SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Pashler H., Wagenmakers E. J. Editors' introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: a crisis of confidence? Perspect Psychol Sci 2012; 7: 528530.
  • 2
    Ioannidis J. P. A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2: 696701.
  • 3
    Open Science Collaboration. An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012; 7: 657660.
  • 4
    Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). Transparent reporting of trials. 2013. Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org/ (accessed 15 January 2013).
  • 5
    Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. 2013. Available at: http://www.prisma-statement.org/ (accessed 15 January 2013).
  • 6
    STROBE. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. 2013. Available at: http://www.strobe-statement.org/ (accessed 15 January 2013).
  • 7
    TREND. Transparent reporting of evaluations with nonrandomised designs. 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/trendstatement/ (accessed 15 January 2013).
  • 8
    Kilkenny C., Browne W. J., Cuthill I. C., Emerson M., Altman D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 2010; 8: e1000412.
  • 9
    Brown K. G., Reidy J. G., Weighall A. R., Arden M. A. Graphic imagery is not sufficient for increased attention to cigarette warnings: the role of text captions. Addiction 2013; 108: 820825.
  • 10
    Anonymous. Making methods clearer. Nat Neurosci [editorial]. 2013; 16: 12.