Performance of individual vs. group sampling for inferring dispersal under isolation-by-distance
Version of Record online: 3 FEB 2014
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Molecular Ecology Resources
Volume 14, Issue 4, pages 745–752, July 2014
How to Cite
Luximon, N., Petit, E. J. and Broquet, T. (2014), Performance of individual vs. group sampling for inferring dispersal under isolation-by-distance. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14: 745–752. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12224
- Issue online: 13 JUN 2014
- Version of Record online: 3 FEB 2014
- Accepted manuscript online: 9 JAN 2014 12:33AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 30 DEC 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 6 DEC 2013
- Manuscript Received: 1 OCT 2013
- ‘Marine Aliens and Climate Change’
|men12224-sup-0001-FigS1.pdf||application/PDF||444K||Figure S1 Mean pairwise genetic distance amongst individuals (â, in black) or groups (FST/(1−FST), in grey) averaged over all replicates of each simulation.|
|men12224-sup-0002-FigS2.pdf||application/PDF||444K||Figure S2 Coverage probability of 95% confidence intervals around σ2 estimates from the regression of genetic vs geographic distances between pairs of individuals (black) or groups (grey).|
Table S1 Literature survey of empirical Dσ2 values estimated from significant IBD patterns for animal and plant case studies that investigated two-dimensional spatial genetic structure (the product Dσ2 has a different scale in 1D studies, Rousset 1997). This survey is complementary to that of Vekemans & Hardy (2004).
Table S2 Simulation conditions.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.