1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information

Membrane-aerated biofilm reactors performing autotrophic nitrogen removal can be successfully applied to treat concentrated nitrogen streams. However, their process performance is seriously hampered by the growth of nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB). In this work we document how sequential aeration can bring the rapid and long-term suppression of NOB and the onset of the activity of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AnAOB). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses confirmed that such shift in performance was mirrored by a change in population densities, with a very drastic reduction of the NOB Nitrospira and Nitrobacter and a 10-fold increase in AnAOB numbers. The study of biofilm sections with relevant 16S rRNA fluorescent probes revealed strongly stratified biofilm structures fostering aerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in biofilm areas close to the membrane surface (rich in oxygen) and AnAOB in regions neighbouring the liquid phase. Both communities were separated by a transition region potentially populated by denitrifying heterotrophic bacteria. AOB and AnAOB bacterial groups were more abundant and diverse than NOB, and dominated by the r-strategists Nitrosomonas europaea and Ca. Brocadia anammoxidans, respectively. Taken together, the present work presents tools to better engineer, monitor and control the microbial communities that support robust, sustainable and efficient nitrogen removal.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information

The discovery of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AnAOB, aka anammox bacteria) two decades ago has launched a new phase in wastewater biotechnology. Many reactor concepts have been developed to take advantage of this functional group for the treatment of nitrogen (N)-rich waste streams. AnAOB can grow symbiotically with aerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in biofilms with redox gradients, allowing the conversion of equimolar mixtures of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrite (NO2) to nitrogen gas (N2) without the addition of organic carbon (Terada et al., 2011). In membrane-aerated biofilm reactors (MABRs) such redox gradient conditions can establish in a counter-diffusion mode, with oxygen (O2) entering the biofilm through the membrane–biofilm interface and NH4+ diffusing from the liquid phase into the biofilm at its surface. We have recently shown that this biofilm reactor configuration can effectively support autotrophic N removal from synthetic waste streams at a lower energy, spatial, and environmental footprint than is feasible by conventional (i.e. based on co-diffusion) biofilm technologies (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010; Gilmore et al., 2013).

NO2 is a central intermediate in autotrophic N conversions: it is the product of AOB and is a necessary substrate for AnAOB. Therefore, metabolically active nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) are undesirable during autotrophic N removal, as the oxidation of NO2 to nitrate (NO3), catalysed by NOB, would hamper AnAOB activity. Several strategies have been explored to suppress or control NOB growth in suspended growth or co-diffusion biofilm systems such as operation at elevated pH, low dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, or higher temperatures (Van Hulle et al., 2010). However, none of these procedures has proven efficient to suppress NOB activity in MABRs (Wang et al., 2009; Terada et al., 2010). In large part, this difficulty in outcompeting NOB may be due to the localization of NOB, this microbial guild, in MABR biofilms. NOB, when present, grow in the aerobic regions of the biofilm (inner biofilm regions due to O2 diffusion across the biofilm base) where DO and NO2 concentrations are highest, and any changes applied to the liquid phase will have minimal effects. New approaches such as careful inoculum selection or implementation of cyclic aeration patterns have been explored and proven successful to moderate NOB activity in MABRs (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010; Terada et al., 2010).

While the above studies have demonstrated the feasibility and identified suitable operational conditions for MABRs targeting autotrophic N removal (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010; Gilmore et al., 2013), direct inspection of the microbial community structure and composition in the resulting MABR biofilms has been limited. Such inspection is not only necessary to assess the robustness of the process through the study of the diversity of the established microbial community, but also to deepen the understanding about how biofilms can be engineered for a certain operational purpose by applying selected operational strategies. In addition, information from direct biofilm inspection can be used to support or modify biofilm process models, where community compositions are easily predicted but rarely verified (Terada et al., 2007; Lackner et al., 2008).

Here, we present the first exhaustive characterization study of the structure and composition of microbial biofilms that support autotrophic N removal in MABRs (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010). We are especially keen to verify whether the imposed redox stratification results in the predicted ecological stratification of the involved functional groups, whether suppression of NOB and stimulation of AnAOB activity by sequential aeration is mirrored by the abundances of NOB and AnAOB, whether operational and reactor conditions have resulted in a more or less diverse set of functional guilds, and whether heterotrophic bacteria (HB) coexist in this autotroph-dominated community. Hence, we used a complementary set of molecular and microscopic tools to identify, quantify and assess the microbial diversity and structure of biofilms in a long-term operated MABR run under O2 limitation and treating a synthetic NH4+ rich influent.

Results and discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information

Microbial dynamics during reactor operation

From inoculation to month 13, the reactor was operated in continuous aeration mode. The O2 to NH4+ loading ratio was controlled at the optimal value for complete NH4+ conversion to N2 via the nitritation-anammox pathway (Terada et al., 2007). Notwithstanding the imposed O2 limited operation, most of the NH4+ was simply converted to NO3, resulting in limited N removal (Fig. 1A). From month 13 onward, O2 was supplied in cycles of aeration/non-aeration, dramatically affecting reactor performance. Initially, strong NO2 accumulation was observed, followed by an increase in AnAOB activity and nearly maximal N removal (70%). In addition, at this point, minimal nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were observed (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010).


Figure 1. Reactor performance and microbial community abundances during reactor operation. Month 0: reactor start-up after AnAOB inoculation. 23 months: reactor shutdown.

A. Averaged reactor performance during biomass sampling periods. Concentrations of NH4+, NO2, NO3 and the N denitrified/assimilated -ΔN- are stacked, yielding the NH4+ concentration in the influent.

