SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A. & Kenward, R.E. (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology, 74, 13131325.
  • Barbacki, S. & Fisher, R.A. (1936) A test of the supposed precision of systematic arrangements. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 183193.
  • Beyer, H.L., Haydon, D.T., Morales, J.M., Frair, J.L., Hebblewhite, M., Mitchell, M. & Matthiopoulos, J. (2010) The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, Biological sciences, 365, 22332244.
  • Bingham, R.L., Brennan, L.A. & Ballard, B.M. (2010) Discrepancies between Euclidean distance and compositional analyses of resource selection data with known parameters. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 582587.
  • Conner, L.M. & Plowman, B.W. (2001) Using Euclidean distances to assess nonrandom habitat use. Radio Tracking and Animal Populations (eds J.J. Millspaugh & J.M. Marzluff), pp. 276288. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Conner, L.M., Smith, M.D. & Burger, L. (2003) A comparison of distance-based and classification-based analyses of habitat use. Ecology, 84, 526531.
  • Conner, L.M., Smith, M.D. & Burger, L. (2005) A comparison of distance-based and classification-based analyses of habitat use: reply. Ecology, 86, 31253129.
  • Cox, J.J., Maehr, D.S. & Larkin, J.L. (2006) Florida panther habitat use: new approach to an old problem. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 17781785.
  • Dussault, C., Ouellet, J.P. & Courtois, R. (2005) A comparison of distance-based and classification-based analyses of habitat use: comment. Ecology, 86, 31193125.
  • Erickson, W.P., McDonald, T.L. & Skinner, R. (1998) Habitat selection using GIS data: a case study. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 296310.
  • Fisher, R.A. (1926) The arrangement of field experiments. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture (London), 33, 503513.
  • Fisher, R.A. (1936) The half-drill strip system agricultural experiments. Nature, 138, 1101.
  • Fisher, R.A. (1971) The Design of Experiments, 9th edn. Hafner, New York.
  • Gossett, W.S. “Student” (1936) The half drill strip system agricultural experiments. Nature, 138, 971972.
  • Gossett, W.S. “Student” (1938) Comparison between balanced and random arrangement of field plots. Biometrika, 29, 363379.
  • Greenberg, B.G. (1951) Why randomize? Biometrics, 7, 309322.
  • Hurlbert, S.H. (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187211.
  • Johnson, D.H. (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61, 6571.
  • Kautz, R., Kawula, R., Hoctor, T., Comiskey, J., Jansen, D., Jennings, D., Kasbohm, J., Mazzotti, F., McBride, R., Richardson, L. & Root, K. (2006) How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, 130, 118133.
  • Land, E.D., Shindle, D.B., Kawula, R.J., Benson, J.F., Lotz, M.A. & Onorato, D.P. (2008) Florida panther habitat selection analysis of concurrent GPS and VHF telemetry data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 633639.
  • Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L. & Erickson, W.P. (2002) Resource Selection by Animals, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  • McLoughlin, P.D., Morris, D.W., Fortin, D., Vander Wal, E. & Contasti, A.L. (2010) Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79, 412.
  • Moyer, A.M., McCown, J.W. & Oli, M.K. (2008) Scale-dependent habitat selection by female Florida black bears in Ocala National Forest, Florida. Southeastern Naturalist, 7, 111124.
  • Neu, C.W., Byers, C.R. & Peek, J.M. (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 43, 760765.
  • Obbard, M.E., Coady, M.B., Pond, B.A., Schaefer, J.A. & Burrows, F.G. (2010) A distance-based analysis of habitat selection by American black bears (Ursus americanus) on the Bruce Peninsula, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 88, 10631076.
  • Onorato, D.P., Criffield, M., Lotz, M., Cunningham, M., McBride, R., Leone, E.H., Bass, O.L. Jr & Hellgren, E.C. (2011) Habitat selection by critically endangered Florida panthers across the diel period: implications for land management and conservation. Animal Conservation, 14, 196205.
  • Parra, G.J. (2006) Resource partitioning in sympatric delphinids: space-use and habitat preferences of Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 862874.
  • Van Etten, K.W., Wilson, K.R. & Crabtree, R.L. (2007) Habitat use of red foxes in Yellowstone National Park based on snow tracking and telemetry. Journal of Mammalogy, 88, 14981507.
  • Yates, F. (1939) The comparative advantages of systematic and randomized arrangements in the design of agricultural and biological experiments. Biometrika, 30, 440466.