, Killham K & Jones DL (2008) Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in waters from lakes, rivers, puddles and animal-drinking troughs. Sci Total Environ 389: 378385.
  • Bansal T, Jesudhasan P, Pillai S, Wood TK & Jayaraman A (2008) Temporal regulation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence mediated by autoinducer-2. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78: 811819.
  • Barker J & Brown MR (1994) Trojan horses of the microbial world: protozoa and the survival of bacterial pathogens in the environment. Microbiology 140(Pt 6): 12531259.
  • Barker J, Lambert PA & Brown MR (1993) Influence of intra-amoebic and other growth conditions on the surface properties of Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun 61: 35033510.
  • Barker J, Humphrey TJ & Brown MW (1999) Survival of Escherichia coli O157 in a soil protozoan: implications for disease. FEMS Microbiol Lett 173: 291295.
  • Bearson SM, Benjamin WH Jr, Swords WE & Foster JW (1996) Acid shock induction of RpoS is mediated by the mouse virulence gene mviA of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 178: 25722579.
  • Berger CN, Sodha SV, Shaw RK, Griffin PM, Pink D, Hand P & Frankel G (2010) Fresh fruit and vegetables as vehicles for the transmission of human pathogens. Environ Microbiol 12: 23852397.
  • Bergholz TM, Wick LM, Qi W, Riordan JT, Ouellette LM & Whittam TS (2007) Global transcriptional response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to growth transitions in glucose minimal medium. BMC Microbiol 7: 97.
  • Beutin L, Geier D, Steinruck H, Zimmermann S & Scheutz F (1993) Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin)-producing Escherichia coli in seven different species of healthy domestic animals. J Clin Microbiol 31: 24832488.
  • Bogosian G, Morris PJ & O'Neil JP (1998) A mixed culture recovery method indicates that enteric bacteria do not enter the viable but nonculturable state. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 17361742.
  • Bolton DJ, Monaghan A, Byrne B, Fanning S, Sweeney T & McDowell DA (2011) Incidence and survival of non-O157 verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli in soil. J Appl Microbiol 111: 484490.
  • Brooks JT, Sowers EG, Wells JG, Greene KD, Griffin PM, Hoekstra RM & Strockbine NA (2005) Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983–2002. J Infect Dis 192: 14221429.
  • Brown MR & Barker J (1999) Unexplored reservoirs of pathogenic bacteria: protozoa and biofilms. Trends Microbiol 7: 4650.
  • Bruce MG, Curtis MB, Payne MM, Gautom RK, Thompson EC, Bennett AL & Kobayashi JM (2003) Lake-associated outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Clark County, Washington, August 1999. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157: 10161021.
  • Bruneau A, Rodrigue H, Ismael J, Dion R & Allard R (2004) Outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 associated with bathing at a public beach in the Montreal-Centre region. Can Commun Dis Rep 30: 133136.
  • Burgess G (1998) Bacteria in oligotrophic environments: starvation survival lifestyle. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 14: 305.
  • Burow LC, Gobius KS, Vanselow BA & Klieve AV (2005) A lack of predatory interaction between rumen ciliate protozoa and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli. Lett Appl Microbiol 40: 117122.
  • Campbell GR, Prosser J, Glover A & Killham K (2001) Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil and water using multiplex PCR. J Appl Microbiol 91: 10041010.
  • Carruthers MD, Bellaire BH & Minion FC (2010) Exploring the response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL933 within Acanthamoeba castellanii by genome-wide transcriptional profiling. FEMS Microbiol Lett 312: 1523.
  • Chekabab SM, Daigle F, Charette SJ, Dozois CM & Harel J (2012) Survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in the presence of Acanthamoeba castellanii and its dependence on Pho regulon. MicrobiologyOpen 1: 427437.
  • Correll DL (1999) Phosphorus: a rate limiting nutrient in surface waters. Poult sci 78: 674682.
  • Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR & Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49: 711745.
  • Crepin S, Chekabab SM, Le Bihan G, Bertrand N, Dozois CM & Harel J (2011) The Pho regulon and the pathogenesis of Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol 153: 8288.
  • Croxen MA & Finlay BB (2010) Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol 8: 2638.
  • Czajkowska D, Witkowska-Gwiazdowska A, Sikorska I, Boszczyk-Maleszak H & Horoch M (2004) Survival of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 in water and in bottom-shore sediments. Pol J Environ Stud 14: 423430.