B. Population dynamics measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Imposition of the sequential aeration regime caused clear shifts in the microbial community, as suggested by the results obtained from real-time quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR) using relevant primers (Fig. 1B): the abundance of Nitrobacter spp. decreased by an order of magnitude. Nitrobacter spp. are considered r-strategist NOB (Schramm, 2003), whose presence is correlated with poor nitritation efficiencies (Terada et al., 2010). Both 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 1B) and nxrA (Fig. 1; in the Supporting Information, Fig. S1) targeted NOB quantifications were consistent. The gene copy numbers of Nitrobacter spp. increased by the end of the experiment (still under sequential aeration), but they did not negatively affect reactor performance (Fig. 1A). The abundance of the Nitrospira spp. was also severely affected by the onset of the sequential aeration: it decreased and dropped to the quantification limit until the end of the experiment. These data suggest that the Nitrospira NOB, despite their lower abundance vis-à-vis Nitrobacter NOB, were responsible for the conversion of NO2 to NO3 during the antecedent continuous aeration phase. This NOB genus is known to thrive in environments with low NO2 concentrations (K-strategist, Schramm, 2003). The overall reduction in NOB abundance was mirrored by a significant increase in AnAOB numbers, as reflected by 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 1B) and hzo-targeted quantifications (Fig. S1). The exact reasons explaining the observed suppression of the NOB upon onset of the sequential aeration regime are unknown, but we hypothesize that AOB are less affected by the feast/famine conditions associated with cyclic aeration (Geets et al., 2006) and display a higher affinity for O2 at low concentrations than NOB (Blackburne et al., 2008), which would allow AOB to outcompete NOB for the transiently available limiting O2. AOB are known to release hydroxylamine and NO during O2 transients, compounds which may have also inhibited NOB (Schmidt et al., 2003; Noophan et al., 2004; Kostera et al., 2008). The increased NO2 availability (due to NOB suppression), and the postulated transiently available NO may also have enhanced NO2 uptake by AnAOB upon the onset of cyclic aeration (Jetten et al., 2009; Kartal et al., 2010). Although NO2 concentrations (in the bulk phase) attained values as high as 200 mg-N l−1, they did not prevent the stimulation of AnAOB activity, in contrast with earlier studies that reported NO2 values as low as 28 mg-N l−1 to negatively affect their activity (van der Graaf et al., 1996).

The density of denitrifying bacteria was approximated by quantifying the abundance of the nirK and nirS genes; nirK and nirS encode NO2 reductase enzymes in both heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria (nirS and nirK) or nitrifiers (nirK, Braker et al., 1998; Casciotti and Ward, 2001; Heylen et al., 2006). Onset of cyclic aeration caused a significant decrease in nirK abundance, while nirS remained relatively constant. Because AOB abundance remained fairly constant, this trend suggests a shift in the heterotrophic denitrifying guild, becoming more nirS abundant as AnAOB density and activity increased. The decrease in NOB, also known to contain nirK in their genome (Schreiber et al., 2012), could have contributed as well to the observed drop. Prior work revealed that N2O emissions from our and other MABRs were very low when AnAOB activity was high (∼0.015% and < 0.001% N-N2O/ N-load during the aerated and non-aerated phase of an aeration cycle, respectively, Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010), but can be very high when AnAOB activity is low (2–11% N-N2O/ N-load; Gilmore et al., 2013). Because N2O emissions are, in part, caused by NO2 reductase (Zumft, 1997), it will be interesting to verify whether the dramatic drop in nirK abundance directly correlates with reduction in N2O emissions.

Microbial community composition and architecture

After 23 months of operation (630 days), the developed biofilm exhibited a very pronounced radial stratification of the microbial community (Fig. 2A). The biofilm region adjacent to the hollow fibre membrane was clearly dominated by AOB, as indicated by the simultaneous signal from EUB – all bacteria – and AOB targeting probes (Table 1, combination 1). The thickness of the observed AOB layer ranged from 110 to 170 μm across all analysed samples, comparable to the O2 penetration measured with microsensors during reactor operation here and in other nitritating MABRs (Fig. S2, Terada et al., 2010). Moreover, since the DO concentration in the bulk liquid was close to the detection limit of the DO probe used (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010), it could be concluded that the AOB group consumed most of the O2 transferred from the membrane, and mediated the partial conversion of the NH4+ diffusing from the bulk liquid to NO2. High magnification micrographs in this area revealed rod-shaped cells in very compact strata around the hollow fibre membranes (Fig. 2D). The average biofilm porosities calculated here were 0.36 ± 0.07, half of what is considered normal in co-diffusion biofilm systems (Zhang and Bishop, 1994). This packed and ordered structure of AOB is very different from the cauliflower-shaped clusters observed in other biofilm systems (Okabe and Kamagata, 2010), which may be caused from the pressure of upper biofilm strata onto the biofilm base, high growth velocities or the high competition for O2 and space in this region. Isolated cauliflower-shaped clusters could only be seen in biofilm regions distant from the membrane where DO concentrations were lower.


Figure 2. Biofilm cross-sections hybridized with fluorescent probes targeting AOB and AnAOB. HF and BL stand for hollow fiber and bulk liquid respectively.

A. Biofilm cross-section hybridized with probes targeting All Bacteria (EUBmix), AOB and AnAOB.

B. Biofilm section hybridized with probes targeting All Bacteria (EUBmix), halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp and N. oligotropha.

C. Biofilm section hybridized with probes targeting All Bacteria (EUBmix), halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp. and Nitrosospira spp.

D. Detail of Fig. 2A at the membrane–biofilm interface (d).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Table 1. Probe combinations used in the study (after Loy et al., 2007; Okabe and Kamagata, 2010). Probe sequences and hybridization conditions for each probe are available in Table S1
No.Experimental PurposeFluorophore
FLUO (green)Cy3 (red)Cy5 (blue)
  1. a

    Probe requires a competitor

1.Verify spatial distribution of AOB and AnAOBEUBmixNso190-Nmo218-Cluster 6a192aAmx820
2.Examine abundance of Nitrosospira spp. vs halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp. (AOB)EUBmixNsv443NEUa
3.Examine abundance of N. oligotropha vs halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp. (AOB)EUBmixNEUaNmo218-Cluster 6a192a
4.Examine abundance of Candidatus Kuenenia spp. vs Candidatus Brocadia spp. (AnAOB)EUBmixKst157Ban162
5.Examine abundance of Nitrobacter spp. vs Nitrospira spp. (NOB)EUBmixNIT3aNtspa662a

The use of probes with higher phylogenetic resolution (Table 1, combinations 2 and 3, Fig. 2B and C), indicated that halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp. were the dominant AOB in the system. Halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp. are known to outcompete other AOB species in environments with high substrate availability (Okabe and Kamagata, 2010). The high NH4+ concentrations expected across the whole biofilm thickness (bulk concentrations ranged from 100 to 400 mg-N l−1) may hamper the ability of Nitrosospira spp. to thrive even in biofilm areas with lower DO concentrations, as previously reported (Schramm et al., 2000). Our observation is in agreement with the work by Terada et al. (2010), who noted that MABR biofilms populated by Nitrosomonas spp. rather than Nitrosospira spp. supported higher NO2 production. Halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp. are typically the most abundant AOB in co-diffusion biofilms performing autotrophic N removal (Sliekers et al., 2003; Vázquez-Padín et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012).

