• 1
    Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006; 113:e463.
  • 2
    Bengtsson H, Sonesson B, Bergqvist D. Incidence and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms, estimated by necropsy studies and population screening by ultrasound. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996; 800:124.
  • 3
    Jamrozik K, Norman PE, Spencer CA, et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: lessons from a population-based study. Med J Aust. 2000; 173:34550.
  • 4
    Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, et al. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:142530.
  • 5
    Singh K, Bonaa KH, Jacobsen BK, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study: the Tromso Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154:23644.
  • 6
    Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW, van der Does E, et al. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in older adults. The Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142:12919.
  • 7
    Vazquez C, Sakalihasan N, D'Harcour JB, et al. Routine ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65- and 75-year-old men in a city of 200,000 inhabitants. Ann Vasc Surg. 1998; 12:5449.
  • 8
    Boll AP, Verbeek AL, van de Lisdonk EH, et al. High prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a primary care screening programme. Br J Surg. 1998; 85:10904.
  • 9
    Wilmink AB, Quick CR. Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 1998; 85:15562.
  • 10
    Takei H, Ishikawa S, Otaki A, et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and occlusive peripheral vascular disease in Japanese residents. Surg Today. 1995; 25:60811.
  • 11
    Adachi K, Iwasawa T, Ono T. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms during a basic medical checkup in residents of a Japanese rural community. Surg Today. 2000; 30:5949.
  • 12
    Fleming C, Whitlock EP, Bell TL, Lederle FA. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. AHRQ Pub. No. 05-0569-B. 2005.
  • 13
    Borrero E, Queral LA. Symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm misdiagnosed as nephroureterolithiasis. Ann Vasc Surg. 1988; 2:1459.
  • 14
    Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Juul S, Henneberg EW, Fasting H. The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999; 17:4725.
  • 15
    Akkersdijk GJ, van Bockel JH. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: initial misdiagnosis and the effect on treatment. Eur J Surg. 1998; 164:2934.
  • 16
    Marston WA, Ahlquist R, Johnson G Jr, Meyer AA. Misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1992; 16:1722.
  • 17
    Ernst CB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:116772.
  • 18
    Hoffman M, Avellone JC, Plecha FR, et al. Operation for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a community-wide experience. Surgery. 1982; 91:597602.
  • 19
    Plummer D, Clinton J, Matthew B. Emergency department ultrasound improves time to diagnosis and survival in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5:417.
  • 20
    Counselman FL, Sanders A, Slovis CM, Danzl D, Binder LS, Perina DG. The status of bedside ultrasonography training in emergency medicine residency programs. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:3742.
  • 21
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283:200812.
  • 22
    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003; 3:25.
  • 23
    Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:9.
  • 24
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7:17788.
  • 25
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327:55760.
  • 26
    Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:31.
  • 27
    Cosford PA, Leng GC. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 2:CD002945.
  • 28
    Vardulaki KA, Prevost TC, Walker NM, et al. Incidence among men of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: estimates from 500 screen detected cases. J Med Screen. 1999; 6:504.
  • 29
    Salen P, Melanson S, Buro D. ED screening to identify abdominal aortic aneurysms in asymptomatic geriatric patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2003; 21:1335.
  • 30
    Moore CL, Holliday RS, Hwang JQ, Osborne MR. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic at-risk patients using emergency ultrasound. Am J Emerg Med. 2008; 26:8837.
  • 31
    Hoffmann B, Um P, Bessman ES, Ding R, Kelen GD, McCarthy ML. Routine screening for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients is not recommended in emergency departments that are frequently crowded. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16:124250.
  • 32
    Hoffmann B, Bessman ES, Um P, Ding R, McCarthy ML. Successful sonographic visualisation of the abdominal aorta differs significantly among a diverse group of credentialed emergency department providers. Emerg Med J. 2011; 28:4726.
  • 33
    Chu NH. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 7-year retrospective observational study in an emergency department of Hong Kong. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2010; 17:11825.
