SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. AbstractResumen
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Objectives

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after acute stroke thrombolysis is associated with poor outcomes. Previous investigations of the relationship between preexisting antiplatelet use and the safety of intravenous (IV) thrombolysis have been limited by low event rates. The objective of this study was to determine whether preexisting antiplatelet therapy increased the risk of ICH following acute stroke thrombolysis. The primary hypothesis was that antiplatelet use would not be associated with radiographic evidence of ICH after controlling for relevant confounders.

Methods

Consecutive cases of thrombolysis patients treated in the emergency department (ED) were identified using multiple methods. Retrospective data were collected from four hospitals from 1996 to 2004 and 24 other hospitals from 2007 to 2010 as part of a cluster-randomized trial. The same chart abstraction tool was used during both time periods, and data were subjected to numerous quality control checks. Hemorrhages were classified using a prespecified methodology: ICH was defined as presence of hemorrhage in radiographic interpretations of follow-up imaging (primary outcome). Symptomatic ICH (sICH) was defined as radiographic ICH with associated clinical worsening. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to adjust for clinical factors previously identified to be related to postthrombolysis ICH. Sensitivity analyses were conducted where the unadjusted and adjusted results from this study were combined with those of previously published external studies on this topic via meta-analytic techniques.

Results

There were 830 patients included, with 47% having documented preexisting antiplatelet treatment. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 69 (±15) years, and the cohort was 53% male. The unadjusted proportion of patients with any ICH was 15.1% without antiplatelet use and 19.3% with antiplatelet use (absolute risk difference = 4.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.2% to 9.6%); for sICH this was 6.1% without antiplatelet use and 9% with antiplatelet use (absolute risk difference = 3.1%, 95% CI = −1% to 6.7%). After adjusting for confounders, antiplatelet use was not significantly associated with radiographic ICH (odds ratio [OR] = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8 to 1.7) or sICH (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.7 to 2.2). In patients 81 years and older, there was a higher risk of radiographic ICH (absolute risk difference = 11.9%, 95% CI = 0.1% to 23.6%). The meta-analyses combined the findings of this investigation with previous similar work and found increased unadjusted risks of radiographic ICH (absolute risk difference = 4.9%, 95% CI = 0.7% to 9%) and sICH (absolute risk difference = 4%, 95% CI = 2.3% to 5.6%). The meta-analytic adjusted OR of sICH for antiplatelet use was 1.6 (95% CI = 1.1 to 2.4).

Conclusions

The authors did not find that preexisting antiplatelet use was associated with postthrombolysis ICH or sICH in this cohort of community treated patients. Preexisting tobacco use, younger age, and lower severity were associated with lower odds of sICH. The meta-analyses demonstrated small, but statistically significant increases in the absolute risk of radiographic ICH and sICH, along with increased odds of sICH in patients with preexisting antiplatelet use.

Resumen

¿Influye el Tratamiento Antiagregante Previo en la Hemorragia Intracraneal tras la Trombolisis en los Pacientes con Ictus Isquémicos Tratados en la Comunidad? Un Estudio Observacional

Objetivos

La hemorragia intracraneal (HIC) tras la trombolisis de un ictus agudo se asocia con malos resultados. Los estudios previos de la relación entre el uso de antiagregantes y la seguridad de la trombolisis intravenosa (IV) han estado limitados por los porcentajes bajos de sucesos. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si el tratamiento antiagregante previo está asociado con la evidencia radiológica de HIC tras el control por los factores de confusión relevantes.

Metodología

Se identificaron los casos consecutivos de pacientes tratados con trombolisis en el SU de múltiples formas. Se recogieron los datos de forma retrospectiva de cuatro hospitales de 1996 a 2004 y de 24 hospitales distintos de 2007 a 2010 como parte de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado en racimos. Se utilizó la misma tabla resumen de historia clínica durante ambos periodos de tiempo y los datos fueron sometidos a numerosos controles de calidad. Las hemorragias se clasificaron siguiendo una metodología preestablecida: la HIC se definió como la presencia de hemorragia en las interpretaciones radiológicas de las imágenes de seguimiento (resultado primario); y la HIC sintomática (HICs) se definió como la HIC radiológica asociada con un empeoramiento clínico. Se construyó un modelo multivariable de regresión logística para ajustar los factores clínicos previamente identificados como relacionados con un la HIC tras la trombolisis. Los análisis de sensibilidad se realizaron mediante técnicas de metanálisis y se combinaron los resultados ajustados y no ajustados de esta investigación con los estudios externos previamente publicados en este tema.