  • Dewanti R & Wong AC (1995) Influence of culture conditions on biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int J Food Microbiol 26: 147164.
  • Dharmasiri U, Witek MA, Adams AA, Osiri JK, Hupert ML, Bianchi TS, Roelke DL & Soper SA (2010) Enrichment and detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from water samples using an antibody modified microfluidic chip. Anal Chem 82: 28442849.
  • Diez-Gonzalez F & Russell JB (1997) The ability of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to decrease its intracellular pH and resist the toxicity of acetic acid. Microbiology 143(Pt 4): 11751180.
  • Doering P, Oviatt C, Nowicki B, Klos E & Reed L (1995) Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of primary production in a simulated estuarine gradient. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 124: 271287.
  • Dong T & Schellhorn HE (2009) Global effect of RpoS on gene expression in pathogenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL933. BMC Genomics 10: 349.
  • Doyle E & Kaspar C (2010) White Paper on Non-O157:H7 Shiga-Toxin Producing E. coli from Meat and Non-Meat Sources. The Food Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  • Duffitt AD, Reber RT, Whipple A & Chauret C (2011) Gene expression during survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil and water. Int J Microbiol 2011: 340506.
  • Duris JW, Haack SK & Fogarty LR (2009) Gene and antigen markers of shiga-toxin producing E. coli from Michigan and Indiana river water: occurrence and relation to recreational water quality criteria. J Environ Qual 38: 18781886.
  • EFSA (2011) European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control publishes Annual epidemiological report 2011. Euro Surveillance: ECDC. EFSA, Parma, Italy.
  • EFSA (2012) The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. Euro Surveillance: ECDC. EFSA.
  • Erickson MC & Doyle MP (2007) Food as a vehicle for transmission of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J Food Prot 70: 24262449.
  • Etienne-Mesmin L, Chassaing B, Sauvanet P, Denizot J, Blanquet-Diot S, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Pradel N & Livrelli V (2011) Interactions with M cells and macrophages as key steps in the pathogenesis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections. PLoS ONE 6: e23594.
  • Fairbrother JM & Nadeau E (2006) Escherichia coli: on-farm contamination of animals. Rev Sci Tech 25: 555569.
  • Fields BS (1996) The molecular ecology of legionellae. Trends Microbiol 4: 286290.
  • Gill A & Gill CO (2010) Non-O157 verotoxigenic Escherichia coli and beef: a Canadian perspective. Can J Vet Res 74: 161169.
  • Gould LH (2009) Update on the Epidemiology of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in the United States. Annual Capital Area Food Protection Association Meeting, Washington, DC.
  • Gould LH, Bopp C & Strockbine N et al. (2009) Recommendations for diagnosis of shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections by clinical laboratories. MMWR Recomm Rep 58 (RR12): 114.
  • Gourabathini P, Brandl MT, Redding KS et al. (2008) Interactions between food-borne pathogens and protozoa isolated from lettuce and spinach. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 25182525.
  • Griffin PM & Tauxe RV (1991) The epidemiology of infections caused by Escherichia coli O157:H7, other enterohemorrhagic E. coli, and the associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Epidemiol Rev 13: 6098.
  • Hancock D, Besser T, Lejeune J, Davis M & Rice D (2001) The control of VTEC in the animal reservoir. Int J Food Microbiol 66: 7178.
  • Hayashi T, Makino K, Ohnishi M et al. (2001) Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12. DNA Res 8: 1122.
  • Hengge-Aronis R (2002) Recent insights into the general stress response regulatory network in Escherichia coli. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 4: 341346.
  • Hrudey SE, Payment P, Huck PM, Gillham RW & Hrudey EJ (2003) A fatal waterborne disease epidemic in Walkerton, Ontario: comparison with other waterborne outbreaks in the developed world. Water Sci Technol 47: 714.
  • Hussein HS (2007) Prevalence and pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle and their products. J Anim Sci 85: E63E72.
  • Hussein HS & Bollinger LM (2005) Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle. J Food Prot 68: 22242241.
  • Hussein HS & Sakuma T (2005) Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: pre- and postharvest control measures to ensure safety of dairy cattle products. J Food Prot 68: 199207.
