Alcohol-related biases in selective attention and action tendency make distinct contributions to dysregulated drinking behaviour

Authors

  • Jason M. Sharbanee,

    Corresponding author
    • Centre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Werner G. K. Stritzke,

    1. Centre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Reinout W. Wiers,

    1. Addiction, Development, and Psychopathology Lab (Adapt Lab), Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Colin MacLeod

    1. Centre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence to: Jason Sharbanee, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. E-mail: jason.sharbanee@grs.uwa.edu.au

Abstract

Aims

To assess whether alcohol-related biases in selective-attention and action tendency uniquely or concurrently predict the ability to regulate alcohol consumption.

Design and participants

Two groups of undergraduate social drinkers (total n = 55) who differed in their ability to regulate their alcohol consumption completed a novel Selective-Attention/Action-Tendency Task (SA/ATT), which assessed separately alcohol-related biases in selective attention and action tendency.

Setting

University of Western Australia, Australia.

Measurement

Dysregulated drinking was operationalized as a self-reported high level of alcohol consumption on the Alcohol Consumption Questionnaire, and a high desire to reduce consumption on the Brief Readiness to Change Algorithm. Selective attention and action tendency were assessed using the SA/ATT, working memory was assessed using the operation-span task and participant characteristics were assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES).

Findings

Results indicated that (i) there was no significant association between alcohol-related biases in selective attention and action tendency, r = 0.16, P = 0.274, and (ii) biases towards alcohol, in both selective attention, β = 1.01, odds ratio = 2.74, P = 0.022, and action tendency, β = 1.24, odds ratio = 3.45, P = 0.015, predicted independent variance in dysregulated-drinker status.

Conclusion

Biases in selective attention and action tendency appear to be distinct mechanisms that contribute independently to difficulty regulating alcohol consumption. Treatment components that could be combined to target both mechanisms could enhance treatment outcomes for alcohol-use disorders.

Ancillary