Resultados

Se incluyeron 830 pacientes, de los cuales el 47% tenía documentado tratamiento antiagregante previo. La media de edad fue de 69 años, y el 53% eran varones. La proporción no ajustada de pacientes con cualquier tipo de HIC fue del 15,1% sin toma de antiagregante y del 19,3% con la toma de antiagregante (diferencia del riesgo absoluto 4,2%, IC 95% = −1,2% a 9,6%); y para las HICs fue del 6,1% sin toma de antiagregantes y del 9% con la toma de antiagregantes (diferencia absoluta del riesgo 3,1%, IC 95% = −1% a 6,7%). Tras ajustar por los factores de confusión, la toma de antiagregantes no se asoció de forma significativa con la HIC radiológica (OR 1,1, IC 95% = 0,8 a 1,7]) o HICs (OR 1,3, IC 95% = 0,7 a 2,2). En los pacientes de 81 años o más, hubo mayor riesgo de HIC radiológica (diferencia de riesgo absoluta 11,9%, IC 95% = 0,1% a 23,6%). El metanálisis que combinó los hallazgos de esta investigación con los trabajos similares previos encontró un riesgo no ajustado incrementado para la HIC radiológica (diferencia absoluta del riesgo 4,9%, IC 95% = 0,7% a 9%) y de HICs (diferencia absoluta del riesgo 4%, IC 95% = 2,3% a 5,6%). La odds ratio ajustada del metanálisis de HICs para los pacientes con tratamiento de antigregantes fue de 1,6 (IC 95% = 1,1 a 2,4).

Conclusiones

Los autores no encontraron que la toma previa de antigregantes se asocie con la HIC o la HICs tras la trombolisis en esta cohorte de pacientes tratados en la comunidad. El consumo previo de tabaco, la edad más joven y la menor gravedad se asociaron con odds ratio menores de HICs. El metanálisis demostró un incremento bajo, aunque estadísticamente significativo, de riesgo absoluto de HIC radiológica o de HICs, con una odds ratio aumentada de HICs en los pacientes con toma previa de antiagregantes.

Treatment of acute stroke with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) reduces disability in appropriately selected patients.[1, 2] Concerns over safety, specifically symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), have contributed to relatively limited use of this treatment and slow universal acceptance in emergency medicine.[3] To address these concerns and improve patient outcomes, the development of prediction rules to select patients who have a lower risk of post-tPA sICH is a high priority. To date, such decision rules have had limited discriminatory ability.[4, 5]

In the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the combination of thrombolytics with a variety of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants is safe and efficacious.[6] The same has not been established in stroke. An early randomized controlled thrombolysis trial in acute stroke found that the combination of aspirin and streptokinase increased the risk of sICH compared to streptokinase alone.[7] Subsequent stroke tPA trials treatment protocols mandated subjects not receive antiplatelet treatment until 24 hours posttreatment.[1, 2, 8] Following demonstration of tPA efficacy in the NINDS tPA stroke study, this restriction on posttreatment antiplatelet use became part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved package insert. The same trials did not, however, exclude patients with preexisting antiplatelet use from study entry, despite the relatively long duration of effect of most antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel).

Because patients with prior antiplatelet use have been included in stroke thrombolysis trials and postmarketing surveillance observational studies, several retrospective investigations have provided conflicting conclusions regarding the relationship between antiplatelet use and ICH.[9-16] Unadjusted analyses typically show a higher absolute risk of ICH in patients with existing antiplatelet use, but adjusted analyses accounting for age, severity, and other potential confounders have been conflicting. Therefore, our objective was to determine whether preexisting antiplatelet therapy was associated with ICH following tPA treatment for ischemic stroke, with particular exploration of the effects of age, as many studies have restricted thrombolysis patients to those younger than 80 years. The primary hypothesis was that antiplatelet use would not be associated with radiographic evidence of ICH after controlling for relevant confounders. Our secondary hypothesis was that antiplatelet use would not be associated with sICH.

Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. AbstractResumen
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Study Design

This was a secondary, retrospective, observational study using data collected in two studies of tPA use in stroke in Michigan: the Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Four Emergency Departments (SIT-ED) project and the Increasing Stroke Treatment through Interventional Behavior Change Tactics (INSTINCT) trial, which have been previously described.[17, 18] The University of Michigan institutional review board (IRB) and all applicable local IRBs approved the protocols for SIT-ED and INSTINCT.

