Global Emergency Medicine: A Review of the Literature From 2012


  • Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) Group members are listed in Appendix A.

  • Presented at the Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, Atlanta, GA, May 14, 2013.

  • The authors have no relevant financial information or potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Address for correspondence and reprints: Gabrielle A. Jacquet, MD, MPH; e-mail:



The Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) conducts an annual search of peer-reviewed and grey literature relevant to global emergency medicine (EM) to identify, review, and disseminate the most important new research in this field to a worldwide audience of academics and clinical practitioners.


This year, our search identified 4,818 articles written in six languages. These articles were distributed among 20 reviewers for initial screening based on their relevance to the field of global EM. Two additional reviewers searched and screened the grey literature. A total of 224 articles were deemed appropriate by at least one reviewer and were approved by their editor for formal scoring of overall quality and importance.


Of the 224 articles that met our predetermined inclusion criteria, 56% were categorized as Emergency Care in Resource-limited Settings, 18% as EM development, and 26% as Disaster and Humanitarian Response. A total of 28 articles received scores of 16 or higher and were selected for formal summary and critique. Inter-rater reliability for two reviewers using our scoring system was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.625 (95% confidence interval = 0.512 to 0.711).


In 2012 there were more disaster and humanitarian response articles than in previous years. As in prior years, the majority of articles addressed the acute management of infectious diseases or the care of vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women.


Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias Global: Una Revisión de la Literatura de 2012


La revisión de la literatura publicada en Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (MUE) global comporta una búsqueda anual de los trabajos relevantes para la MUE global, tanto publicados tras revisión por pares como corresponedientes a literatura gris. La finalidad es identificar, revisar y diseminar las investigaciones novedosas más importantes en este campoa médicos clínicos y universitarios de todo el mundo.


Este año, nuestra búsqueda identificó 4.818 artículos escritos en seis lenguas. Estos artículos se distribuyeron entre 20 revisores para el despistaje inicial basándose en su relevancia para el campo de la MUE global. Dos revisores adicionales buscaron y filtraron la literatura gris. Un total de 224 artículos se consideraron apropiados por al menos un revisor, y se aprobaron por su editor para la puntuación formal de la calidad e importancia totales.


De los 224 artículos que cumplieron nuestros criterios de inclusión predeterminados, un 56% se clasificaron como atención de urgencias y emergencias en ámbitos de recursos limitados, un 18% como desarrollo de la MUE y un 26% como catástrofes y respuesta humanitaria. Un total de 28 artículos recibieron una puntuación de 16 o más y se seleccionaron para el resumen y la crítica formal. La fiabilidad interobservador para los 2 revisores usando nuestro sistema de puntuación fue buena, con un coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,625 (IC 95% = 0,512 a 0,711).


En 2012 hubo más artículos sobre catástrofes y respuesta humanitaria que en años anteriores. Como en los años previos, la mayoría de los artículos valoraron el manejo agudo de enfermedades infecciosas o la atención de poblaciones vulnerables como los niños y las mujeres embarazadas.

In 2012, deadly earthquakes affected Iran, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, while Sri Lanka and southern India saw their deadliest tropical cyclone in years: Nilam. The most destructive storm of 2012, Hurricane Sandy, left a wake of destruction stretching from Jamaica to Quebec. Meanwhile, the ongoing conflict in Syria left thousands dead and contributed more than three million additional internally displaced people to the global total.[1] At the same time, interest in formal education and training in emergency medicine (EM) continued to grow in breadth and intensity. In January, Dubai hosted the first Global Network Conference on Emergency Medicine.[2] In October, Ghana and the African Federation of Emergency Medicine hosted the first African Conference on Emergency Medicine.[3] As interest in the field of EM expands, the Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) strives to ensure that emergency practitioners, from those in academic emergency departments (EDs) to those on the front lines of disaster care, have access to the most current and important research conducted on relevant topics around the world.

The GEMLR began 8 years ago in an attempt to identify and consolidate the best global EM literature into a format that was easy for both academics and practitioners to access and comprehend. This year, our panel of seasoned reviewers includes physicians from Australia, China, Ghana, Lebanon, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The primary goals of the review are to illustrate best practices, stimulate research, and promote further professionalization in the field of global EM through the identification of important new publications that focus on emergency care in low-resource settings. At the same time, the review is not a formal systematic review, which aims to synthesize the published literature on a specific topic or research question. Each year, the number of quality articles in the field grows significantly, and thus the mission of the review becomes more challenging. The scope of global EM continues to stretch beyond its initial boundaries to include injury prevention, epidemiologic transition, and device implementation. For the 2012 review, we continue to include literature that falls into one of the three following categories: disaster and humanitarian response, emergency care in resource-limited settings, and EM development.

