SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner society. Radiology 2005; 237: 395400.
  • 2
    Revel MP, Merlin A, Peyrard S et al. Software volumetric evaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 135142.
  • 3
    Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD et al. Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. Radiology 2002; 223: 798805.
  • 4
    Oda S, Awai K, Murao K et al. Volume-doubling time of pulmonary nodules with ground glass opacity at multi-detector CT: assessment with computer-aided three-dimensional volumetry. Acad Radiol 2011; 18: 6369.
  • 5
    Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Are FG. two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 2004; 231: 453458.
  • 6
    Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 2000; 217: 251256.
  • 7
    Honda O, Johkoh T, Sekiguchi J et al. Doubling time of lung cancer determined using three-dimensional volumetric software: comparison of squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2009; 66: 211217.
  • 8
    Oda S, Awai K, Murao K et al. Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 398406.
  • 9
    Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al. Progression of focal pure ground-glass opacity detected by low-dose helical computed tomography screening for lung cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 1723.
  • 10
    Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashima S et al. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 12521259.
  • 11
    Lindell RM, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ et al. Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histological features of 61 lung cancers. Radiology 2007; 242: 555562.
  • 12
    Terasaki H, Kato S, Matsuno Y et al. Lung adenocarcinomas, mixed subtype histopathologic basis for high-resolution computed tomography findings. J Thorac Imaging 2011; 26: 7481.
  • 13
    Iwano S, Okada T, Koike W et al. Semi-automatic volumetric measurement of lung cancer using multi-detector CT: effects of nodule characteristics. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 11791186.
  • 14
    Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL et al. Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT-phantom study. Radiology 2003; 228: 864870.
  • 15
    Bolte H, Riedel C, Jahnke T et al. Reproducibility of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 2835.
  • 16
    Linning E, Daqing M. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy – a chest CT phantom study. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 934939.
  • 17
    Petrou M, Quint LE, Nan B, Baker LH. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 306312.
  • 18
    Goo JM, Tongdee T, Tongdee R, Yeo K, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT. Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. Radiology 2005; 235: 850856.
  • 19
    Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Meyer CA et al. Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. Radiology 2003; 229: 184194.
  • 20
    Ravenel JG, Leue WM, Nietert PJ, Miller JV, Taylor KK, Silvestri GA. Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements – a phantom study. Radiology 2008; 247: 400408.