• Gandy, A. (2009) Sequential implementation of Monte Carlo Tests with uniformly bounded resampling risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 15041511.
  • Hauschke, D. & Steinijans, V.W. (2000) The U.S. draft guidance regarding population and individual bioequivalence approaches: comments by a research-based pharmaceutical company. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 27692774.
  • Manly, B.F.J. (2007) Randomisation, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Massaro, M. & Blair, D. (2003) Comparison of population numbers of yellow-eyed penguins, Megadyptes antipodes, on Stewart Island and on adjacent cat-free islands. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 27, 107113.
  • Neuhäuser, M. (2009) The importance of the biological system underlying the data when choosing a statistical test: why penguins need to be treated differently to parasites. Animal Behaviour, 77, E1E3.
  • Neuhäuser, M. (2012) Nonparametric Statistical Tests: A Computational Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
  • Ruxton, G.D. (2006) The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 688690.
  • Wellek, S. (2000) On a reasonable disaggregate criterion of population bioequivalence admitting of resampling-free testing procedures. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 27552767.