Study Setting and Population

The SIT-ED project was a retrospective case series of all stroke patients receiving tPA within four hospitals; INSTINCT was a cluster-randomized trial including all cases of stroke tPA treatment within 24 randomly selected community hospitals. All stroke patients aged 18 years or greater receiving IV tPA were identified from all 28 hospitals during the study periods. Cases were identified by several methods, including ED logs, institutional stroke registries, pharmacy medication administration records, and hospital billing records. Clinical data were only available from the index hospitalizations; however, full records of the initial hospitalizations were obtained for cases that were transferred from an INSTINCT hospital to an institution not participating in the trial.

Study Protocol

Data were collected from four hospitals associated with the SIT-ED project (1996 to 2004) and 24 additional community hospitals located in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan from the INSTINCT trial (2007–2010). The general characteristics of the hospitals from both studies are summarized in Table 1. The same data collection instrument and quality control processes were used for both studies. Trained clinical abstractors collected all the data from source documents, double review of key data elements was conducted, and agreement was excellent, with agreement of 99% for key data elements (thrombolysis inclusion criteria, presence of ICH). The abstractors were not aware of this study hypothesis when collecting data, as this investigation was designed after the completion of data analysis for both the SIT-ED project and the INSTINCT trial.

Table 1. Characteristics of the Study Hospitals
SIT-ED Hospital Characteristics
HospitalLocationUrban/RuralInpatient BedsAdult ED VolumeTeaching Hospital Neurology
1Ann ArborUrban79250,918YesYes
2YpsilantiUrban52965,259YesYes
3FlintUrban46354,707aYesYes
4JacksonRural41152,500NoYes
INSTINCT Hospital Characteristics, n = 24N (%)
  1. Characteristics of the hospitals included from 1996–2004 (SIT-ED) and 2007–2010 (INSTINCT). Different data collection strategies were used to summarize hospital data.

  2. INSTINCT = Increasing Stroke Treatment through Interventional Behavior Change Tactics; SIT-ED = Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Four Emergency Departments.

  3. a

    This hospital reported combined adult and pediatric volume.

Inpatient Beds
<1004 (17)
101–25011 (46)
251–5006 (25)
>5003 (13)
Annual ED volume (adult)
<20,0007 (29)
20,001–40,0008 (33)
40,001–60,0008 (33)
60,001–80,0001 (4)
General
Teaching hospital11 (46)
Neurology available22 (92)
Primary stroke center8 (33)
Urban8 (33)

Patient-level data including age, sex, stroke risk factors, and self-reported ethnicity were obtained from the medical record. Time of onset or time last known well was recorded when it was explicitly stated in the medical record. When not specifically documented, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was estimated using a previously described method.[19] Preexisting use of antiplatelet agents was a binary field in the data collection instrument and was determined by study team abstractors. The last recorded blood pressure prior to treatment and first recorded blood glucose were abstracted from the ED record as pretreatment variables. Posttreatment protocol deviations were defined as antiplatelet or anticoagulant use within 24 hours of tPA treatment or blood pressure not treated when out of range for two or more measurements at least 30 minutes apart.

Hemorrhages were classified using a prespecified methodology: ICH was defined as presence of hemorrhage in radiographic interpretations (primary outcome of this investigation) of any follow-up neuroimaging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) obtained during initial hospitalization. The timing of follow-up neuroimaging was at the discretion of the treating teams; the reports of all neuroimaging studies obtained during the first 10 days of the initial hospitalization were reviewed. The main secondary outcome was sICH, defined as radiographic ICH with associated clinical worsening based on retrospective review of hospital chart (NINDS tPA trial definition).

Sample Size

Prior to conducting the analysis, we hypothesized that a clinically meaningful increase in the radiographic ICH rate would be from 17% to 25.3% (50% relative increase). Using a two-sided binomial difference in proportions, with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 and 80% power, a sample size of 377 patients per group (with and without antiplatelets) was estimated. To detect a 25% relative increase (range = 17% to 21.25%), 1,341 patients per group would be needed; to detect a 100% relative increase (range = 17% to 34%), 101 patients per group would be needed.

