Corrections added to the Results section on 6 February 2013, after first online publication: the percentage improvement in HAM-D scores was changed from 61.1% vs. 34.4% to 59.5% vs. 32.5%; NNT of 3.7 was changed to NNT of 3.9 and NNT of 2.8 was changed to NNT of 3.3.
Original Article
The superiority of antidepressant medication to cognitive behavior therapy in melancholic depressed patients: a 12-week single-blind randomized study
Article first published online: 14 DEC 2012
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12049
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue
1600-0447/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=2490e7fa7d6cf4ca5c46f8af8cc06622127af8f8)
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)
Additional Information
How to Cite
, , , , , , , , , , . The superiority of antidepressant medication to cognitive behavior therapy in melancholic depressed patients: a 12-week single-blind randomized study.
Publication History
- Article first published online: 14 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 22 OCT 2012
Funded by
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Grant Number: 630619
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- melancholia;
- antidepressant drugs;
- cognitive behavior therapy
Objective
To pursue the previously long-standing but formally untested clinical view that melancholia is preferentially responsive to antidepressant medication in comparison with psychotherapy [specifically Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)]. Second, to determine whether a broader action antidepressant medication sequencing regimen is superior to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) alone.
Method
We sought to recruit a large sample of participants with melancholic depression for a 12-week trial but inclusion criteria compromised recruitment and testing the second hypothesis. The first hypothesis was evaluated by comparing 18 participants receiving antidepressant medication to 11 receiving CBT. Primary study measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Hamilton Endogenous Subscale (HES), rated blindly, while several secondary measures also evaluated outcome.
Results
Participants receiving medication had a superior 12-week outcome to those receiving CBT, with significant differences present on primary measures as early as 4 weeks. At trial conclusion, the percentage improvement in HAM-D scores was 59.5% vs. 32.5%, respectively [Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 3.9] and with those in receipt of medication returning non-significantly higher HAM-D responder (66.6% vs. 36.4%, NNT = 3.3) and remission (66.7% vs. 45.4%, NNT = 4.7) rates.†
Conclusion
As the sample size was small and participants evidenced only moderate levels of depression severity, the study risked being underpowered and idiosyncratic. Despite the small sample, the superiority of antidepressant medication to CBT in those with a melancholic depression was distinctive in this pilot study.

1600-0447/asset/acps_left.gif?v=1&s=0e4c72fe7df0553c2a9b39feea9b2e2574c289c2)
1600-0447/asset/acps_centre.gif?v=1&s=4ab34d92d51234b4ebd675388bcc1b75dbfb407a)