• Ball, I.R., Possingham, H.P. & Watts, M. (2009). Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation. In Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools: 185195. Moilanen, A. , Wilson, K.A. & Possingham, H.P. (Eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cramer, V.A., Hobbs, R.J. & Standish, R.J. (2008). What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 23, 104112.
  • Davies, K.F., Margules, C.R. & Lawrence, J.F. (2004). A synergistic effect puts rare, specialized species at greater risk of extinction. Ecology 85, 265271.
  • Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jackson, S.T. & Sax, D.F. (2010). Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 25, 153160.
  • Krauss, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. (2003). Local species immigration, extinction and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation. Oecologia 137, 591602.
  • Moilanen, A. (2007). Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: unifying reserve selection strategies. Biol. Conserv. 134, 571579.
  • Soga, M. & Koike, S. (2013). Mapping the potential extinction debt of butterflies in a modern city: implications for conservation priorities in urban landscapes. Anim. Conserv. 16, 111.