Microcolonies of the N. oligotropha lineage (Table 1, probe combination 3, Fig. 1B) were occasionally observed and randomly distributed within aerobic biofilm regions. Although N. oligotropha is expected in environments of low substrate availability, N. oligotropha and N. europaea can coexist in aerobic regions of nitrifying biofilms when operated under dynamic aeration conditions (Gieseke et al., 2001). In another MABR biofilm performing autotrophic N removal under continuous aeration N. oligotropha and halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp. were also identified as the most abundant AOB (Gilmore et al., 2013). In that study however, N. oligotropha signals were observed in anaerobic strata parallel to the membrane surface, suggesting cell maintenance without growth, as N. oligotropha is, among other AOB, able to maintain its ribosome content even under famine conditions (Gieseke et al., 2001).

AnAOB-positive signals were exclusively found close to the biofilm top, at least 300 μm away from the membrane surface (Fig. 2A). Microsensor measurements confirmed that DO was almost absent in this region (Fig. S2), while high NH4+ and NO2 concentrations were expected, given their concentrations in the bulk liquid (Fig. 1A). AnAOB microcolonies were spearhead- or oval-shaped with round edges. High magnification micrographs (Fig. 3B) revealed doughnut-shaped cellular morphology, characteristic of AnAOB (rRNA distributes around the central anammoxome organelle, Kuenen, 2008).


Figure 3. Biofilm cross-sections hybridized with fluorescent probes targeting AnAOB. HF and BL stand for hollow fiber and bulk liquid respectively.

A. Biofilm cross-section hybridized with probes targeting All Bacteria (EUBmix), Ca. Brocadia, and Ca. Kuenenia.

B. Detail of Fig. 3-A in regions neighbouring the bulk liquid (b).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Although it is rare to find multiple AnAOB species in bioreactors performing autotrophic N removal (Hu et al., 2010; Park et al., 2010a), both Ca. Brocadia anammoxidans (dark cyan) and Ca. Kuenenia stuttgartiensis (light orange) were observed here. However, Brocadia signals were clearly more abundant (Fig. 3A, Table 1, combination 4). These two AnAOB have different postulated growth preferences: Ca. Brocadia seems to thrive in environments with high substrate availability (r-strategist), while Ca. Kuenenia finds its niche in environments with nutrient scarcity (K-strategist) (van der Star et al., 2008). Microcolonies of both AnAOB lineages do not appear to be stratified within our biofilms. This observation might be due to the changing NH4+ and NO2 concentrations during sequential aeration. In a continuously aerated MABR performing autotrophic N removal exclusively the Ca. Brocadia AnAOB lineage was observed (Gilmore et al., 2013).

Overall reactor mass balance calculations suggested that, although substantial N removal was observed (5.5 g-N m−2 day−1), approximately 30% of the NO3 production was due to residual NOB activity (0.3 g-N m−2 day−1), while the remainder had been synthesized by AnAOB (0.7 g-N m−2 day−1, Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010). Here, NOB could still be detected in the biofilm (Table 1, combination 5, Fig. 4), even though they were clearly outnumbered by AOB in the aerobic biofilm regions. NOB in these biofilms were exposed to dual competitive pressure caused by fast growing AOB (consuming most O2) and AnAOBs (consuming the generated NO2; Terada et al., 2010; Gilmore et al., 2013). Only Nitrospira, a K-strategist NOB, was observed in the biofilm after fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) inspection (Fig. 4A), while Nitrobacter, detectable via qPCR analyses, was not observed, suggesting their lower activity. In well-functioning co-diffusion autotrophic N removal biofilms, both NOB types have been found (Sliekers et al., 2002; Park et al., 2010a).


Figure 4. Biofilm cross-sections hybridized with fluorescent probes targeting NOB. HF and BL stand for hollow fiber and bulk liquid respectively.

A. Biofilm section hybridized with probes targeting All Bacteria (EUBmix), Nitrobacter and Nitrospira.

B. Detail of Fig. 4A in a region close to the aeration membrane (b).

Download figure to PowerPoint

While Nitrospira signals appeared most abundant distant from the biofilm base, scattered Nitrospira-positive cells were also detected in the aerobic regions close to the biofilm–membrane interface (Fig. 4B). This observation is in contrast with a previous MABR study, which suggested that DO concentrations at the membrane–biofilm interface above 63 μM result in a shift in the NOB community from Nitrospira to Nitrobacter, leading to a reduction in nitritation efficiencies (Downing and Nerenberg, 2008). In our system, DO concentrations at the membrane–biofilm interface were as high as 300 μM (Fig. S2), and yet no Nitrobacter signals were observed. High nitritation turnover is therefore possible in MABRs under intensive O2 loading conditions if a cyclic aeration pattern is imposed.