  • Huws SA, Morley RJ, Jones MV, Brown MR & Smith AW (2008) Interactions of some common pathogenic bacteria with Acanthamoeba polyphaga. FEMS Microbiol Lett 282: 258265.
  • Ibekwe AM & Ma J (2011) Effects of fumigants on microbial diversity and persistence of E. coli O15:H7 in contrasting soil microcosms. Sci Total Environ 409: 37403748.
  • Ihssen J & Egli T (2004) Specific growth rate and not cell density controls the general stress response in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 150: 16371648.
  • Itoh Y, Sugita-Konishi Y, Kasuga F, Iwaki M, Hara-Kudo Y, Saito N, Noguchi Y, Konuma H & Kumagai S (1998) Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 present in radish sprouts. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 15321535.
  • Jay MT, Garrett V, Mohle-Boetani JC et al. (2004) A multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection linked to consumption of beef tacos at a fast-food restaurant chain. Clin Infect Dis 39: 17.
  • Karmali MA (2004) Infection by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: an overview. Mol Biotechnol 26: 117122.
  • Karmali MA (2009) Host and pathogen determinants of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Kidney Int Suppl. Feb: S4-7.
  • Kassenborg HD, Hedberg CW, Hoekstra M et al. (2004) Farm visits and undercooked hamburgers as major risk factors for sporadic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection: data from a case–control study in 5 FoodNet sites. Clin Infect Dis 38(Suppl 3): S271S278.
  • King CH, Shotts EB Jr, Wooley RE & Porter KG (1988) Survival of coliforms and bacterial pathogens within protozoa during chlorination. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 30233033.
  • King LA, Nogareda F, Weill FX et al. (2012) Outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 associated with organic fenugreek sprouts, France, June 2011. Clin Infect Dis 54: 15881594.
  • Klein TM & Alexander M (1986) Bacterial inhibitors in lake water. Appl Environ Microbiol 52: 114118.
  • Kudoh Y, Kai A, Obata H, Kusunoki J, Monma C, Shingaki M, Yanagawa Y, Yamada S, Matsushita S & Itoh T (1994) Epidemiological surveys on verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in Japan. Recent Advances in Verocytotoxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infections (Excerpta Medica International Congress Series 1072) (Karmali MA, Goglio AG, eds). Amsterdam.
  • La Ragione RM, Best A, Woodward MJ & Wales AD (2009) Escherichia coli O157:H7 colonization in small domestic ruminants. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 394410.
  • Lainhart W, Stolfa G & Koudelka GB (2009) Shiga toxin as a bacterial defense against a eukaryotic predator, Tetrahymena thermophila. J Bacteriol 191: 51165122.
  • Lamarche MG, Wanner BL, Crepin S & Harel J (2008) The phosphate regulon and bacterial virulence: a regulatory network connecting phosphate homeostasis and pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32: 461473.
  • Lange R & Hengge-Aronis R (1991) Identification of a central regulator of stationary-phase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 5: 4959.
  • Leclerc H (2003) Relationships between common water bacteria & pathogens in drinking-water. Heterotrophic Plate Counts and Drinking-Water Safety: The Significance of HPCs for Water Quality and the Human Health (Bartram J ed.), pp. 8485. On behalf of WHO by IWA Publishing, London, UK.
  • Lee MB & Greig JD (2008) A review of enteric outbreaks in child care centers: effective infection control recommendations. J Environ Health 71: 2432, 46.
  • Lee J, Bansal T, Jayaraman A, Bentley WE & Wood TK (2007) Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli biofilms are inhibited by 7-hydroxyindole and stimulated by isatin. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 41004109.
  • Lee MS, Krumpelman SL, Apple JK, Yancey JWS, Kegley EB, PAS, Johnson MG, Brashears MM & Stephens TP (2009) In Vitro and In Vivo Investigations of Antimicrobial Treatments to Reduce Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Cattle Manure. The Professional Animal Scientist 25: 4959.
  • Lee JH, Kim YG, Cho MH, Wood TK & Lee J (2011) Transcriptomic analysis for genetic mechanisms of the factors related to biofilm formation in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Curr Microbiol 62: 13211330.
  • LeJeune JT, Besser TE & Hancock DD (2001) Cattle water troughs as reservoirs of Escherichia coli O157. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 30533057.
