• 1
    Tanabe P, Kyriacou DN, Garland F. Factors affecting the risk of blood bank specimen hemolysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:897900.
  • 2
    Grant MS. The effect of blood drawing techniques and equipment on the hemolysis of ED laboratory blood samples. J Emerg Nurs. 2003; 29:11621.
  • 3
    Lowe G, Stike R, Pollack M, et al. Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques. J Emerg Nurs. 2008; 34:2632.
  • 4
    Kennedy C, Angermuller S, King R, et al. A comparison of hemolysis rates using intravenous catheters versus venipuncture tubes for obtaining blood samples. J Emerg Nurs. 1996; 22:5669.
  • 5
    Straszewski SM, Sanchez L, McGillicuddy D, et al. Use of separate venipunctures for IV access and laboratory studies decreases hemolysis rates. Intern Emerg Med. 2011; 6:3579.
  • 6
    Dugan L, Leech L, Speroni KG, Corriher J. Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2005; 31:33845.
  • 7
    Burns E, Yoshikawa N. Hemolysis in serum samples drawn by emergency department personnel versus laboratory phlebotomists. Lab Med. 2002; 33:37880.
  • 8
    Agos MD, Lizarraga R, Gambra D, Maranon A, Orozco C, Diaz E. Factors related to haemolysis in the extraction of blood samples [Spanish]. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2008; 31:1538.
  • 9
    Ong ME, Chan YH, Lim CS. Reducing blood sample hemolysis at a tertiary hospital emergency department. Am J Med. 2009; 122:e16.
  • 10
    Dwyer D, Fry M, Somerville A, Holdgate A. Randomized, single blinded control trial comparing haemolysis rate between two cannula aspiration techniques. Emerg Med Australas. 2006; 18:4848.
  • 11
    Stauss M, Sherman B, Pugh L, et al. Hemolysis of coagulation specimens: a comparative study of intravenous draw methods. J Emerg Nurs. 2012; 38:1521.
  • 12
    Cox SR, Dages JH, Jarjoura D, Hazelett S. Blood samples drawn from IV catheters have less hemolysis when 5-mL (vs 10-mL) collection tubes are used. J Emerg Nurs. 2004; 30:52933.
  • 13
    Ellis G. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system. Clin Biochem. 2009; 42:12659.
  • 14
    Fernandes CM, Worster A, Eva K, Hill S, McCallum C. Pneumatic tube delivery system for blood samples reduces turnaround times without affecting sample quality. J Emerg Nurs. 2006; 32:13943.
  • 15
    Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011; 48:14353.
  • 16
    Heyer NJ, Derzon JH, Winges L, et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood sample hemolysis in EDs: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem. 2012; 45:101232.
  • 17
    Raisky F, Gauthier C, Marchal A, Blum D. Haemolyzed samples: responsibility of short catheters. Ann Biol Clin. 1994; 52:5237.