This is the third year that grey literature was included in our search strategy. Grey literature has been defined as any material produced by an organization whose primary function is not publication.[4] Our goal in performing a grey literature search was to identify new global EM research conducted by government agencies, local or international nongovernment organizations, or other entities that may not have been published in peer-reviewed journals.


Each year, the GEMLR editorial board revises a procedure manual that outlines in detail the methodology for its search, screening, scoring, and reviewing processes.[5] Because the GEMLR is a review article, no prior ethical or institutional review board approval was sought for this manuscript. There were nine editors, four advisors, one Academic Emergency Medicine representative, and 20 reviewers. As reviewers and editors could not be blinded to the authors of the articles included in the review or their affiliations, both reviewers and editors were recused from scoring or reviewing any articles in which they may have been directly or indirectly involved.

The initial search was conducted in two blocks: the first from January 1 to August 31, 2012, and the second from September 1 to December 31, 2012. We used PubMed to search Medline for original research or review articles that contained at least one “global” search term and one “emergency medicine” search term (Table 1). A hand search of journals that published significant numbers of articles that were included in our prior reviews was also performed. This year, the following journals were included in the hand search: Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Academic Emergency Medicine, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Journal, and The Lancet.

Table 1. Search Terms
Emergency MedicineGlobal
Emergency medicineWorld health
RefugeesDeveloping countries
Emergency treatmentInternational
Relief workGlobal
Rescue workTropical medicine
Acute diseaseThird world
HumanitarianMiddle-income countries
Critical illnessLow-income countries
WarResource-limited settings
Multiple trauma 
Internally displaced persons 
Emergency medical services 
Critical care 

Based on the linguistic capacity of our reviewers and editors, our search this year was limited to articles published in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Chinese. All studies were limited to human subjects only; news articles and letters were excluded. Articles that had been e-published ahead of print in 2011 and had thus been included in the 2011 review were also excluded.

The total number of articles produced by our PubMed search for 2012 was 2,098: 2,001 English, 31 French, 17 German, 15 Spanish, three Chinese, and three Italian. The total number of articles produced by our hand search for 2012 was 2,748. The 4,818 articles produced by these two searches were divided among the 20 reviewers for initial screening based on their relevance to the field of global EM (as defined by the criteria listed above). A total of 209 articles were each deemed appropriate for formal scoring of their overall quality and importance by at least one reviewer and approved by his or her editor.

For the grey literature search, we used a preidentified list of academic, government, and nongovernment organizations known to be conducting global health research or investigations as part of their work (Table 2). Two reviewers were assigned to systematically search the websites of these organizations for needs assessments, program monitoring, evaluation reports, topic reviews, white papers, conference proceedings, and other types of articles that met the predefined screening criteria for relevance to the field of global EM. Through our grey literature search process, we found 15 additional global EM research articles that met the inclusion criteria. These were combined with those identified by the Medline search to create a database of 224 research articles for formal scoring.

Table 2. Grey Literature Sources
  1. UN = United Nations.

Academic centers⁄think tanks
  1. Global Health Council
  2. Center for Global Development
  3. The United Nations University
  4. RAND Corporation
  5. The Woodrow Wilson Center
  6. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  7. Center for Global Health Research⁄University of Toronto
  8. Emergency Trauma Care Project
NGOs, UN, and government agency websites
  1. MEASURE Evaluation
  2. MSF
  3. Epicentre
  4. International Rescue Committee
  5. International Medical Corps
  6. Oxfam International
  7. Oxfam Great Britain
  8. GIZ⁄GTZ
  9. International Committee of the Red Cross
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  11. World Health Organization
  12. Humanitarian Practice Network
  13. UN High Commission for Refugees
  14. UN Development Program
 15. Inter-Agency Standing Committee
  16. UNICEF

Once selected for scoring, the full-text article was obtained and classified as either an original research or review article. Each article was also categorized as emergency care in resource-limited settings, EM development, or disaster and humanitarian response. Emergency care in resource limited settings includes trauma care, acute medical care, triage, and prehospital care in low- and middle-income countries or resource-limited settings of high-income countries. EM development includes research on the development of EM as a specialty, EM educational programs, or emergency medical care systems outside of North America, regardless of the national income level. Disaster and humanitarian response includes research on the care of civilian populations in conflict; disaster mitigation, assessment, and response; and health care of refugees and internally displaced persons.

