Get access

DNA barcoding for conservation, seed banking and ecological restoration of Acacia in the Midwest of Western Australia

Authors

  • Paul G. Nevill,

    Corresponding author
    1. School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia', Australia
    • Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, Western Australia', Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mark J. Wallace,

    1. Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, Western Australia', Australia
    2. School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia', Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joseph T. Miller,

    1. Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Siegfried L. Krauss

    1. Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, Western Australia', Australia
    2. School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia', Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: Paul G. Nevill, Fax: 618-9322-5064 E-mail: paul.nevill@bgpa.wa.gov.au

Abstract

We used DNA barcoding to address an important conservation issue in the Midwest of Western Australia, working on Australia's largest genus of flowering plant. We tested whether or not currently recommended plant DNA barcoding regions (matK and rbcL) were able to discriminate Acacia taxa of varying phylogenetic distances, and ultimately identify an ambiguously labelled seed collection from a mine-site restoration project. Although matK successfully identified the unknown seed as the rare and conservation priority listed A. karina, and was able to resolve six of the eleven study species, this region was difficult to amplify and sequence. In contrast, rbcL was straightforward to recover and align, but could not determine the origin of the seed and only resolved 3 of the 11 species. Other chloroplast regions (rpl32-trnL, psbA-trnH, trnL-F and trnK) had mixed success resolving the studied taxa. In general, species were better resolved in multilocus data sets compared to single-locus data sets. We recommend using the formal barcoding regions supplemented with data from other plastid regions, particularly rpl32-trnL, for barcoding in Acacia. Our study demonstrates the novel use of DNA barcoding for seed identification and illustrates the practical potential of DNA barcoding for the growing discipline of restoration ecology.

Ancillary