  • Licence K, Oates KR, Synge BA & Reid TM (2001) An outbreak of E. coli O157 infection with evidence of spread from animals to man through contamination of a private water supply. Epidemiol Infect 126: 135138.
  • Lin J, Lee IS, Frey J, Slonczewski JL & Foster JW (1995) Comparative analysis of extreme acid survival in Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 177: 40974104.
  • Liu Y, Gilchrist A, Zhang J & Li XF (2008) Detection of viable but nonculturable Escherichia coli O157:H7 bacteria in drinking water and river water. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 15021507.
  • Makino SI, Kii T, Asakura H, Shirahata T, Ikeda T, Takeshi K & Itoh K (2000) Does enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 enter the viable but nonculturable state in salted salmon roe? Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 55365539.
  • Martin JF (2004) Phosphate control of the biosynthesis of antibiotics and other secondary metabolites is mediated by the PhoR-PhoP system: an unfinished story. J Bacteriol 186: 51975201.
  • Masana MO, D'Astek BA, Palladino PM, Galli L, Del Castillo LL, Carbonari C, Leotta GA, Vilacoba E, Irino K & Rivas M (2011) Genotypic characterization of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef abattoirs of Argentina. J Food Prot 74: 20082017.
  • Matthews KR, Murdough PA & Bramley AJ (1997) Invasion of bovine epithelial cells by verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Appl Microbiol 82: 197203.
  • McDaniel TK, Jarvis KG, Donnenberg MS & Kaper JB (1995) A genetic locus of enterocyte effacement conserved among diverse enterobacterial pathogens. P Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 16641668.
  • McGee P, Bolton DJ, Sheridan JJ, Earley B, Kelly G & Leonard N (2002) Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in farm water: its role as a vector in the transmission of the organism within herds. J Appl Microbiol 93: 706713.
  • Mead PS & Griffin PM (1998) Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lancet 352: 12071212.
  • Miller JF, Mekalanos JJ & Falkow S (1989) Coordinate regulation and sensory transduction in the control of bacterial virulence. Science 243: 916922.
  • Morita RY (1997) Bacteria in Oligotrophic Environments: Starvation-Survival Lifestyle. Chapman & Hall, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • Muffler A, Traulsen DD, Lange R & Hengge-Aronis R (1996) Posttranscriptional osmotic regulation of the sigma(s) subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 178: 16071613.
  • Muffler A, Barth M, Marschall C & Hengge-Aronis R (1997) Heat shock regulation of sigmaS turnover: a role for DnaK and relationship between stress responses mediated by sigmaS and sigma32 in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 179: 445452.
  • Natvig EE, Ingham SC, Ingham BH, Cooperband LR & Roper TR (2002) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli contamination of root and leaf vegetables grown in soils with incorporated bovine manure. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 27372744.
  • Naylor SW, Gally DL & Low JC (2005) Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli in veterinary medicine. Int J Med Microbiol 295: 419441.
  • Oh DH, Pan Y, Berry E, Cooley M, Mandrell R & Breidt F Jr (2009) Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains isolated from environmental sources differ significantly in acetic acid resistance compared with human outbreak strains. J Food Prot 72: 503509.
  • Oliver JD (2005) The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol 43 Spec No: 93100.
  • Olsen SJ, Miller G, Breuer T, Kennedy M, Higgins C, Walford J, McKee G, Fox K, Bibb W & Mead P (2002) A waterborne outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections and hemolytic uremic syndrome: implications for rural water systems. Emerg Infect Dis 8: 370375.
  • Paytan A & McLaughlin K (2007) The oceanic phosphorus cycle. Chem Rev 107: 563576.
  • Perna NT, Plunkett G 3rd, Burland V et al. (2001) Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nature 409: 529533.
  • Peterson CN, Mandel MJ & Silhavy TJ (2005) Escherichia coli starvation diets: essential nutrients weigh in distinctly. J Bacteriol 187: 75497553.
  • Poirier K, Faucher SP, Beland M, Brousseau R, Gannon V, Martin C, Harel J & Daigle F (2008) Escherichia coli O157:H7 survives within human macrophages: global gene expression profile and involvement of the Shiga toxins. Infect Immun 76: 48144822.
  • Puttamreddy S, Cornick NA & Minion FC (2010) Genome-wide transposon mutagenesis reveals a role for pO157 genes in biofilm development in Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL933. Infect Immun 78: 23772384.
