Highways versus pipelines: contributions of two fungal transport mechanisms to efficient bioremediation
Version of Record online: 24 OCT 2012
© 2012 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Volume 5, Issue 2, pages 211–218, April 2013
How to Cite
Banitz, T., Johst, K., Wick, L. Y., Schamfuß, S., Harms, H. and Frank, K. (2013), Highways versus pipelines: contributions of two fungal transport mechanisms to efficient bioremediation. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 5: 211–218. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12002
- Issue online: 5 MAR 2013
- Version of Record online: 24 OCT 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 28 SEP 2012 12:47AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 23 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 19 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Received: 24 MAY 2012
Vol. 6, Issue 4, 414, Version of Record online: 1 JUL 2014
Fig. S1. Time to reach different degradation levels under both kinds of spatial heterogeneities in combination (heterogeneous bacterial dispersal conditions and heterogeneous initial substrate concentrations), without and with different transportation networks (cf. column titles). Favourable and unfavourable bacterial dispersal conditions covered 50% of the simulation area respectively, at an intermediate degree of spatial clumping (e.g. Fig. 1E). One hundred simulation runs were performed for each scenario. Subplots show the simulated time until bacteria have consumed 25%, 50%, 75% and 99% of the substrate (different line types, cf. legend), plotted versus spatial configuration of networks (networks 1–3, cf. Fig. 1B–D) when networks were present. Subplots comprise medians, boxes covering the interquartile range of values (between 25th and 75th percentile), whiskers extending to values not more than 1.5-fold out of this range and outliers (plusses).
A–D. Fifty per cent of the area initially contained substrate, lowest degree of clumping (e.g. Fig. 1F).
E–H. Fifty per cent of the area initially contained substrate, highest degree of clumping (e.g. Fig. 1G).
I–L. Twenty per cent of the area initially contained substrate, highest degree of clumping (e.g. Fig. 1H). Note the logarithmic scale and much larger range of the time axis (compared with subplots; A–H).
Appendix S1. Combinations of heterogeneous bacterial dispersal conditions and heterogeneous initial substrate distributions.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.