Between the aerobic (AOB-signal rich) and anaerobic (AnAOB-signal rich) biofilm regions, a transitional zone existed where no conclusive phylogenetic assignments could be made based on the employed FISH probes. A non-sense probe (non-EUB) was successfully applied at the first stages of the study to rule out any autofluorescence or unspecific probe binding in this region. Additional analyses of metabolic activity were made by normalizing the cellular ribosomal content (using EUBmix signal as proxy) to the total cellular genomic content (using SYTO 60 signal as proxy) across the biofilm. This analysis yielded three tentative peaks (Fig. 5A); the peaks at the biofilm base (0) and top (1) were indicative of the described AOB and AnAOB regions. A third additional peak in the centre of the biofilm (normalized biofilm thickness of 0.4) might indicate the presence of metabolically active cells in this transition region (Fig. 5A), even though the increase in signal intensity observed was not statistically significant, as could be concluded from the ANOVA test performed. Application of double-labelled oligonucleotide probes (DOPE probes, Stoecker et al., 2010) did not improve the assignments (results not shown). Earlier modelling efforts in MABRs for autotrophic N removal predicted the accumulation of HB and large amounts of bacterial debris in this transition zone (Fig. 5B, Lackner et al., 2008). Together with the qPCR results (showing abundant nirS numbers, indicative of heterotrophic denitrifiers), this suggests an anoxic transition zone populated by a heterotrophic denitrifying community. In addition, the non-specific and low probe signals observed suggest that these regions contained biomass debris and non-viable cells, consistent with the described model predictions.


Figure 5. Observed and predicted occurrence of metabolically active biofilm regions. Normalized biofilm thickness = 1 (biofilm top). Normalized biofilm thickness = 0 (membrane–biofilm interface).

A. Averaged relative activity profile with biofilm depth (n = 4). Standard deviations represented with error bars in each column.

B. Relative space occupancy profile for the considered bacterial communities calculated by mathematical modelling in a previous study describing heterotrophic activity in MABR biofilms for autotrophic N removal (Lackner et al., 2008).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Microbial community abundances

Quantitative image analysis of the presented FISH results revealed that AOB and AnAOB accounted for 53 ± 13% and 38 ± 6% of the biofilm, with 9 ± 8% of the EUB signals not accounted for by either AOB or AnAOB (Table 1, combination 1). A separate analysis indicated a highly variable NOB fraction constituting 11 ± 10% of all detected EUB signals (Table 1, combination 5). These AOB, NOB and AnAOB fractions are consistent with those observed by FISH analysis in co-diffusion biofilms performing autotrophic N removal (Liu et al., 2012).

These qFISH results compare with those obtained by qPCR, for which AOB, NOB and AnAOB fractions were estimated at about 5, 0.2 and 25% of the total community population (considering that each cell contained a single copy of the genes targeted by qPCR primers, Table 2). Differences in sampling procedure may have impacted considerably the AOB and NOB results obtained by qPCR. While the entire biofilm is probed and imaged during FISH analysis (both biofilm and membrane were cryosectioned), only the biomass that could be scraped off the membranes was quantified by qPCR. As nitrifiers were preferentially present adjacent to the aeration membrane, AOB and NOB underestimation by qPCR was likely. Additionally, DNA extraction methods are known to display different yields in different types of bacterial species, which may bias substantially later qPCR analyses (Juretschko et al., 2002; Foesel et al., 2008). The targeted functional genes may be present in multiple copies per cell in the different biocatalysts studied, which could also lead to wrong estimates of the community fractions by qPCR calculated here (Pei et al., 2010). Finally, small differences could also be explained by the fact that, oligonucleotide probes (for FISH) and primers (for qPCR) do not necessary detect exactly the same phylogenetic clades (Hallin et al., 2005).

Table 2. Relative abundance of functional microbial guilds after 630 days of operation assessed via different molecular techniques
  1. a

    Taxonomy index of each functional guild was given in supplementary document (Table S1).

AOB2.70 ± 0.87%5.4 ± 0.2%53.7 ± 13.2%
NOB0.57 ± 0.12%0.2 ± 0.2%11.4 ± 10%
AnOB60.00 ± 3.42%25.0 ± 12.1%38.2 ± 5.8

The presented results, however, seem to converge in the fact that AOB and AnAOB are the most abundant microbial guilds. Model calibration and process operation can greatly benefit from the dual detection approach presented here. While FISH and microelectrode results would give information on the position and relative abundances of the functional microbial communities (Schramm et al., 2000), qPCR performed on representative biomass samples would allow for routine observation measurements on the microbial dynamics of the system. These observations could alert about unwanted changes in the microbial community supporting the process and suggest the need of imposing process control to correct deviations from the desired set point (Park et al., 2010a).

Diversity of community fractions assessed by deep sequencing

Microbial diversity of relevant functional guilds (AOB, NOB and AnAOB) was revealed by pyrosequencing the V3-V4 region of amplified community 16S rDNA. After implementation of quality control measures and denoising, 19 962 sequences were obtained from triplicate samples, which could be binned in 439 operational taxonomic units based on 97% phylogenetic similarity (OTU0.03). A total of 15, 2 and 6 OTUs0.03 could be assigned to AnAOB, NOB and AOB respectively (Fig. 6). All three sequence libraries shared 117 OTUs0.03 but were distinct due to abundant unshared genotypes (Fig. S3).


Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of identified AOB, NOB and AnAOB sequences, and reference strains. Sequences from 16S rRNA libraries were assembled in OTUs based on 97% similarity. Distance matrices were computed with Jukes-Cantor method, and phylogenetic trees were rendered based on neighbour joining with bootstrap replication. Numbers at the branch nodes indicate bootstrap values over 40%. Number of identified sequences in each OTU is listed. OTUs with singular sequences are not shown. Full tree is available in Figure S4.

Download figure to PowerPoint

A remarkable diversity was detected within the AnAOB guild containing 15 OTUs0.03, while sampling depth may not yet have revealed the complete diversity. Sequences of both the Kuenenia and Brocadia lineages were detected. While species richness in both lineages was the same (8 each), Brocadia sequences were significantly more abundant (290:1), consistent with FISH observations. Sequences affiliated to the aerobic ammonium oxidizer Nitrosomonas europaea (509 seq.) and the NO2 oxidizer Nitrobacter hamburgensis (100 seq.) were the dominant nitrifying bacteria in the studied MABR biofilms (Fig. 6). While the diversity of AOB was relatively high, species different to N. europaea represented only minor fractions of the AOB guild (most having a single sequence for each OTU0.03, occurring in only one of the replicates, Fig. S4). Higher microbial diversity is normally reported in systems with dynamic operation conditions (Rowan et al., 2003).