Data Analysis

Demographics and clinical characteristics are summarized using descriptive statistics (means with standard deviation [SD], medians with interquartile ranges [IQR], or proportions as appropriate). The raw proportions for the primary outcome for patients with and without preexisting antiplatelet use and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to adjust for clinical factors previously identified to be related to postthrombolysis ICH with all variables selected a priori. In addition to our variable of interest, preexisting antiplatelet use, the model included age, NIHSS, pretreatment systolic blood pressure, onset to treatment interval, pretreatment blood glucose, tobacco use, and presence of posttreatment protocol violations. Continuous variables other than onset to treatment interval were divided into quartiles to allow for potential nonlinear associations between the selected covariates and the outcome. Due to fewer sICH events, the multivariable model for this endpoint was constructed with continuous variables dichotomized. In addition, a propensity score was calculated using logistic regression for each case to provide a single summary measure of the likelihood that any individual was on an antiplatelet agent given his or her age, sex, race, and vascular risk factor profile.[20] This was then added as a covariate to the final models measuring the association between ICH and antiplatelet use. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess for a trend in the rate of ICH over time; this was performed because neuroimaging use has changed over the time period. Specifically, MRI has become more common and may detect more ICH.[21] In addition, the risk difference for ICH comparing those with antiplatelet use to those without was calculated within each age quartile. SAS version 9.2 (SAS Corporation, Cary, NC) was used for analysis. We fitted the final main outcome model using two alternative techniques to account for clustering within hospitals—specifically hierarchical logistic regression with a random intercept for hospital and a logistic regression using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) accounting for clustering within hospitals. In addition, we calculated the radiographic and symptomatic ICH rates based on whether the patient had a follow-up CT versus MRI.

Sensitivity Analysis

To put the current investigation in the context of the previous understanding of the topic, we performed a structured literature review and used meta-analytic techniques to quantify how this investigation has updated our knowledge. To identify relevant studies, a PubMed search was conducted using the following search logic (thrombolys* OR alteplase OR tPA) AND stroke AND platelet aggregation inhibitors AND (cerebral hemorrhage OR intracranial hemorrhages). Studies were included if they reported the unadjusted proportions of patients with radiographic and/or sICH in accordance with the PRISMA statement.[22] Studies that reported a subset of our four summary measures (unadjusted risk difference for radiographic ICH, unadjusted risk difference for sICH, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for radiographic ICH, and aOR for sICH) were included in only the relevant analyses. For studies that used multiple definitions of sICH, the NINDS definition (any ICH plus any increased NIHSS or death within 1 week) was used, as this definition is conservative (generally assigning the highest proportion of hemorrhages to the symptomatic category) and has been most commonly reported across studies.[1] The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate a pooled estimate for the probability of radiographic and symptomatic hemorrhage following tPA for cases with and without preexisting antiplatelet use. In addition, estimates of the aOR for the association relating antiplatelet use to radiographic and sICH from the current and previous investigations were also combined using the DerSimonian and Laird method. R version 2.12.2 and R package meta (R Project, Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, WU Wein, Vienna, Austria), which includes functions for performing meta-analyses of studies reporting proportions and ORs, were used to conduct this portion of the analysis.[23] In the main analyses, patients without follow-up neuroimaging were assumed to be free of ICH, as the clinical teams may have elected to not perform repeat imaging in patients who were doing well.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. AbstractResumen
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Participants

A total of 830 patients were included (SIT-ED, n = 273; INSTINCT, n = 557). The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 2. A total of 388 patients (47%) had documented histories of taking anti-platelet agents. Patients with documented antiplatelet use had higher burdens of stroke and cardiovascular risk factors. Stroke severity and patient age were also higher in the antiplatelet group.

Table 2. Characteristics of the Study Population
CharacteristicsAntiplatelet UseNo Antiplatelet Use
Mean(±SD)Mean(±SD)Difference(95% Cl)
  1. Difference in means or binomial difference in proportions with 95% CI reported calculated by subtracting no antiplatelet use group from antiplatelet group.

  2. NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TIA = transient ischemic attack.

  3. a

    Items with CIs excluding 0.