Each article was then scored by two separate reviewers using a predefined grading scale that assessed for clarity, design, ethics, importance, and impact. Final scoring ranged from 0 to 20 (Table 3), with the mean of the two scores used as the final score for the article. Any article with a score difference between reviewers of greater than two standard deviations above the median score difference was rescored by an editor. The new score was then used as the final score for the article. Twenty-eight articles had final scores of 16 or greater and were selected for formal review. These articles were then distributed to reviewers who produced summaries and critiques of each article.

Table 3. Scoring Criteria
 Original ArticlesPointsReview ArticlesPoints
  1. COI = conflict of interest; GEM = global emergency medicine; IRB = institutional review board; NGO = nongovernmental organization; RCT = randomized controlled trial; UN = United Nations.

Clarity  Clearly stated purpose for review2
Sufficient background provided1
Understandable to nonprofessional1
Clear language, appropriate use of tables and figures1
DesignRCT or observational study with control group2Formal meta-analysis or systemic review (including studies with a control group)2
No bias in selection of subjects; attempts to limit bias1Study selection is clear and reproducible1
Adequate blinding of study subjects1Article selected by at least two blinded authors1
Correct statistical tests used for analysis1Data aggregated and⁄or analyzed appropriately1
EthicsApproved by IRB2  
Adheres to Declaration of Helsinki1
Consent obtained or waived by IRB1
Authors have no COI1
ImportanceResults are generalizable to a variety of settings2Results are generalizable to a variety of settings2
Topic is important2Topic is important2
Topic is clearly relevant to GEM1Topic is relevant to the realm of GEM1
ImpactRecommendations can be implemented in developing countries2Recommendations are applicable across a wide range of different settings2
The proposed intervention is cost-effective1Intervention studied is cost-effective1
NGOs, UN agencies, and other actors would likely change their practice if they were aware of this study1NGOs, UN agencies, and other actors would likely change their practice if they were aware of this study1
Study results likely to stimulate further research1Study results likely to stimulate further research1


Of the 224 articles that met our predetermined inclusion criteria, 56% were categorized as emergency care in resource-limited settings, 18% as EM development, and 26% as disaster and humanitarian response. Approximately 64% of the articles were original research, while the remaining 36% were review articles.

The median final score for all articles was 12.5, ranging from 4.5 to 19. The difference in mean scores between Medline (12.6) and grey literature (11.5) articles was not significant (p = 0.069), nor was the difference in mean scores between original research (12.5) and review (12.4) articles (p = 0.700) or the differences in mean scores between emergency care in resource-limited settings (12.4), EM development (13.2), and disaster and humanitarian response (12.1) articles (p = 0.199). Inter-rater reliability for reviewer scoring, measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient, was 0.625 (95% confidence interval = 0.512 to 0.711), considered “good” reliability in the literature.

The top 28 global EM articles for 2012 are listed in Table 4.[6-34] The complete database of all 224 global EM articles for 2012, as well as full summaries and critical analyses of the top 28 global EM of articles of 2012, can be found in Data Supplements S1 and S2 (available as supporting information in the online version of this article).

Table 4. GEMLR 2012 Articles
CategoryFirst AuthorTitleJournal
  1. GEMLR = Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review.