  • 34
    Blaivas M, Theodoro D. Frequency of incomplete abdominal aorta visualization by emergency department bedside ultrasound. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11:1035.
  • 35
    Walker A, Brenchley J, Sloan JP, Lalanda M, Venables H. Ultrasound by emergency physicians to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms: a UK case series. Emerg Med J. 2004; 21:2579.
  • 36
    Schlager D, Lazzareschi G, Whitten D, Sanders AB. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the ED by emergency physicians. Am J Emerg Med. 1994; 12:1859.
  • 37
    Dent B, Kendall RJ, Boyle AA, Atkinson PR. Emergency ultrasound of the abdominal aorta by UK emergency physicians: a prospective cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2007; 24:5479.
  • 38
    Lanoix R, Baker WE, Mele JM, Dharmarajan L. Evaluation of an instructional model for emergency ultrasonography. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5:5863.
  • 39
    Lanoix R, Leak LV, Gaeta T, Gernsheimer JR. A preliminary evaluation of emergency ultrasound in the setting of an emergency medicine training program. Am J Emerg Med. 2000; 18:415.
  • 40
    Kuhn M, Bonnin RL, Davey MJ, Rowland JL, Langlois SL. Emergency department ultrasound scanning for abdominal aortic aneurysm: accessible, accurate, and advantageous. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 36:21923.
  • 41
    Rowland JL, Kuhn M, Bonnin RL, Davey MJ, Langlois SL. Accuracy of emergency department bedside ultrasonography. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2001; 13:30513.
  • 42
    Jones PG, Peak S, McClelland A, Holden A, Higginson I, Gamble G. Emergency ultrasound credentialing for focused assessment sonography in trauma and abdominal aortic aneurysm: a practical approach for Australasia. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003; 15:5462.
  • 43
    Tayal VS, Graf CD, Gibbs MA. Prospective study of accuracy and outcome of emergency ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm over two years. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:86771.
  • 44
    Knaut AL, Kendall JL, Patten R, Ray C. Ultrasonographic measurement of aortic diameter by emergency physicians approximates results obtained by computed tomography. J Emerg Med. 2005; 28:11926.
  • 45
    Costantino TG, Bruno EC, Handly N, Dean AJ. Accuracy of emergency medicine ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Emerg Med. 2005; 29:45560.
  • 46
    Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978; 299:92630.
  • 47
    Loy CT, Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004; 292:16029.
  • 48
    Worster A, Carpenter C. Incorporation bias in studies of diagnostic tests: how to avoid being biased about bias. Can J Emerg Med. 2008; 10:1745.
  • 49
    Begg CB, McNeil BJ. Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology. 1988; 167:5659.
  • 50
    Kelly S, Berry E, Roderick P, et al. The identification of bias in studies of the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70:102835.
  • 51
    American College of Emergency Physicians. Policy Statement Emergency Ultrasound Guidelines. 2008. Available at: Accessed Nov 9, 2012.
  • 52
    Quinn MF. Relation of observer agreement to accuracy according to a two-receiver signal detection model of diagnosis. Med Decis Making. 1989; 9:196206.
  • 53
    Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. JAMA. 1995; 274:64551.
  • 54
    Begg CB, Greenes RA, Iglewicz B. The influence of uninterpretability on the assessment of diagnostic tests. J Chronic Dis. 1986; 39:57584.
  • 55
    Egglin TK, Feinstein AR. Context bias. A problem in diagnostic radiology. JAMA. 1996; 276:17525.
  • 56
    Singh K, Bonaa KH, Solberg S, Sorlie DG, Bjork L. Intra- and interobserver variability in ultrasound measurements of abdominal aortic diameter. The Tromso Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998; 15:497504.
  • 57
    Lederle FA. In the clinic. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150:ITC51.
  • 58
    Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138:4044.
  • 59
    Fink HA, Lederle FA, Roth CS, Bowles CA, Nelson DB, Haas MA. The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:8336.
  • 60
    Elkouri S, Panneton JM, Andrews JC, et al. Computed tomography and ultrasound in follow-up of patients after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004; 18:2719.