Age (yr)74(±12.6)65(±16)8.16.2 to 10.1a
Onset to treatment (minutes) (n = 780)148(±40.8)151(±53.9)–2.7−9.5 to 4.1
Pretreatment
Blood glucose (mg/dL) (n = 820)137(±55.1)129(±42.9)8.51.8 to 15.2a
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) (n = 826)151(±21.7)147(±22)4.41.4 to 7.4a
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) (n = 826)78(±16.6)79(±15.3)–0.8−3 to 1.4
NIHSS13(±5.7)12(±5.8)0.80.1 to 1.6a
DemographicsPercentage(N)Percentage(N)Difference,%95% Cl
Female47.7(185)46.2(204)1.5−5.3 to 8.3
Non-Hispanic white80.9(314)78.3(346)2.6−2.9 to 8.2
African American7.7(30)10.0(44)–2.2−6.1 to 1.7
Other/unknown11.1(43)11.5(51)–0.5−4.8 to 3.9
Prior stroke27.6(107)9.0(40)18.513.3 to 23.7a
Prior TIA18.3(71)8.6(38)9.75.1 to 14.3a
Diabetes mellitus28.6(111)18.8(83)9.84.1 to 15.6a
Hypertension86.9(337)62.4(276)24.418.4 to 30.4a
Hyperlipidemia61.1(237)31.2(138)29.923.1 to 36.6a
Coronary artery disease50.8(197)16.1(71)34.728.3 to 41.1a
Congestive heart failure17.0(66)7.9(35)9.14.6 to 13.5a
Atrial fibrillation31.4(122)14.5(64)16.911.3 to 22.6a
Valvular heart disease9.8(38)4.5(20)5.31.8 to 8.7a
Smoking within 1 yr18.8(73)30.1(133)−11.3−17.2 to -5.4
Posttreatment deviations
Antiplatelet given within 24 hours (n = 829)10.3(40)11.5(51)−1.2−5.5 to 3.1
Anticoagulant given within 24 hours5.4(21)6.6(29)−1.1−4.4 to 2.1
Blood pressure maintained < 180/105 mm Hg (n = 816)21.4(83)15.8(70)5.60.3 to 10.8a

Outcome Data

Radiographic ICH was observed in 67 patients (15.2%) without preexisting antiplatelet use and 75 patients (19.3%) with preexisting antiplatelet use. The absolute difference was 4.2% (95% CI = −1.2% to 9.6%). Symptomatic ICH was observed in 27 patients (6.1%) without and 35 patients (9%) with preexisting antiplatelet use; the absolute difference was 3.1% (95% CI = −1% to 6.7%).

Main Results

In the fully adjusted model, there was no association of preexisting antiplatelet use with the primary outcome, radiographic ICH (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.68). Increasing severity, older age, and higher baseline blood glucose were associated with presence of any radiographic ICH. No association between antiplatelet use was seen with sICH (see Table 3). Patients who had a history of tobacco use had lower odds of sICH in the fully adjusted analysis. When the propensity score was added to these models, no meaningful change in the estimated associations was observed (data not shown). In addition, the hierarchical model and the GEE did not demonstrate a substantial effect of clustering within hospital (data not shown).

Table 3. Fully Adjusted Models for Any Radiographic ICH and sICH
CharacteristicsModel 1: Any ICHModel 2: sICH
aOR(95% CI)Category for Model 2aOR(95% CI)
  1. Age, severity, and glucose were divided into quartiles (Model 1) or dichotomized (Model 2) to allow for nonlinear effects. Model 1 fit was satisfactory (c-statistic = 0.704; Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test failed to reject hypothesis of lack of fit, p = 0.76) as was the fit of Model 2 (c-statistic = 0.719; Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, p = 0.14).

  2. Final models evaluating the relationship between ICH and antiplatelet use.

  3. aOR = adjusted OR; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; sICH = symptomatic ICH; TIA = transient ischemic attack.

Preexisting antiplatelet use1.13(0.76–1.68) 1.26(0.72–2.19)
Post-tPA treatment protocol deviations1.00(0.65–1.52) 1.57(0.90–2.75)
History of tobacco use0.70(0.40–1.24) 0.32(0.11–0.94)
Systolic blood pressure (10 mm Hg increase)1.07(0.97–1.17) 1.09(0.96–1.25)
Onset to treatment time (minutes)1.00(0.995–1.004) 0.997(0.99–1.004)
Baseline NIHSS
1–60.29(0.15–0.55)1–110.53(0.30–0.95)
7–110.33(0.19–0.55)   
12–150.72(0.44–1.17)12+Ref. 
16+Ref.    
Age (yr)
20–570.41(0.20–0.83)20–700.52(0.27–1.001)
58–70 0.80(0.47–1.37)   
71–700.83(0.51–1.37)71+Ref. 
81+Ref.    
Baseline blood glucose (mg/dL)
59–1010.50(0.28–0.91)59–1181.00(0.58–1.73)
102–1180.69(0.41–1.16)   
119–1440.83(0.50–1.39)119+Ref. 
145+Ref.    