  • Ritchie JM, Campbell GR, Shepherd J, Beaton Y, Jones D, Killham K & Artz RR (2003) A stable bioluminescent construct of Escherichia coli O157:H7 for hazard assessments of long-term survival in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 33593367.
  • Rivas M, Miliwebsky E, Chinen I, Deza N & Leotta GA (2006) [The epidemiology of hemolytic uremic syndrome in Argentina. Diagnosis of the etiologic agent, reservoirs and routes of transmission]. Medicina 66 (Suppl 3): 2732.
  • Rivas L, Dykes GA & Fegan N (2007) A comparative study of biofilm formation by Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli using epifluorescence microscopy on stainless steel and a microtitre plate method. J Microbiol Methods 69: 4451.
  • Rodriguez-Zaragoza S (1994) Ecology of free-living amoebae. Crit Rev Microbiol 20: 225241.
  • Rozen Y & Belkin S (2001) Survival of enteric bacteria in seawater. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25: 513529.
  • Ryu JH & Beuchat LR (2005) Biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7 on stainless steel: effect of exopolysaccharide and Curli production on its resistance to chlorine. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 247254.
  • Ryu JH, Kim H & Beuchat LR (2004) Attachment and biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7 on stainless steel as influenced by exopolysaccharide production, nutrient availability, and temperature. J Food Prot 67: 21232131.
  • Sakuma M, Urashima M & Okabe N (2006) Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli, Japan, 1999–2004. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 323325.
  • Saldana Z, Xicohtencatl-Cortes J, Avelino F, Phillips AD, Kaper JB, Puente JL & Giron JA (2009) Synergistic role of curli and cellulose in cell adherence and biofilm formation of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli and identification of Fis as a negative regulator of curli. Environ Microbiol 11: 9921006.
  • Saldana Z, Sanchez E, Xicohtencatl-Cortes J, Puente JL & Giron JA (2011) Surface structures involved in plant stomata and leaf colonization by shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Front Microbiol 2: 119.
  • Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones JL & Griffin PM (2011) Foodborne illness acquired in the United States–major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 715.
  • Semenov AV, van Bruggen AH, van Overbeek L, Termorshuizen AJ & Semenov AM (2007) Influence of temperature fluctuations on Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in cow manure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60: 419428.
  • Semenov AV, van Overbeek L & van Bruggen AH (2009) Percolation and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in soil amended with contaminated dairy manure or slurry. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 32063215.
  • Siddiqui R & Khan NA (2012) Acanthamoeba is an evolutionary ancestor of macrophages: a myth or reality? Exp Parasitol 130: 9597.
  • Siegele DA & Kolter R (1992) Life after log. J Bacteriol 174: 345348.
  • Skandamis PN, Stopforth JD, Ashton LV, Geornaras I, Kendall PA & Sofos JN (2009) Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival, biofilm formation and acid tolerance under simulated slaughter plant moist and dry conditions. Food Microbiol 26: 112119.
  • Snedeker KG, Shaw DJ, Locking ME & Prescott RJ (2009) Primary and secondary cases in Escherichia coli O157 outbreaks: a statistical analysis. BMC Infect Dis 9: 144.
  • Solomon EB, Potenski CJ & Matthews KR (2002a) Effect of irrigation method on transmission to and persistence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on lettuce. J Food Prot 65: 673676.
  • Solomon EB, Yaron S & Matthews KR (2002b) Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from contaminated manure and irrigation water to lettuce plant tissue and its subsequent internalization. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 397400.
  • Steinberg KM & Levin BR (2007) Grazing protozoa and the evolution of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 Shiga toxin-encoding prophage. Proc Biol Sci 274: 19211929.
  • Steinert M, Birkness K, White E, Fields B & Quinn F (1998) Mycobacterium avium bacilli grow saprozoically in coculture with Acanthamoeba polyphaga and survive within cyst walls. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 22562261.
  • Stigi KA, Macdonald JK, Tellez-Marfin AA & Lofy KH (2012) Laboratory practices and incidence of non-O157 shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Emerg Infect Dis 18: 477479.
  • Sugumar G, Chrisolite B, Velayutham P, Selvan A & Ramesh U (2008) Occurrence and seasonal variation of bacterial indicators of faecal pollution along Thoothukudi Coast, Tamil Nadu. J Environ Biol 29: 387391.