Heterotrophic OTUs0.03 (41) were found in all samples despite the absence of organic carbon in the synthetic feed. The most abundant HB sequences were mainly assigned to the Xanthomonadaceae (γ-Proteobacteria, 550 seq.) and Clostridiaceae (Firmicutes, 356 seq.) families. Our results are in agreement with the findings of a study applying microautoradiography combined with FISH (MAR-FISH) to unravel the patterns in the cross-feeding of microbial products originating from nitrifier decay to HB (Okabe et al., 2005). In that study Chloroflexi and Cytophaga-Flavobacterium cluster cells were responsible for the degradation of slow biodegradable material (e.g. cells). Furthermore, members of the α- and γ-Proteobacteria (e.g. Xanthomonadaceae, typical in low carbon environments) metabolized other low-molecular weight organic substrates. Members of the Clostridiaceae family were not detected by their approach (gram positive bacterial require special fixation protocols), but, like Xanthomonadaceae, they are also known to degrade complex organic substrates and use NO3 and NO2 as electron acceptor in anaerobic environments (Finkmann et al., 2000; Wüst et al., 2011). CARD FISH may further assist in the identification of the organisms present in this intermediate region.

The fractions of AOB, NOB and AnAOB were identified based on the number of sequences detected by pyrosequencing. The results were further compared to those obtained by qPCR and FISH (Table 2). The abundance results obtained by pyrosequencing confirm the reduced NOB abundance with respect to AOB and AnAOB. The quantification of AOB and Nitrospira spp. was also affected with respect to qFISH. As previously indicated, such a divergence in results can arise by the difficulty in detaching the aerobic biofilm regions from the membrane or by a lower DNA extraction efficiency of the proposed treatment for these microbial species. The differences observed among PCR-based techniques could be related to the different amplification efficiency of universal primers (used in pyrosequencing) compared with family- and genus-specific primers (used in qPCR). Indeed, universal primers enhance the detection of highly abundant taxa but disfavour species represented by lower fractions (Gonzalez et al., 2012).


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information

Imposition of sequential aeration was successful in the rapid suppression of NOB activity and stimulating and maintaining AnAOB activity in the MABR, at very high effective O2 loadings (4-14g-O2 m−2 day−1). qPCR-based analysis revealed the following most remarkable shifts in the biofilm composition: a strong and moderate decrease in, respectively, the nirK, Nitrospira and Nitrobacter 16S rRNA gene abundance, and a strong increase in the AnAOB 16S rRNA gene abundance.

FISH analysis of the biofilms, after long-term sequential aeration, confirmed radial microbial stratification, with AOB at very high cellular densities in the O2-rich areas close to the membrane surface, and AnAOB located close to the bulk liquid, separated by a transition region potentially harbouring denitrifying HB supported by decay products. Extant diversity assessed by using phylogenetically defined FISH probes revealed that halophilic and halotolerant Nitrosomonas spp., Ca. Brocadia anammoxidans and Nitrospira spp. were the most abundant lineages within the AOB, NOB and AnAOB guilds respectively. AOB and AnAOB constituted the most abundant community fractions, outnumbering NOB. Deep sequencing of the mature biofilm showed that the AOB guild was dominated by a single N. europaea OTU and confirmed a diverse AnAOB guild containing one most abundant Brocadia spp. OTU. Overall, our multipronged analysis confirmed that sequential aeration regimes can be used to successfully to engineer a microbial community to attain high-rate autotrophic N removal.

Experimental procedures

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information


Samples were obtained from a MABR performing stable N removal at 5.5 g-N m−2 day−1 via the nitritation-anammox pathway. This reactor housed 10 membrane bundles, each containing 128 30 cm long hollow-fibres (Model MHF3504, polyethylene/polyurethane, Mitsubishi Rayon, Tokyo, Japan). The reactor was inoculated in two steps with biomass from nitrifying (day −30) and AnAOB enrichment cultures (day 0), and was fed a synthetic NH4+-rich influent (100–500 mg-N l−1), while air was passed through the fibre lumens (2.5-40 kPa and 2.5–60 l min−1). After 390 days of operation the reactor was aerated in sequential cycles comprising aerated and non-aerated periods (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010). On days 90, 150, 390 and 480, biofilm samples were detached and removed from the reactor by inserting a Pasteur pipette through the installed sampling ports and aspiring biomass from several fibre bundles at several heights. In these samples, biofilm structure could not be preserved. More comprehensive and structurally intact biofilm samples were obtained sacrificially at the end of the reactor run (day 630).

FISH analysis

Biofilm samples were collected after 630 days of operation by cutting one fibre at three different locations along its length (lower, middle and upper). Specimens containing both biofilm and membrane were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek Europe, Zoeterwoude, the Netherlands), frozen at −21°C, cut in 20 μm-thick sections by using a microtome, and mounted on gelatine-coated slides. Sectioned samples were dehydrated and sequentially probed with Fluorescein (FLUO), Cy3- and Cy5- tagged 16S rRNA probes (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA, Table 1), following procedures described elsewhere (Terada et al., 2010). Biofilm structure was further studied by staining the prepared sections with a general fluorescent nucleic acid stain following manufacturer's specifications (SYTO 60, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Hybridized and stained sections were inspected with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (CLSM, Leica TCS SP5, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with an Ar laser (488 nm), and two HeNe lasers (543 and 633 nm). Gain and pinhole settings were tuned for each registered image in order to allow unsaturated exposure values for all detected pixels. At least five micrographs obtained from specimens hybridized with probe combinations 1 and 5 (Table 1) were used to quantify the abundance of AOB, AnAOB and NOB using the image analysis software Daime (Daims et al., 2006). Images of SYTO stained biofilms were analysed with Leica AS AF Lite (Leica) and ImagePro (MediaCybernetics, Des Moines, IA, USA) software to determine biofilm porosities and probe intensity profiles along biofilm depth.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of biofilm mass (dry weight) using the MP FastDNA™ SPIN Kit (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. The quality of the extracted genomic DNA was checked by measuring its 260/280 nm absorbance ratio with a NanoDrop (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and was later stored at −20°C in Tris-EDTA buffer until further processing.

