• 1
    Heitz C, Eyck RT, Smith M, Fitch M. Simulation in medical student education: survey of clerkship directors in emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med. 2011; 12:45560.
  • 2
    Okuda Y, Bond W, Bonfante G, et al. National growth in simulation training within emergency medicine residency programs, 2003-2008. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15:11136.
  • 3
    McLaughlin S, Fitch MT, Goyal DG, et al. Simulation in graduate medical education 2008: a review for emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15:111729.
  • 4
    Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003; 78:7838.
  • 5
    Gordon JA, Vozenilek JA. 2008 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:9717.
  • 6
    Bond WF, Lammers RL, Spillane LL, et al. The use of simulation in emergency medicine: a research agenda. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14:35363.
  • 7
    Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011; 306:97888.
  • 8
    McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011; 86:70611.
  • 9
    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27:1028.
  • 10
    Fernandez R, Wang E, Vozenilek JA, et al. Simulation center accreditation and programmatic benchmarks: a review for emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17:1093103.
  • 11
    Chakravarthy B, Ter Haar E, Bhat SS, McCoy CE, Denmark TK, Lotfipour S. Simulation in medical school education: review for emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med. 2011; 12:4616.
  • 12
    Fritz PZ, Gray T, Flanagan B. Review of mannequin-based high-fidelity simulation in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas. 2008; 20:19.
  • 13
    McFetrich J. A structured literature review on the use of high fidelity patient simulators for teaching in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. 2006; 23:50911.
  • 14
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62:100612.
  • 15
    Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007; 298:10029.
  • 16
    Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008; 300:118196.
  • 17
    Borenstein M. Effect sizes for continuous data. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009, pp 22135.
  • 18
    Morris SB, DeShon RP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychol Methods. Mar 2002; 7:10525.
  • 19
    Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
  • 20
    Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0. 2011. Available at: Accessed Nov 28, 2012.
  • 21
    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
  • 22
    McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Medical education featuring mastery learning with deliberate practice can lead to better health for individuals and populations. Acad Med. 2011; 86:e89.
  • 23
    Lammers RL. Learning and retention rates after training in posterior epistaxis management. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15:11819.
  • 24
    Auerbach M, Kessler D, Foltin JC. Repetitive pediatric simulation resuscitation training. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011; 27:2931.
  • 25
    Agazio JB, Pavlides CC, Lasome CE, Flaherty NJ, Torrance RJ. Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator in sustainment training. Mil Med. 2002; 167:8937.
  • 26
    Davis DP, Buono C, Ford J, Paulson L, Koenig W, Carrison D. The effectiveness of a novel, algorithm-based difficult airway curriculum for air medical crews using human patient simulators. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007; 11:729.
  • 27
    Hoadley TA. Learning advanced cardiac life support: a comparison study of the effects of low- and high-fidelity simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009; 30:915.
  • 28
    Thomas EJ, Williams AL, Reichman EF, Lasky RE, Crandell S, Taggart WR. Team training in the neonatal resuscitation program for interns: teamwork and quality of resuscitations. Pediatrics. 2010; 125:53946.
  • 29
    Lee CC, Im M, Kim TM, et al. Comparison of traditional advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) course instruction vs. a scenario-based, performance oriented team instruction (SPOTI) method for Korean paramedic students. J Emerg Med. 2010; 38:8992.
  • 30
    Stratton SJ, Kane G, Gunter CS, et al. Prospective study of manikin-only versus manikin and human subject endotracheal intubation training of paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 1991; 20:13148.
  • 31
    Trooskin SZ, Rabinowitz S, Eldridge C, McGowan DE, Flancbaum L. Teaching endotracheal intubation using animals and cadavers. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1992; 7:17982.
  • 32
    Cummings AJ, Getz MA. Evaluation of a novel animal model for teaching intubation. Teach Learn Med. 2006; 18:3169.
  • 33
    Cho J, Kang GH, Kim EC, et al. Comparison of manikin versus porcine models in cricothyrotomy procedure training. Emerg Med J. 2008; 25:7324.
  • 34
    Yang JH, Kim YM, Chung HS, et al. Comparison of four manikins and fresh frozen cadaver models for direct laryngoscopic orotracheal intubation training. Emerg Med J. 2010; 27:136.
  • 35
    van Stralen DW, Rogers M, Perkin RM, Fea S. Retrograde intubation training using a mannequin. Am J Emerg Med. 1995; 13:502.
  • 36
    Bond WF, Deitrick LM, Eberhardt M, et al. Cognitive versus technical debriefing after simulation training. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13:27683.
  • 37
    Low D, Healy D, Rasburn N. The use of the BERCI DCI Video Laryngoscope for teaching novices direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2008; 63:195201.
  • 38
    Youngquist ST, Henderson DP, Gausche-Hill M, Goodrich SM, Poore PD, Lewis RJ. Paramedic self-efficacy and skill retention in pediatric airway management. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15:1295303.
  • 39
    Girzadas DV, Jr., Antonis MS, Zerth H, et al. Hybrid simulation combining a high fidelity scenario with a pelvic ultrasound task trainer enhances the training and evaluation of endovaginal ultrasound skills. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16:42935.
  • 40
    Hein C, Owen H, Plummer J. A training program for novice paramedics provides initial laryngeal mask airway insertion skill and improves skill retention at 6 months. Simul Healthc. 2010; 5:339.
  • 41
    Orde S, Celenza A, Pinder M. A randomised trial comparing a 4-stage to 2-stage teaching technique for laryngeal mask insertion. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:168791.
  • 42
    Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2008; 95:108897.
  • 43
    Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2010; 85:1589602.
  • 44
    Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ. 2012; 46:63647.
  • 45
    Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol. 2002; 167:12437.
  • 46
    Cook DA, Hamstra S, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013; 35:e844875.
  • 47
    Reed DA, Beckman TJ, Wright SM, Levine RB, Kern DE, Cook DA. Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23:9037.
  • 48
    Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S. Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2011; 45:22738.
  • 49
    Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007; 41:73745.
  • 50
    Baernstein A, Liss HK, Carney PA, Elmore JG. Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969-2007. JAMA. 2007; 298:103845.
  • 51
    Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery. 2012 Aug 9; [Epub ahead of print].