  • Tao H, Bausch C, Richmond C, Blattner FR & Conway T (1999) Functional genomics: expression analysis of Escherichia coli growing on minimal and rich media. J Bacteriol 181: 64256440.
  • Thompson LH, Giercke S, Beaudoin C, Woodward D & Wylie JL (2005) Enhanced surveillance of non-O157 verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli in human stool samples from Manitoba. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 16: 329334.
  • Torres AG, Giron JA, Perna NT, Burland V, Blattner FR, Avelino-Flores F & Kaper JB (2002) Identification and characterization of lpfABCC'DE, a fimbrial operon of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect Immun 70: 54165427.
  • Torres AG, Jeter C, Langley W & Matthysse AG (2005) Differential binding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to alfalfa, human epithelial cells, and plastic is mediated by a variety of surface structures. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 80088015.
  • Uhlich GA, Cooke PH & Solomon EB (2006) Analyses of the red-dry-rough phenotype of an Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain and its role in biofilm formation and resistance to antibacterial agents. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 25642572.
  • Uhlich GA, Rogers DP & Mosier DA (2010) Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 retention on solid surfaces and peroxide resistance is enhanced by dual-strain biofilm formation. Foodborne Pathog Dis 7: 935943.
  • Vally H, Hall G, Dyda A, Raupach J, Knope K, Combs B & Desmarchelier P (2012) Epidemiology of Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli in Australia, 2000–2010. BMC Public Health 12: 63.
  • VanBogelen RA, Olson ER, Wanner BL & Neidhardt FC (1996) Global analysis of proteins synthesized during phosphorus restriction in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 178: 43444366.
  • Varma JK, Greene KD & Reller ME et al. (2003) An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 infection following exposure to a contaminated building. JAMA 290: 27092712.
  • Vital M, Hammes F & Egli T (2008) Escherichia coli O157 can grow in natural freshwater at low carbon concentrations. Environ Microbiol 10: 23872396.
  • Wade TJ, Calderon RL, Sams E, Beach M, Brenner KP, Williams AH & Dufour AP (2006) Rapidly measured indicators of recreational water quality are predictive of swimming-associated gastrointestinal illness. Environ Health Perspect 114: 2428.
  • Wang G & Doyle MP (1998) Survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in water. J Food Prot 61: 662667.
  • Wang A, Lin B, Sleep BE & Liss SN (2011) The impact of biofilm growth on transport of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in sand. Ground Water 49: 2031.
  • Warburton DW, Austin JW, Harrison BH & Sanders G (1998) Survival and recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in inoculated bottled water. J Food Prot 61: 948952.
  • Watterworth L, Rosa B, Schraft H, Topp E & Leung K (2006) Survival of various ERIC-genotypes of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in well water. Water Air Soil Pollut 177: 367382.
  • Werner M, Maschek HJ, Kaloutsi V, Buhr T, Kausche F, Delventhal S & Georgii A (1990) Cytogenetic examination of bone marrow cells in stem cell diseases of myelodysplastic syndromes. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 74: 139143.
  • Wieler LH, Vieler E, Erpenstein C, Schlapp T, Steinruck H, Bauerfeind R, Byomi A & Baljer G (1996) Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from bovines: association of adhesion with carriage of eae and other genes. J Clin Microbiol 34: 29802984.
  • Williams LD, Hamilton PS, Wilson BW & Estock MD (1997) An outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157:H7: involving long term shedding and person-to-person transmission in a child care center. J Environ Health 59: 9.
  • Xicohtencatl-Cortes J, Sanchez Chacon E, Saldana Z, Freer E & Giron JA (2009) Interaction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 with leafy green produce. J Food Prot 72: 15311537.
  • Yan L, Cerny RL & Cirillo JD (2004) Evidence that hsp90 is involved in the altered interactions of Acanthamoeba castellanii variants with bacteria. Eukaryot Cell 3: 567578.
  • Yoon Y & Sofos JN (2008) Autoinducer-2 activity of gram-negative foodborne pathogenic bacteria and its influence on biofilm formation. J Food Sci 73: M140M147.
  • Yoshida Y, Sugiyama S, Oyamada T, Yokoyama K & Makino K (2012) Novel members of the phosphate regulon in Escherichia coli O157:H7 identified using a whole-genome shotgun approach. Gene 502: 2735.