Emergency care in resource-limited settingsTougherEffect of the Affordable Medicines Facility–malaria (AMFm) on the availability, price, and market share of quality-assured artemisinin-based combination therapies in seven countries: a before-and-after analysis of outlet survey data Lancet
KausarNurses in low resource settings save mothers' lives with non-pneumatic anti-shock garment Am J Mater Child Nurs
DasShort-term therapeutic role of zinc in children < 5 years of age hospitalized for severe acute lower respiratory tract infection Paediatr Respir Rev
LazzeriniOral zinc for treating diarrhoea in children Cochrane Database Syst Rev
HouseEstimating the weight of children in Kenya: do the Broselow tape and age-based formulas measure up? Ann Emerg Med
RiazEfficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in acute childhood diarrhea: a double blind randomized controlled trial Indian J Pediatr
DeenCommunity-acquired bacterial bloodstream infections in developing countries in south and southeast Asia: a systematic review Lancet Infect Dis
CilliersAnti-inflammatory treatment for carditis in acute rheumatic fever Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Eizadi-MoodAdmission creatine phosphokinase in acute poisoning: is it a predictive factor for the treatment outcome? J Pakistan Med Assoc
SinghiPotential risk of hypoxaemia in patients with severe pneumonia but no hypoxia on initial assessment: a prospective pilot trail Paediatr Int Child Health
VinnemeierPredictive value of fever and palmar pallor for P. falciparum Parasitaemia in children from an endemic area PLoS One
Coulborn Feasibility of using teleradiology to improve tuberculosis screening and case management in a district hospital in Malawi Bull World Health Org
OgwangCommunity involvement in obstetric emergency management in rural areas: a case of Rukungiri district, western Uganda BMC Preg Childbirth
SewardAssociation between clean delivery kit use, clean delivery practices, and neonatal survival: pooled analysis of data from three sites in south Asia PLoS Med
LiuThe gap in injury mortality rates between urban and rural residents of Hubei province, China BMC Public Health
GroenUntreated surgical conditions in Sierra Leone Lancet
AmehThe impact of emergency obstetric care training in Somaliland, Somalia Int J Gynaecol Obstet
PageEvaluation of rapid test for the diagnosis of cholera in the absence of a gold standard PLos One
EM developmentHenryPrehospital trauma systems reduce mortality in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Trauma Acute Care Surg
SunThe emergency first aid responder system model: using community members Emerg Med J
WachiraAn analysis of clinical practice in a public emergency departments in Kenya Emerg Med J
JohnsonClinical skills and knowledge requirements of health care providers caring for children in disaster, humanitarian and civic assistance operations: an integrative review of the literature Prehosp Disaster Med
MahabirAttitudes of ED staff to the presences of family during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a Trinidad and Tobago perspective Emerg Med J
MosleyWhat is the impact of structured resuscitation training on healthcare practitioners, their clients, and the wider service? Med Teach
Disaster and humanitarian responseMahamudEpidemic cholera in Kakuma Refugee Camp, Kenya, 2009: the importance of sanitation and soap J Infect Dev Ctries
KirschSatisfaction with the humanitarian response to the 2010 Pakistan floods: a call for increased accountability to beneficiaries Emerg Med J
DevnaniFactors associated with the willingness of health care personnel to work during an influenza public health emergency: an integrative review Prehosp Disaster Med
ZhangHyponatraemia in patients with crush syndrome during the Wenchuan earthquake Emerg Med J


The most notable difference in the 2012 review, in comparison to previous reviews, was the inclusion of an article from the grey literature. This represented the first time a grey literature article scored above the predefined cutoff for full review. In addition, there were many more disaster and humanitarian response articles than had been selected for final review in previous years. While historically there have been more review articles, this year the majority of the chosen articles were original research articles. Below we summarize some of the 2012 trends in global EM research.

Emergency Care in Resource-limited Settings

As in years past, this category of articles remains the most represented among articles chosen for full review (66%). Highlighting the continued global focus placed on child and maternal mortality, most of the articles were centered on pediatric infectious disease or obstetric care.

Diarrheal illnesses continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide; several of the 2012 articles focused on the diagnosis and management of diarrhea. Lazzerini and Ronfani[6] performed a systematic review on zinc supplementation in children with acute diarrhea. The authors found that in children less than 6 months of age, there is evidence that zinc supplementation is not beneficial and may even be harmful. In children older than 6 months, however, zinc supplementation may shorten the course of diarrhea by 10 hours and reduce the number of children who have continued diarrhea at 7 days. In the subpopulation of children greater than 6 months of age with moderate malnutrition, there is high-quality evidence that zinc supplementation may reduce the length of the episode by slightly more than a day. Furthermore, in their randomized, double-blinded controlled trial, Riaz et al.[7] found that administration of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii shortened the course of diarrhea by 12 hours. Page et al.[8] evaluated crystal VC immunochromatography as a rapid diagnostic test for cholera in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In comparison to a modified reference standard, the rapid diagnostic test was reported to have high sensitivity and specificity, making it a potentially useful adjunct in identifying cholera outbreaks.

Pneumonia is also an important cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality, particularly in children. Two of the 2012 articles examined pneumonia. Das et al.[9] performed a meta-analysis of the evidence for administering zinc in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in children less than 5 years of age, finding that zinc does not improve outcomes in these patients. Singhi et al.[10] examined the incidence of developing hypoxemia in pediatric patients with severe pneumonia. The authors found that over half of initially normoxemic patients in the study cohort became hypoxemic during their hospital stays, suggesting the need for close monitoring of children under 5 years of age admitted with severe pneumonia.