Secondary Results

There was no increase in the presence of any radiographic ICH or sICH over time (see Data Supplement S1, available as supporting information in the online version of this paper). In the results stratified by age, there was an observed increased risk of radiographic ICH in patients 81 and older (11.9% absolute increase) who were taking antiplatelet agents compared to those who were not (Table 4). In 312 patients with follow-up MRI, 12 had sICH (3.9%) and 41 had radiographic ICH (13.1%). In the group of 468 patients without follow-up MRI, there were 413 with one or more follow-up CT and 55 with no follow-up neuroimaging; in this group there were 50 sICH (9.7%) and 101 radiographic ICH (19.5%). Of the 55 without follow-up neuroimaging, only eight had clinical worsening compared to arrival at the time of hospital discharge.

Table 4. Any ICH and Symptomatic ICH Stratified by Age
Age, yrOverall SeverityAntiplatelet UseNo-Antiplatelet UseAbsolute Risk Increase
NIHSS(IQR)No ICHICHICH%No ICHICHICH%RD,%(95% Cl)
  1. Binomial difference in proportions with 95% CI reported calculated by subtracting no antiplatelet use group from antiplatelet group. Stroke severity within each stratum summarized with median NIHSS and IQR.

  2. IQR = interquartile range; NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; RD = risk difference.

  3. a

    Items with CIs excluding 0.

Any ICH
20–5710(7–15)5158.9128117.91.0(−7.5 to 9.5)
58–7011(7–15)791213.21062217.2–4.0(−13.7 to 5.7)
71–8013(9–17)962117.9681820.9–3.0(−13.9 to 8.0)
81+14(9–18)873729.8731618.011.9(0.1 to 23.6)a
Symptomatic ICH
20–5710(7–15)5600.013542.9–2.9(−7.3 to 1.5)
58–7011(7–15)8655.512086.3–0.8(−7.1 to 5.6)
71–8013(9–17)107108.57978.10.4(−7.3 to 8.1)
81+14(9–18)1042016.18189.07.1(−2.1 to 16.3)

Sensitivity Analysis

The pooled estimate for the excess risk in antiplatelet-treated thrombolysis patients across all seven identified studies in the meta-analysis was 4.9% (95% CI = 0.7% to 9%) for any ICH and 4% (95% CI = 2.3% to 5.6%) for sICH. (The PRISMA flow chart and table of included studies are available in Data Supplement S2, available as supporting information in the online version of this paper.) The pooled adjusted OR for the association of antiplatelet use with any ICH was 1.3 (95% CI = 0.7 to 2.5) and with sICH was 1.6 (95% CI = 1.1 to 2.4). The results of the individual studies in the meta-analysis are included in Figure 1.

image

Figure 1. Meta-analyses with and without current investigation for risk difference and aORs. Results of meta-analyses. aOR = adjusted OR; AP = antiplatelet; RD = risk difference; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; sICH = symptomatic ICH. Risk difference is the absolute excess proportion of patients with ICH in patient with documented prestroke antiplatelet use versus those without. For example, in A, 4.9% more antiplatelet patients had radiographic evidence of ICH versus those not receiving antiplatelets when estimates across all studies were combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. AbstractResumen
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

In this cohort of 830 tPA-treated stroke patients, we found no significant association between prethrombolytic antiplatelet use and postthrombolytic risk of either radiographic or sICH. Unadjusted analyses identified a trend toward increased risk for both radiographic and sICH; however, after adjusting for important confounders (age, stroke severity, and hyperglycemia) no significant relationship was observed. These confounders have previously been associated with increased ICH risk in multivariable analysis.[24]

Our data also suggest that the risk of radiographic ICH increases with age, since the point estimates for the unadjusted absolute risk difference increase across the age strata, and the fully adjusted model shows possible excess risk in the group aged 81 years and older. This is an interesting area of potential future investi-gation, as the majority of patients included in the meta-analyses were from the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR), which restricted inclusion to ages 18 to 80 years.[12, 15]

In addition, the potential protective effect of preexisting tobacco use against symptomatic hemorrhage has been redemonstrated in this analysis. Nicotine increases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity (which deactivates therapeutic tPA treatment), although in clinical practice better recanalization has been observed in myocardial infarction and stroke in smokers.[25, 26] Since sICH may represent an end process of brain damage in situations where recanalization does not occur, one potential mechanism for the reduction of sICH among smokers may be better recanalization. It may also reflect the presence of the higher levels of PAI-1 in smokers, decreasing the effective half-life of exogenous tPA, thereby limiting the potential damage as parts of the ischemic penumbra progress to frank infarction and disruption of the blood–brain barrier. Nicotine may have promise as an agent to enhance the acute effectiveness and safety of tPA, although it may cause postischemic brain inflammation when administered continuously for days after experimental stroke.[27] Further studies are warranted, including translational animal models of thrombolysis-associated hemorrhage.

