Addiction

© Society for the Study of Addiction

Cover image for Vol. 106 Issue 11

November 2011

Volume 106, Issue 11

Pages 1883–2053

  1. EDITORIAL

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
      Russia and human immunodeficiency virus—beyond crime and punishment (pages 1883–1885)

      JEFFREY H. SAMET

      Article first published online: 18 AUG 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03523.x

  2. FOR DEBATE

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. Basing drug scheduling decisions on scientific ranking of harmfulness: false promise from false premises (pages 1886–1890)

      Jonathan P. Caulkins, Peter Reuter and Carolyn Coulson

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03461.x

  3. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
      NUTT ET AL.'S HARM SCALES FOR DRUGS—ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT BUT BETTER POLICY BASED ON SCIENCE WITH LIMITATIONS THAN NO SCIENCE AT ALL (pages 1891–1892)

      BENEDIKT FISCHER and PERRY KENDALL

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03487.x

    2. You have free access to this content
      LET NOT THE BEST BE THE ENEMY OF THE GOOD (pages 1892–1893)

      DAVID NUTT

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03527.x

    3. You have free access to this content
      CAN HARM RATINGS BE USEFUL? (pages 1893–1894)

      INGEBORG ROSSOW

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03535.x

    4. You have free access to this content
      IMPROVED RANKING OF DRUGS ON HARMFULNESS CAN BRING SENSE AND ORDER TO A FAILED SYSTEM (pages 1894–1895)

      ISIDORE S. OBOT

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03560.x

    5. You have free access to this content
      SCALES AND BLINKERS, MOTES AND BEAMS – WHOSE VIEW IS OBSTRUCTED ON DRUG SCHEDULING? (pages 1895–1896)

      ROBIN ROOM

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03548.x

    6. You have free access to this content
      RESPONSE TO COMMENTARIES (pages 1896–1898)

      JONATHAN P. CAULKINS, PETER REUTER and CAROLYN COULSON

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03590.x

  4. POLICY CASE STUDIES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. What can we learn from the Dutch cannabis coffeeshop system? (pages 1899–1910)

      Robert J. MacCoun

      Article first published online: 11 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03572.x

  5. REVIEW

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. A systematic review of methamphetamine precursor regulations (pages 1911–1924)

      Rebecca McKetin, Rachel Sutherland, David A. Bright and Melissa M. Norberg

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03582.x

  6. RESEARCH REPORTS

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. Housewife or working mum—each to her own? The relevance of societal factors in the association between social roles and alcohol use among mothers in 16 industrialized countries (pages 1925–1932)

      Sandra Kuntsche, Ronald A. Knibbe, Emmanuel Kuntsche and Gerhard Gmel

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03507.x

    2. You have free access to this content
      Commentary on Kuntsche et al. (2011): Mothers and bottles – the role of gender norms in shaping drinking (pages 1933–1934)

      ELIZABETH MITCHELL ARMSTRONG

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03639.x

    3. DSM-IV to DSM-5: the impact of proposed revisions on diagnosis of alcohol use disorders (pages 1935–1943)

      Arpana Agrawal, Andrew C. Heath and Michael T. Lynskey

      Article first published online: 18 AUG 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03517.x

    4. You have free access to this content
      Commentary on Agrawal et al. (2011): Assessing the impact of changes to diagnostic criteria on the estimated prevalence of alcohol use disorders in general population surveys (pages 1944–1945)

      TIM SLADE, MAREE TEESSON, NATACHA CARRAGHER and MICHAEL FARRELL

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03597.x

    5. Drinking behaviour among men and women in China: the 2007 China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance (pages 1946–1956)

      Yichong Li, Yong Jiang, Mei Zhang, Peng Yin, Fan Wu and Wenhua Zhao

      Article first published online: 19 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03514.x

    6. The role of alcohol in the Russian mortality crisis (pages 1957–1965)

      Thor Norström

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03513.x

    7. The effect of neighborhood deprivation and residential relocation on long-term injection cessation among injection drug users (IDUs) in Baltimore, Maryland (pages 1966–1974)