A number of additional articles included in this year's review focused on communicable diseases. Coulborn et al.[11] found that the use of teleradiology in Malawi had a significant effect on the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. Vinnemeier et al.[12] attempted to create an age-dependent clinical decision algorithm for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children in endemic areas. Although such a rule would suffer from poor sensitivity, their study does highlight the importance of using palmar pallor as an indicator of anemia secondary to malaria in their study population. Tougher et al.[13] also focused their research on malaria and found that a subsidy program had a significant impact on the price, availability, and market share of for antimalarial combination therapies in seven countries. Cilliers et al.[14] performed a systematic literature review on the use of anti-inflammatory medications for acute rheumatic fever, finding no evidence to support the use of corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulins to prevent or reduce cardiac disease. A systematic literature review of community-acquired bacteremia in admitted febrile patients in South and Southeast Asia identified Salmonella typhi as the most common cause of community acquired bacteremia.[15] Furthermore, they reported that nearly half of S. typhi strains were resistant to first-line drugs.

Maternal mortality continues to be a heavy burden of disease around the world, and several of the 2012 articles focused on the acute management of obstetric emergencies. First, Kausar et al.[16] found that a nonpneumatic antishock garment could be used effectively by nurse midwives to reduce hemorrhage, decrease emergency cesarean rates, and lower maternal mortality in patients with hypovolemic shock from uterine atony. This device is similar to military antishock trousers and could be a useful first aid measure. Second Ameh et al.[17] evaluated the effect of a 3- to 4-day “emergency obstetric and newborn care” training course on the skills and knowledge of maternity and newborn health care providers in Somaliland. Third, in their descriptive study from rural Uganda, Ogwang et al.[18] demonstrated that use of community practices and support services for obstetric emergencies is influenced by employment status and quality of maternal health care. And finally, Seward et al.[19] examined the association between clean delivery kit use or clean delivery practices and neonatal mortality among home births in Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, showing that clean kits and practices can lower mortality in a child's first 28 days of life.

Injury now exceeds communicable illnesses as a leading cause of death in many countries.[20] Liu et al.[21] demonstrated clear urban–rural disparities in the age and sex demographics of injured patients, as well as in the types of injuries and injury mortality rates in China, with higher mortality in the rural areas. Groen et al.[22] used a population-based household survey to assess surgical needs and to identify surgically preventable deaths in resource-limited countries. The authors found a high prevalence of untreated surgical conditions and attributed nearly a quarter of all deaths in their sample to poor access to surgical care.

Poisoning is also an important cause of injury in many developing countries, and Eizadi-Mood et al.[23] performed a prospective observational study on patients with acute poisoning in Iran, demonstrating that admission creatine phosphokinase was a predictor of poor outcomes in poisoned patients. Creatine phosphokinase may be an important prognostic laboratory indicator in this population.

Care for the pediatric population was again highlighted in an article by House et al.[24] The authors compared the commonly used with age-based formulas for estimating weight of children in Kenya and found that that the Broselow tape was the better predictor of pediatric weight.

EM Development

This year, 21% of the articles selected for full review were from the EM development category. Two of these articles highlight the importance of prehospital care. Henry and Reingold[25] performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data on the effectiveness of prehospital trauma systems in emerging and developing countries. They found that prehospital trauma care interventions are associated with a 25% decrease in mortality in these settings. Sun and Wallis[26] published a narrative analysis and postintervention survey describing the establishment of a first responder system in a violent, resource-poor urban district in South Africa. The authors concluded that utilizing locally supported and trained community-based first responders is a cost-effective method for delivering appropriate lifesaving interventions in emergent out-of-hospital situations.

Resuscitation was the subject of two of the EM development articles. An observational survey found that there was a strong belief by ED physicians and nurses in Trinidad and Tobago public hospitals that family members should not be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.[27] Mosley et al.[28] performed a literature review on the effect of structured resuscitation training programs on knowledge and skill acquisition as well as clinical outcomes. The authors demonstrated that structured resuscitation training consistently improved the knowledge and skills of participants and that knowledge and skills begin to deteriorate starting at 3 months after the training. In settings where structured resuscitation training programs were institutional and no prior training existed, a clear improvement in clinical management and mortality was identified.[28]

Wachira et al.[29] published the first descriptive study of the profile and disposition of patients presenting to large public EDs in Kenya. Their analysis demonstrates a need for gathering basic data on presenting complaints and diagnoses of patients cared for in Kenyan EDs. In addition, they found that most ED care was limited to noncritical cases, and sicker patients admitted to the hospital often had to wait for transfer to inpatient units before receiving important interventions.

An article by Johnson et al.[30] spans the categories of EM development and disaster and humanitarian response, focusing on the development of training programs for military personnel providing pediatric care during disasters and humanitarian and civil assistance operations. Based on their review of the literature, the authors concluded that such a curriculum should incorporate specific education on infectious diseases, vaccinations, malnutrition, sanitation, and care of injuries.

Disaster and Humanitarian Response

Whereas last year this category did not have any articles selected for final review, this year 14% of the chosen articles were from the disaster and humanitarian response category. Two articles focused on natural disasters, while the other two highlighted findings from infectious disease epidemics.

Kirsch et al.[31] performed a multistage randomized cluster sample survey to evaluate recipient satisfaction of humanitarian aid in the first 6 months following the 2010 Pakistan floods. The authors found that fewer than 20% of respondents were satisfied with the response. Zhang et al.[32] performed a retrospective study in 17 reference hospitals after the Wenchuan earthquake and described the prevalence of hyponatremia as well as its effect on outcomes among earthquake victims. They found that hyponatremia was associated with high morbidity and mortality for earthquake victims with crush syndrome.

Within the past decade there have been three major influenza-like public health emergencies: severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian influenza, and the H1N1 pandemic influenza. Devnani[33] published an integrative review of factors influencing the willingness of health care providers to work during public health emergencies such as these with important implications for disaster and pandemic planning at the hospital, regional, and national level.

Cholera still remains a significant public health concern among displaced populations such as in refugee camps. Mahamud et al.[34] conducted a case–control study at Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya and found that the provision of soap, education on hand hygiene, and cleaning water storage containers may be cost-effective interventions to prevent cholera. This article is a validation of prior work, confirming that hand washing and use of soap are effective means of combating cholera epidemics.


Global emergency medicine is a field that is rapidly growing in both depth and breadth. As the specialty expands, the body of literature it produces continues to increase and diversify. The articles chosen represent examples of both high-quality and high-impact EM research currently being conducted across the globe. While not an exhaustive list of all global EM articles, this review highlights a sampling of the most current and relevant literature in the field. We hope these articles will promote evidence-based practice, encourage global discourse, and further research in global EM.


Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) Group (alphabetical)

Peter Aitken, MBBS, EMDM, MClinEdD, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Townsville Hospital and Anton Breinl Centre for Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia

Kris Arnold, MD, MPH, ArLac Health Services, Boston, MA

Miriam Aschkenasy, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Hospital, Cambridge, MA, and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA

Susan Bartels, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA

Torben Kim Becker, MD, DrMed, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Mark Bisanzo, MD, DTM&H, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA

Aislinn Black, DO, Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY

Jennifer Chan, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL

Hannah Cockrell, BA, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI

Herbert C. Duber, MD, MPH, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Mark Foran, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA

Elizabeth Goldberg, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI

Bhakti Hansoti, MBChB, Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Braden Hexom, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Rachel Anne Inbanathan, MD, Liverpool Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Gabrielle A. Jacquet, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, and Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Joshua Jauregui, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI

Okechukwu Ogbonna Jibuike, MBBS, FRCS, PG Dip Healthcare, MCEM, MACEM, MSEM, MFMLM, Trafford General Hospital Manchester, Division of Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

Stephanie Kayden, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA

Adam C. Levine, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI

Xiaoguang Li, MD, Shanghai United Family Hospital, Shanghai, China

Kevin Lunney, MD, PhD, Department of Emergency Medicine, UCSF Fresno, Fresno, CA

Regan H. Marsh, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA

Dan Millikan, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence Regional Medical Center, Everett, WA

Payal Modi, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI

Stephen Morris, MD, MPH, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Theresa Nguyen, MD, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE

Maxwell Osei-Ampofo, MBChB, MBA, MGCS(EM), MPH-c, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital and Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Usha Periyanayagam, MD, MPH, MS, Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL

Kimberly Pringle, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI

Michael Runyon, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC

Erika D. Schroeder, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, and Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence Regional Medical Center, Everett, WA

Nagi Souaiby, MD, MPH, MHM, Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Joseph Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, St. Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon

Ambrose H. Wong, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University, New York, NY

Wah Hon Yau, FHKAM (EM), FHKCEM, MRCS (Ed), MBBS, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong