SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. You have free access to this content1
    Rachel B. Blass, Zvi Carmeli, Further evidence for the case against neuropsychoanalysis: How Yovell, Solms, and Fotopoulou's response to our critique confirms the irrelevance and harmfulness to psychoanalysis of the contemporary neuroscientific trend, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2015, 96, 6
  2. 2
    Yoram Yovell, Mark Solms, Aikaterini Fotopoulou, The case for neuropsychoanalysis: Why a dialogue with neuroscience is necessary but not sufficient for psychoanalysis, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2015, 96, 6
  3. 3
    Ricardo Bernardi, What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis?, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2015, 96, 3
  4. 4
    Robin Brooks, Accounting for Material Reality in the Analytic Subject, Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 3, 4, 619

    CrossRef