These authors contributed equally to this work.
Comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus casei strains isolated from Actimel and Yakult products reveals marked similarities and points to a common origin
Article first published online: 1 JUL 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Volume 6, Issue 5, pages 576–587, September 2013
How to Cite
Douillard, F. P., Kant, R., Ritari, J., Paulin, L., Palva, A. and de Vos, W. M. (2013), Comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus casei strains isolated from Actimel and Yakult products reveals marked similarities and points to a common origin. Microbial Biotechnology, 6: 576–587. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12062
Funding Information The present work was supported by the Center of Excellence in Microbial Food Safety Research (Academy of Finland, Grant 141140), Grant ERC 250172 – Microbes Inside from the European Research Council and Grants 137389 and 141130 from the Academy of Finland. F.P.D. was funded by a postdoctoral research fellowship (Academy of Finland, Grant 252123).
- Issue published online: 14 AUG 2013
- Article first published online: 1 JUL 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 15 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 7 FEB 2013
- Center of Excellence in Microbial Food Safety Research (Academy of Finland. Grant Number: 141140
- European Research Council. Grant Number: ERC 250172
- Academy of Finland. Grant Numbers: 137389, 141130, 252123
Vol. 7, Issue 1, 85, Article first published online: 10 DEC 2013
Total views by type:
Publication date: 1 Jul 2013. Cumulative views from 1 Jul 2013 - 1 Apr 2015.
- Total views: 2347
- Total PDF views: 919
- Total HTML views: 1428
- * Although we update our data on a daily basis (not in real time), there may be a 48-hour delay before the most recent numbers are available.
About this data
Usage data should be viewed in relation to:
- the publication date (older articles will generally have higher usage).
- the relevance of the article to a broad community (some articles will be extremely important but to smaller sections of the research community), and
- the availability and usage of the article through other sources
Article usage data is not a precise measure of an individual article's importance and should only be considered alongside other measures of visibility/importance.