High-resolution tag-based 16S rRNA sequence library

Biofilm DNA sampled on day 630 was amplified with Phusion (Pfu) DNA Polymerase (ThermoFisher Scientific) and the 16S rDNA universal primers PRK341F (5′-C CTAYGGGRBGCAACAG-3′) and PRK806R (5′-GG ACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3′) (Yu et al., 2005) with 25 annealing and elongation cycles. Detailed description of the PCR amplification conditions have been described before (Masoud et al., 2011; Sundberg et al., 2013). Amplified DNA was purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Vento, the Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's protocol. In a second 15-cycle PCR round, barcodes and tags were added. All 16S rDNA fragments comprising the V3 and V4 hypervariable regions were pyrosequenced using a 454 FLX Titanium sequencer (Roche, Penzberg, Germany). Detailed description of the pyrosequencing preparation process can be found elsewhere (Farnelid et al., 2011).

Bioinformatic analyses

All raw 16S rDNA amplicons were processed and classified using the QIIME ( software package (Caporaso et al., 2010b). Chimera checking and denoising were performed with the software Ampliconnoise (Quince et al. 2011). Retrieved sequences were clustered at 97% evolutionary similarity and aligned against the Greengenes reference set (DeSantis et al., 2006) using the Pynast algorithm (Caporaso et al., 2010a). Taxonomy index of each functional guild is given in Table S2. Phylogenetic trees were created in ARB using library sequences of interest together with selected representatives from a small subunit (SSU) reference library (SSU Ref. Nr. 111 Silva). Statistical calculations and phylogenetic comparisons were carried out using R software (R Development Core Team, 2012).

Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Biofilm DNA sampled and extracted throughout the whole operational period (days 0, 90, 150, 390, 480 and 630) was subject to qPCR to determine the numbers of AOB, NOB, AnAOB and denitrifying bacteria, based on appropriate 16S rRNA targets or functional genes (Table 3). Details on the procedure can be found elsewhere (Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010; Terada et al., 2010).

Table 3. Primers and conditions used for the quantification of bacterial numbers by qPCR
PrimersTarget OrganismTarget moleculeSequence (5′-3′)Reference



All BacteriaEubacterial 16S rRNA gene



Lane, 1991; Ferris et al., 1996




β-proteobacterial AOBs16S RNA gene




Kowalchuk et al., 1997; Hermansson and Lindgren, 2001



Nitrobacter NOB16S RNA gene



Degrange and Bardin, 1995



Nitrospira NOB16S RNA gene



Graham et al., 2007



Nitrobacter/Nitrococcus NOBnxrA gene



Poly et al., 2008; Wertz et al., 2008



AnAOB16S RNA gene



Tsushima et al., 2007



AnAOBHzo gene



Park et al., 2010b



Denitrifying bacterianirS gene



Throbäck et al., 2004



Denitrifying bacterianirK gene



Hallin and Lindgren, 1999

Microelectrode measurements

Oxygen Clark-type microsensors were constructed to measure DO concentrations within the biofilm. Preparation, calibration and microsensor measurement were performed as previously described (Revsbech, 1989; Pellicer-Nàcher et al., 2010).