      Becky L. Genberg, Stephen J. Gange, Vivian F. Go, David D. Celentano, Gregory D. Kirk, Carl A. Latkin and Shruti H. Mehta

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03501.x

    8. You have free access to this content
      Commentary on Genberg et al. (2011): The structural vulnerability imposed by hypersegregated US inner-city neighborhoods – a theoretical and practical challenge for substance abuse research (pages 1975–1977)

      PHILIPPE BOURGOIS and LAURIE KAIN HART

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03615.x

    9. The impact of needle and syringe provision and opiate substitution therapy on the incidence of hepatitis C virus in injecting drug users: pooling of UK evidence (pages 1978–1988)

      Katy M. E. Turner, Sharon Hutchinson, Peter Vickerman, Vivian Hope, Noel Craine, Norah Palmateer, Margaret May, Avril Taylor, Daniela De Angelis, Sheila Cameron, John Parry, Margaret Lyons, David Goldberg, Elizabeth Allen and Matthew Hickman

      Article first published online: 24 AUG 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03515.x

    10. You have free access to this content
      Commentary on Turner et al. (2011): Significant global scale-up of harm reduction interventions and pragmatic research approaches needed to prevent hepatitis C transmission (pages 1989–1990)

      CAROLYN DAY and LIBBY TOPP

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03599.x

    11. You have free access to this content
      Mephedrone: use, subjective effects and health risks (pages 1991–1996)

      Adam Winstock, Luke Mitcheson, John Ramsey, Susannah Davies, Malgorzata Puchnarewicz and John Marsden

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03502.x

    12. Long-term effects of a community-based intervention: 5-year follow-up of ‘Clubs against Drugs’ (pages 1997–2004)

      Johanna Gripenberg Abdon, Eva Wallin and Sven Andréasson

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03573.x

    13. Planned quit attempts among Ontario smokers: impact on abstinence (pages 2005–2013)

      Taryn Sendzik, Paul W. McDonald, K. Stephen Brown, David Hammond and Roberta Ferrence

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03498.x

  7. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
      WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT UNPLANNED QUIT ATTEMPTS? PRACTICALLY NOTHING OR NOTHING PRACTICAL? (pages 2014–2015)

      JAMES O. PROCHASKA

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03555.x

    2. You have free access to this content
      A RESPONSE TO PROCHASKA: LIFE DOES NOT ALWAYS GO ACCORDING TO PLAN; YOUR QUITTING MIGHT NOT EITHER (pages 2015–2016)

      TARYN SENDZIK, PAUL W. MCDONALD, K. STEPHEN BROWN, DAVID HAMMOND and ROBERTA FERRENCE

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03598.x

  8. RESEARCH REPORTS

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy (pages 2017–2028)

      Jean-François Etter and Chris Bullen

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03505.x

    2. You have free access to this content
      Commentary on Etter & Bullen (2011): Could E-cigs become the ultimate nicotine maintenance device? (pages 2029–2030)

      JONATHAN FOULDS and SUSAN VELDHEER

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03532.x

    3. The timing of smoking onset, prolonged abstinence and relapse in men: a prospective study from ages 18 to 32 years (pages 2031–2038)

      David C. R. Kerr, Lee D. Owen and Deborah M. Capaldi

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03500.x

    4. Statistical analysis of daily smoking status in smoking cessation clinical trials (pages 2039–2046)

      Yimei Li, E. Paul Wileyto and Daniel F. Heitjan

      Article first published online: 18 AUG 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03519.x

  9. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
      REVERSING THE TAXES APPROACH FOR A WIN–WIN TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY (page 2047)

      ALAIN BRAILLON

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03595.x

    2. You have free access to this content
      EQUITY CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CALCULATION OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS IN SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER POPULATIONS (pages 2047–2048)

      STUART J. GILMOUR

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03606.x

  10. NEWS AND NOTES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
      News and Notes : Compiled by John Witton and Jean O'Reilly (pages 2049–2052)

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03659.x

  11. ERRATUM

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
      Erratum (page 2053)

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03677.x

      This article corrects:

      Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use

      Vol. 106, Issue 9, 1667–1674, Article first published online: 5 AUG 2011

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION