SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Chronic Ethanol Withdrawal;
  • Lipopolysaccharide;
  • Cytokines;
  • HMGB1 Antagonists;
  • CRF1 Receptor Antagonist

Background

Many neurobiological factors may initiate and sustain alcoholism. Recently, dysregulation of the neuroimmune system by chronic ethanol (CE) has implicated Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) activation. Even though TLR4s are linked to CE initiation of brain cytokine mRNAs, the means by which CE influences neuroimmune signaling in brain in the absence of infection remains uncertain. Therefore, the hypothesis is tested that release of an endogenous TLR4 agonist, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and/or corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) during CE withdrawal are responsible for CE protocols increasing cytokine mRNAs.

Methods

Acute ethanol (EtOH; 2.75 g/kg) and acute lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 250 μg/kg) dosing on cytokine mRNAs are first compared. Then, the effects of chronic LPS exposure (250 μg/kg for 10 days) on cytokine mRNAs are compared with changes induced by CE protocols (15 days of continuous 7% EtOH diet [CE protocol] or 3 intermittent 5-day cycles of 7% EtOH diet [CIE protocol]). Additionally, TLR4, HMGB1, and downstream effector mRNAs are assessed after CE, CIE, and chronic LPS. To test whether HMGB1 and/or CRF support the CE withdrawal increase in cytokine mRNAs, the HMGB1 antagonists, glycyrrhizin and ethyl pyruvate, and a CRF1 receptor antagonist (CRF1RA) are administered during 24 hours of CE withdrawal.

Results

While cytokine mRNAs were not increased following acute EtOH, acute LPS increased all cytokine mRNAs 4 hours after injection. CE produced no change in cytokine mRNAs prior to CE removal; however, the CE and CIE protocols increased cytokine mRNAs by 24 hours after withdrawal. In contrast, chronic LPS produced no cytokine mRNA changes 24 hours after LPS dosing. TLR4 mRNA was elevated 24 hours following both CE protocols and chronic LPS exposure. While chronic LPS had no effect on HMGB1 mRNA, withdrawal from CE protocols significantly elevated HMGB1 mRNA. Systemic administration of HMGB1 antagonists or a CRF1RA significantly reduced the cytokine mRNA increase following CE withdrawal. The CRF1RA and the HMGB1 antagonist, ethyl pyruvate, also reduced the HMGB1 mRNA increase that followed CE withdrawal.

Conclusions

By blocking HMGB1 or CRF action during CE withdrawal, evidence is provided that HMGB1 and CRF release are critical for the CE withdrawal induction of selected brain cytokine mRNAs. Consequently, these results clarify a means by which withdrawal from CE exposure activates neuroimmune function in the sterile milieu of brain.