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information

The authors would like to thank Ms Lene Kirsten Jensen and Dr Marlene Mark Jensen for their assistance in conducting the presented qPCR analyses, Dr. Frank Schreiber for executing the presented microsensor measurements, Ms Gizem Multlu for her assistance in the FISH work and Dr Arnaud Dechesne for his valuable comments on the manuscript. Ms Annie Ravn Petersen is greatly thanked for her valuable help with the cryostat microtome.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information
  • Blackburne, R., Yuan, Z.G., and Keller, J. (2008) Partial nitrification to nitrite using low dissolved oxygen concentration as the main selection factor. Biodegradation 19: 303312.
  • Braker, G., Fesefeldt, A., and Witzel, K.-P. (1998) Development of PCR primer systems for amplification of nitrite reductase genes (nirK and nirS) to detect denitrifying bacteria in environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 37693775.
  • Caporaso, J.G., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F.D., DeSantis, T.Z., Andersen, G.L., and Knight, R. (2010a) PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26: 266267.
  • Caporaso, J.G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F.D., Costello, E.K., et al. (2010b) QIIME allows analysis of high- throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7: 335336.
  • Casciotti, K., and Ward, B. (2001) Dissimilatory nitrite reductase genes from autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 22132221.
  • Daims, H., Lucker, S., and Wagner, M. (2006) Daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ Microbiol 8: 200213.
  • Degrange, V., and Bardin, R. (1995) Detection and counting of Nitrobacter populations in soil by PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 20932098.
  • DeSantis, T.Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E.L., Keller, K., et al. (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 50695072.
  • Downing, L.S., and Nerenberg, R. (2008) Effect of oxygen gradients on the activity and microbial community structure of a nitrifying, membrane-aerated biofilm. Biotechnol Bioeng 101: 11931204.
  • Farnelid, H., Andersson, A.F., Bertilsson, S., Al-Soud, W.A., Hansen, L.H., Sørensen, S., et al. (2011) Nitrogenase gene amplicons from global marine surface waters are dominated by genes of non-cyanobacteria. PLoS ONE 6: e19223.
  • Ferris, M.J., Muyzer, G., and Ward, D.M. (1996) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of 16S rRNA-defined populations inhabiting a hot spring microbial mat community. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 340346.
  • Finkmann, W., Altendorf, K., Stackebrandt, E., and Lipski, A. (2000) Characterization of N2O-producing Xanthomonas-like isolates from biofilters as Stenotrophomonas nitritireducens sp. nov., Luteimonas mephitis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Pseudoxanthomonas broegbernensis gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 273282.
  • Foesel, B.U., Gieseke, A., Schwermer, C., Stief, P., Koch, L., Cytryn, E., et al. (2008) Nitrosomonas Nm143-like ammonia oxidizers and Nitrospira marina-like nitrite oxidizers dominate the nitrifier community in a marine aquaculture biofilm. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63: 192204.
  • Geets, J., Boon, N., and Verstraete, W. (2006) Strategies of aerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria for coping with nutrient and oxygen fluctuations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58: 113.
  • Gieseke, A., Purkhold, U., Wagner, M., Amann, R., and Schramm, A. (2001) Community structure and activity dynamics of nitrifying bacteria in a phosphate-removing biofilm. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 13511362.
  • Gilmore, K.R., Terada, A., Smets, B.F., Love, N.G., and Garland, J.L. (2013) Autotrophic nitrogen removal in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor under continuous aeration: a demonstration. Environ Eng Sci 30: 3845.
  • Gonzalez, J.M., Portillo, M.C., Belda-Ferre, P., and Mira, A. (2012) Amplification by PCR artificially reduces the proportion of the rare biosphere in microbial communities. PLoS ONE 7: e29973.
  • van der Graaf, A.A.V., De Bruijn, P., Robertson, L.A., Jetten, M.S.M., Kuenen, J.G., van De Graaf, A.A., et al. (1996) Autotrophic growth of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing micro-organisms in a fluidized bed reactor. Microbiology 142: 21872196.
  • Graham D.W., Knapp C.W., Van Vleck E.S., Bloor K., Lane T.B., and Graham C.E. (2007) Experimental demonstration of chaotic instability in biological nitrification. ISME J 1: 385393.
  • Hallin, S., and Lindgren, P.-E. (1999) PCR Detection of genes encoding nitrite reductase in denitrifying bacteria PCR detection of genes encoding nitrite reductase in denitrifying bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 16521657.
  • Hallin, S., Lydmark, P., Kokalj, S., Hermansson, M., Sörensson, F., Jarvis, Å., et al. (2005) Community survey of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in full-scale activated sludge processes with different solids retention time. J Appl Microbiol 99: 629640.
  • Hermansson, A., and Lindgren, P.-E. (2001) Quantification of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in arable soil by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 972976.
  • Heylen, K., Gevers, D., Vanparys, B., Wittebolle, L., Geets, J., Boon, N., et al. (2006) The incidence of nirS and nirK and their genetic heterogeneity in cultivated denitrifiers. Environ Microbiol 8: 20122021.
  • Hu, B., Zheng, P., Tang, C., Chen, J., van der Biezen, E., Zhang, L., et al. (2010) Identification and quantification of anammox bacteria in eight nitrogen removal reactors. Water Res 44: 50145020.
  • van Hulle, S.W.H., Vandeweyer, H.J.P., Meesschaert, B.D., Vanrolleghem, P.A., Dejans, P., and Dumoulin, A. (2010) Engineering aspects and practical application of autotrophic nitrogen removal from nitrogen rich streams. Chem Eng J 162: 120.
  • Jetten, M.S.M., van Niftrik, L., Strous, M., Kartal, B., Keltjens, J.T., Op den Camp, H.J.M., et al. (2009) Biochemistry and molecular biology of anammox bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 44: 6584.
  • Juretschko, S., Loy, A., Lehner, A., and Wagner, M. (2002) The microbial community composition of a nitrifying-denitrifying activated sludge from an industrial sewage treatment plant analyzed by the full-cycle rRNA approach. Syst Appl Microbiol 25: 8499.
  • Kartal, B., Tan, N.C.G., van de Biezen, E., Kampschreur, M.J., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., and Jetten, M.S.M. (2010) Effect of nitric oxide on anammox bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 63046306.
  • Kostera, J., Youngblut, M.D., Slosarczyk, J.M., and Pacheco, A.A. (2008) Kinetic and product distribution analysis of NO center dot reductase activity in Nitrosomonas europaea hydroxylamine oxidoreductase. J Biol Inorg Chem 13: 10731083.
  • Kowalchuk, G.A., Stephen, J.R., De Boer, W., Prosser, J.I., Embley, T.M., and Woldendorp, J.W. (1997) Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in coastal sand dunes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 14891497.
  • Kuenen, J.G. (2008) Anammox bacteria: from discovery to application. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 320326.
  • Lackner, S., Terada, A., and Smets, B.F. (2008) Heterotrophic activity compromises autotrophic nitrogen removal in membrane-aerated biofilms: results of a modeling study. Water Res 42: 11021112.
  • Lane, D.J. (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. Stackebrandt, E. , and Goodfellow, M. (eds). New York, USA: Willey, pp. 115175.
  • Liu, T., Li, D., Zeng, H., Li, X., Liang, Y., Chang, X., et al. (2012) Distribution and genetic diversity of functional microorganisms in different CANON reactors. Bioresour Technol 123: 574580.
  • Loy, A., Maixner, F., Wagner, M., and Horn, M. (2007) probeBase – an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes: new features 2007. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D800D804.
  • Masoud, W., Takamiya, M., Vogensen, F.K., Lillevang, S., Al-Soud, W.A., Sørensen, S.J., et al. (2011) Characterization of bacterial populations in Danish raw milk cheeses made with different starter cultures by denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis and pyrosequencing. Int Dairy J 21: 142148.
  • Noophan, P., Figueroa, L.A., and Munakata-Marr, J. (2004) Nitrite oxidation inhibition by hydroxylamine: experimental and model evaluation. Water Sci Technol 50: 295304.
  • Okabe, S., and Kamagata, Y. (2010) Wastewater treatment. In Environmental Molecular Microbiology. Liu, W.T. , and Jansson, J.K. (eds). Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press, pp. 191210.
  • Okabe, S., Kindaichi, T., and Ito, T. (2005) Fate of 14C-labeled microbial products derived from nitrifying bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 39873994.
  • Park, H., Rosenthal, A., Jezek, R., Ramalingam, K., Fillos, J., and Chandran, K. (2010a) Impact of inocula and growth mode on the molecular microbial ecology of anaerobic ammonia oxidation (anammox) bioreactor communities. Water Res 44: 50055013.
  • Park, H., Rosenthal, A., Ramalingam, K., Fillos, J., and Chandran, K. (2010b) Linking community profiles, gene expression and N-removal in anammox bioreactors treating municipal anaerobic digestion reject water. Environ Sci Technol 44: 61106116.
  • Pei, A.Y., Oberdorf, W.E., Nossa, C.W., Agarwal, A., Chokshi, P., Gerz, E., et al. (2010) Diversity of 16S rRNA genes within individual prokaryotic genomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 38863897.
  • Pellicer-Nàcher, C., Sun, S.P., Lackner, S., Terada, A., Schreiber, F., Zhou, Q., et al. (2010) Sequential aeration of membrane-aerated biofilm reactors for high-rate autotrophic nitrogen removal: experimental demonstration. Environ Sci Technol 44: 76287634.
  • Poly, F., Wertz, S., Brothier, E., and Degrange, V. (2008) First exploration of Nitrobacter diversity in soils by a PCR cloning-sequencing approach targeting functional gene nxrA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63: 132140.
  • Quince, C., Lanzen, A., Davenport, R.J., and Turnbaugh, P.J. (2011) Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 118.
  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Revsbech, N.P. (1989) An oxygen microsensor with a guard cathode. Limnol Oceanogr 34: 474478.
  • Rowan, A.K., Moser, G., Gray, N., Snape, J.R., Fearnside, D., Curtis, T.P., et al. (2003) A comparitive study of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in lab-scale industrial wastewater treatment reactors. Water Sci Technol 48: 1724.
  • Schmidt, I., Sliekers, O., Schmid, M., Bock, E., Fuerst, J., Kuenen, J.G., et al. (2003) New concepts of microbial treatment processes for the nitrogen removal in wastewater. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27: 481492.
  • Schramm, A. (2003) In situ analysis of structure and activity of the nitrifying community in biofilms, aggregates, and sediments. Geomicrobiol J 20: 313334.
  • Schramm, A., De Beer, D., Gieseke, A., and Amann, R. (2000) Microenvironments and distribution of nitrifying bacteria in a membrane-bound biofilm. Environ Microbiol 2: 680686.
  • Schreiber, F., Wunderlin, P., Udert, K.M., and Wells, G.F. (2012) Nitric oxide and nitrous oxide turnover in natural and engineered microbial communities: biological pathways, chemical reactions and novel technologies. Front Microbiol 3: 124.
  • Sliekers, A.O., Derwort, N., Gomez, J.L.C., Strous, M., Kuenen, J.G., and Jetten, M.S.M. (2002) Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite in one single reactor. Water Res 36: 24752482.
  • Sliekers, A.O., Third, K.A., Abma, W., Kuenen, J.G., and Jetten, M.S.M. (2003) CANON and Anammox in a gas-lift reactor. FEMS Microbiol Lett 218: 339344.
  • van der Star, W.R.L., Miclea, A.I., van Dongen, U.G.J.M., Muyzer, G., Picioreanu, C., and van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. (2008) The membrane bioreactor: a novel tool to grow anammox bacteria as free cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 101: 286294.
  • Stoecker, K., Dorninger, C., Daims, H., and Wagner, M. (2010) Double labeling of oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (DOPE-FISH) improves signal intensity and increases rRNA accessibility. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 922926.
  • Sundberg, C., Al-Soud, W.A., Larsson, M., Alm, E., Yekta, S.S., Svensson, B.H., et al. (2013) 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 85: 612626.
  • Terada, A., Lackner, S., Tsuneda, S., and Smets, B.F. (2007) Redox-stratification controlled biofilm (ReSCoBi) for completely autotrophic nitrogen removal: the effect of co- versus counter-diffusion on reactor performance. Biotechnol Bioeng 97: 4051.
  • Terada, A., Lackner, S., Kristensen, K., and Smets, B.F. (2010) Inoculum effects on community composition and nitritation performance of autotrophic nitrifying biofilm reactors with counter-diffusion geometry. Environ Microbiol 12: 28582872.
  • Terada, A., Zhou, S., and Hosomi, M. (2011) Presence and detection of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria and appraisal of anammox process for high-strength nitrogenous wastewater treatment: a review. Clean Techn Environ Policy 13: 759781.
  • Throbäck, I.N., Enwall, K., Jarvis, A., and Hallin, S. (2004) Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49: 401417.
  • Tsushima, I., Kindaichi, T., and Okabe, S. (2007) Quantification of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in enrichment cultures by real-time PCR. Water Res 41: 785794.
  • Vázquez-Padín, J., Mosquera-Corral, A., Luis Campos, J., Méndez, R., and Revsbech, N.P. (2010) Microbial community distribution and activity dynamics of granular biomass in a CANON reactor. Water Res 44: 43594370.
  • Wang, R., Terada, A., Lackner, S., Smets, B.F., Henze, M., Xia, S., et al. (2009) Nitritation performance and biofilm development of co- and counter-diffusion biofilm reactors: modeling and experimental comparison. Water Res 43: 26992709.
  • Wertz, S., Poly, F., Le Roux, X., and Degrange, V. (2008) Development and application of a PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis tool to study the diversity of Nitrobacter-like nxrA sequences in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63: 261271.
  • Wüst, P.K., Horn, M.A., and Drake, H.L. (2011) Clostridiaceae and Enterobacteriaceae as active fermenters in earthworm gut content. ISME J 5: 92106.
  • Yu, Y., Lee, C., Kim, J., and Hwang, S. (2005) Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Bioeng 89: 670679.
  • Zhang, T.C., and Bishop, P.L. (1994) Evaluation of tortuosity factors and effective diffusivities in biofilms. Water Res 28: 22792287.
  • Zumft, W.G. (1997) Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 533616.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  6. Experimental procedures
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflict of Interest
  9. References
  10. Supporting Information

Table S1. Probes used for the detection of target organisms by in-situ fluorescent hybridization.

Table S2. Index of related taxonomy for each functional guild.

Fig. S1. Reactor performance and microbial community abundances during reactor operation (qPCR performed with primers targeting functional genes).

Fig. S2. Typical O2-mircoprofiles during aeration periods within an aeration cycle.

Fig. S3. Rarefaction curves of denoised sequences and shared and unique OTUs between triplicate samples.

Fig. S4. Phylogenic tree constructed with all the identified AOB, NOB and AnAOB sequences.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.