SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
acv12038-sup-0001-si.doc995K

Figure S1. Percent of ancestors known per parental generation (pedigree completeness).

Figure S2. Correlations between covariates. (A) all 1343 individuals, (B) 758 individuals, after exclusion of unviable animals.

Figure S3. Frequency distribution of individual's inbreeding coefficient (fi).

Figure S4. Frequency distribution of sire (fs) and dam inbreeding coefficients (fd).

Figure S5. Frequency distribution of sire (sA) and dam ages (dA).

Figure S6. Frequency distribution of sire (sE) and dam experience (dE).

Figure S7. Frequency distribution of generations in captivity (G).

Figure S8. Frequency distribution of litter sizes (LS).

Figure S9. Frequency distribution of animals inside and outside the natural range of the species.

Table S1. Number of individuals, average inbreeding, and percentage of inbred animals in each generation

Table S2. Models considered within the ΔAIC ≤ 4 for the 7-day period.

Table S3. Models considered within the ΔAIC ≤ 4 for the 30-day period.

Table S4. Models considered within the ΔAIC ≤ 4 for the 180-day period.

Table S5. Models considered within the ΔAIC ≤ 4 for the 365-day period.

Table S6. Models considered within the ΔAIC ≤ 4 for litter sizes.

Table S7. Models considered within the ΔAIC ≤ 4 for the proportional viability.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.