To put the current investigation in the context of the previous understanding of the topic, we performed a structured literature review and used meta-analytic techniques to quantify how this investigation has updated our knowledge. Overall, the point estimates for the radiographic and sICH proportions and aOR from the current investigation are congruent with the prior work in this area; however, the overall meta-analysis did estimate a small but statistically increased adjusted odds of sICH for patients who were on antiplatelet agents.

Limitations

This study has several important limitations. First, we do not have 90-day functional outcomes on the patients in the study, limiting our ability to determine what contribution the ICH had on the ultimate clinical outcome. Since many hemorrhages occur in patients with large strokes (high NIHSS) whose expected outcomes are poor, it is difficult to separate out the independent effect of ICH from the influence of a large ischemic stroke. Another important limitation of our investigation is our reliance on retrospective medical record review. For this reason our primary outcome was radiographic evidence of hemorrhage, which is easier to determine objectively from the medical record. This measure may be of more limited clinical utility, since small radiographic hemorrhages have not demonstrated impairment of ultimate functional outcome.[28] The current study was powered to identify a relatively large effect on ICH. Another limitation is the potential confounding effects of new stroke therapies over the time course of the study, which spanned 14 years. It is plausible that greater coexisting use of medications affecting platelet inhibition, such as statins or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, may complicate this relationship. To the best of our knowledge, no studies to date have had adequate numbers of events to detect any synergistic effects of these agents with antiplatelet use on increasing ICH.[29, 30] In addition, increasing numbers of patients are on alternate antiplatelet agents, particularly clopidogrel, either alone or in combination. Our current investigation collected antiplatelet use as a dichotomous variable, thus precluding inference regarding dosing and combinations. While subgroup analyses have been done in some of the prior evaluations, the majority of included patients have been on aspirin alone. Current estimates of the potential interaction between clopidogrel or combination treatments with stroke thrombolysis are imprecise; however, it does appear that some increased risk exists.[11] It is important to note that studies focusing on this have not contained enough patients on alternative regimens to allow generalizable conclusions for clinical practice. In addition, the antiplatelet group had a higher burden of vascular risk factors, which is not surprising; however, when we adjusted for residual confounding by vascular risk factors using propensity scores, the associations between antiplatelet use and hemorrhage were unchanged. Another consideration is the variable use of imaging and increasing use of MRI. The sensitivity of MRI versus CT for intracranial blood is an area of controversy in the radiologic literature, and over this time period it is unlikely that CT or MRI had substantially different performance.[31] Our finding that ICH did not increase over time, despite the likely increased popularity of MRI, lends credence to this, although going forward this may need to be examined as maximally heme-sensitive sequences on MRI (gradient echo) are becoming more commonly used. In addition, we found the rates of radiographic ICH to actually be lower when follow-up MRI was performed. Finally, the context analyses were designed to place the current results in perspective based on other published data on the topic; as with any form of meta-analysis, heterogeneity exists across studies, centers, and regions of the world.

The results of this study, and its combination with other existing knowledge on this topic, are applicable to clinical situations that emerge routinely. Since the adjusted increased odds of symptomatic hemorrhage in patients receiving antiplatelets is consistently small, it is likely, at least with respect to aspirin use, that any increased risk from stroke thrombolysis in patients receiving aspirin is of questionable importance. Other clinical variables, most notably stroke severity and age, appear to be much more important.

Conclusions

  1. Top of page
  2. AbstractResumen
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

We found no significant increases in either radiographic or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following thrombolysis in patients receiving antiplatelet agents in the Increasing Stroke Treatment through Interventional Behavior Change Tactics and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Four Emergency Departments studies. The meta-analyses increased the precision of estimates for the unadjusted proportion and adjusted odds of intracranial hemorrhage, and showed that antiplatelet agents may minimally increase symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Future work should focus on the association of antiplatelet use prior to thrombolysis on functional outcomes, the development of selection strategies to triage high-risk patients to treatments, and the discovery of agents that can inhibit the development of postthrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. AbstractResumen
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information
  • 1
    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:15817.
  • 2
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:131729.
  • 3
    Brown DL, Barsan WG, Lisabeth LD, Gallery ME, Morgenstern LB. Survey of emergency physicians about recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 46:5660.
  • 4
    Lou M, Safdar A, Mehdiratta M, et al. The HAT score. Neurology. 2008; 71:141723.
  • 5
    Cucchiara B, Kasner S, Tanne D, et al. Validation assessment of risk scores to predict postthrombolysis intracerebral haemorrhage. Int J Stroke. 2011; 6:10911.
  • 6
    Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:220541.
  • 7
    Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial–Italy. Randomised controlled trial of streptokinase, aspirin, and combination of both in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1995; 346:150914.
  • 8
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Lancet. 1998; 352:124551.
  • 9
    Bravo Y, Martí-Fàbregas J, Cocho D, et al. Influence of antiplatelet pre-treatment on the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008; 26:12633.
  • 10
    Tanne D, Kasner SE, Demchuk AM, et al. Markers of increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy for acute ischemic stroke in clinical practice. Circulation. 2002; 105:167985.
  • 11
    Cucchiara B, Kasner SE, Tanne D, et al. Factors associated with intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009; 40:306772.
  • 12
    Diedler J, Ahmed N, Sykora M, et al. Safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy at stroke onset. Stroke. 2010; 41:28894.
  • 13
    Dorado L, Millán M, De La Ossa NP, et al. Influence of antiplatelet pre-treatment on the risk of intracranial haemorrhage in acute ischaemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis. Eur J Neurol. 2010; 17:3016.
  • 14
    Uyttenboogaart M, Koch MW, Koopman K, Vroomen PC, De Keyser J, Luijckx GJ. Safety of antiplatelet therapy prior to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2008; 65:60711.
  • 15
    Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, et al. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-MOnitoring STudy (SITS-MOST). Stroke. 2008; 39:331622.
  • 16
    Hermann A, Dzialowski I, Koch R, Gahn G. Combined anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel: risk factor for thrombolysis-related intracerebral hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke? J Neurol Sci. 2009; 284:1557.
  • 17
    Scott PA, Meurer WJ, Frederiksen SM, et al. A multilevel intervention to increase community hospital use of alteplase for acute stroke (INSTINCT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012; S1474-4422(12):7031170313.
  • 18
    Scott PA, Frederiksen SM, Kalbfleisch JD, et al. Safety of intravenous thrombolytic use in four emergency departments without acute stroke teams. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17:106271.
  • 19
    Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke. 2000; 31:85862.
  • 20
    D'Agostino RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998; 17:226581.
  • 21
    Kidwell CS, Chalela JA, Saver JL, et al. Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA. 2004; 292:182330.
  • 22
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62:e134.
  • 23
    Schwarzer G. Meta: Meta-Analysis with R. R package version 2.0-0. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/meta/index.html. Accessed Dec 2, 2012.
  • 24
    Lansberg MG, Albers GW, Wijman CA. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a review of the risk factors. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 24:110.
  • 25
    Ovbiagele B, Saver JL. The smoking–thrombolysis paradox and acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005; 65:2935.
  • 26
    Zidovetzki R, Chen P, Fisher M, Hofman FM, Faraci FM. Nicotine increases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 production by human brain endothelial cells via protein kinase C–associated pathway [editorial comment]. Stroke. 1999; 30:6515.
  • 27
    Bradford ST, Stamatovic SM, Dondeti RS, Keep RF, Andjelkovic AV. Nicotine aggravates the brain postischemic inflammatory response. Am J Physiol. 2011; 300:H151829.
  • 28
    Berger C, Fiorelli M, Steiner T, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic brain tissue: asymptomatic or symptomatic? Stroke. 2001; 32:13305.
  • 29
    Engelter ST, Soinne L, Ringleb P, et al. IV thrombolysis and statins. Neurology. 2011; 77:88895.
  • 30
    Kharofa J, Sekar P, Haverbusch M, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke. 2007; 38:304951.
  • 31
    Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet. 2007; 369:2938.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. AbstractResumen
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information
FilenameFormatSizeDescription
acem12077-sup-0001-DataSupplementS1.docxWord document22KData Supplement S1. Intracranial hemorrhage over time.
acem12077-sup-0002-DataSupplementS2.docxWord document34KData Supplement S2. PRISMA flow diagram.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.