1469-1795/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=60960010bf3239bf592b393edd9269aeba1365be)
1469-1795/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=897b42ba6f640a41386f5e1ad0e372f1abfcb0be)
COMMENTARY
You have free access to this content
Benefits and costs of using a lungworm parasite to control invasive toads in Australia
Article first published online: 18 DEC 2012
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12008
© 2012 The Zoological Society of London
Additional Information
How to Cite
Harris, R. N. (2012), Benefits and costs of using a lungworm parasite to control invasive toads in Australia. Animal Conservation, 15: 555–556. doi: 10.1111/acv.12008
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 18 DEC 2012
References
- & (2008). From environmental to ecological ethics: toward a practical ethics for ecologists and conservationists. Sci. Eng. Ethics 14, 483–501.
- & (2012). Typhoid Mary in the frogpond: can we use native frogs to disseminate a lungworm biocontrol for invasive cane toads? Anim. Conserv. 15, 545–552.Direct Link:
- , , , & (2010). Modern approaches for the biological control of vertebrate pests: an Australian perspective. Biol. Control 52, 288–295.
- & (2010). Invasive species control: understanding conflicts between researchers and the general community. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 400–406.
- & (1996). How risky is biological control? Ecology 77, 1965–1974.