Get access

Pathways between neurocognition, social cognition and emotion regulation in bipolar disorder

Authors

  • T. E. Van Rheenen,

    Corresponding author
    1. Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, School of Health Sciences, Brain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre (BPsyC), Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    2. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    • Tamsyn Van Rheenen, Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Level 4, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia.

      E-mail: tvanrheenen@swin.edu.au

    Search for more papers by this author
  • D. Meyer,

    1. Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, School of Health Sciences, Brain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre (BPsyC), Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • S. L. Rossell

    1. Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, School of Health Sciences, Brain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre (BPsyC), Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    2. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objective

Converging evidence suggests that in bipolar disorder (BD), social cognition and emotion regulation are affected by the capacity for effective neurocognitive function. Adaptive emotion regulation may also rely on intact social cognition, and it is possible that social cognition acts as a mediator in its relationship with neurocognition. We aimed to address this hypothesis by explicitly examining interrelationships among neurocognition, social cognition and emotion regulation in an out-patient sample meeting criteria for a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of BD compared with controls.

Method

Fifty-one BD patients and 52 healthy controls completed a battery of tests assessing neurocognition, social cognition (emotion perception and theory of mind) and emotion regulation.

Results

Path analysis revealed that in BD, neurocognition was associated with social cognition, but social cognition was not associated with emotion regulation as expected. In contrast, a component of social cognition was found to mediate the relationship between neurocognition and emotion regulation in healthy controls.

Conclusion

These findings highlight differences in the pattern of associations between neurocognition, social cognition and emotion regulation across BD patients and controls. In the present data, these results appear to indicate that neurocognitive and social cognitive abilities generally operate in isolation from emotion regulation in BD.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary