Addiction

Cover image for Vol. 106 Issue 11

November 2011

Volume 106, Issue 11

Pages 1883–2053

  1. EDITORIAL

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
  2. FOR DEBATE

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
  3. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
    3. You have free access to this content
      CAN HARM RATINGS BE USEFUL? (pages 1893–1894)

      INGEBORG ROSSOW

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03535.x

    4. You have free access to this content
    5. You have free access to this content
    6. You have free access to this content
      RESPONSE TO COMMENTARIES (pages 1896–1898)

      JONATHAN P. CAULKINS, PETER REUTER and CAROLYN COULSON

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03590.x

  4. POLICY CASE STUDIES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
  5. REVIEW

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. A systematic review of methamphetamine precursor regulations (pages 1911–1924)

      Rebecca McKetin, Rachel Sutherland, David A. Bright and Melissa M. Norberg

      Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03582.x

  6. RESEARCH REPORTS

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
    3. Drinking behaviour among men and women in China: the 2007 China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance (pages 1946–1956)

      Yichong Li, Yong Jiang, Mei Zhang, Peng Yin, Fan Wu and Wenhua Zhao

      Article first published online: 19 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03514.x

    4. The effect of neighborhood deprivation and residential relocation on long-term injection cessation among injection drug users (IDUs) in Baltimore, Maryland (pages 1966–1974)

      Becky L. Genberg, Stephen J. Gange, Vivian F. Go, David D. Celentano, Gregory D. Kirk, Carl A. Latkin and Shruti H. Mehta

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03501.x

    5. You have free access to this content
    6. The impact of needle and syringe provision and opiate substitution therapy on the incidence of hepatitis C virus in injecting drug users: pooling of UK evidence (pages 1978–1988)

      Katy M. E. Turner, Sharon Hutchinson, Peter Vickerman, Vivian Hope, Noel Craine, Norah Palmateer, Margaret May, Avril Taylor, Daniela De Angelis, Sheila Cameron, John Parry, Margaret Lyons, David Goldberg, Elizabeth Allen and Matthew Hickman

      Article first published online: 24 AUG 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03515.x

    7. You have free access to this content
    8. You have free access to this content
      Mephedrone: use, subjective effects and health risks (pages 1991–1996)

      Adam Winstock, Luke Mitcheson, John Ramsey, Susannah Davies, Malgorzata Puchnarewicz and John Marsden

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03502.x

    9. Long-term effects of a community-based intervention: 5-year follow-up of ‘Clubs against Drugs’ (pages 1997–2004)

      Johanna Gripenberg Abdon, Eva Wallin and Sven Andréasson

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03573.x

    10. Planned quit attempts among Ontario smokers: impact on abstinence (pages 2005–2013)

      Taryn Sendzik, Paul W. McDonald, K. Stephen Brown, David Hammond and Roberta Ferrence

      Article first published online: 27 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03498.x

  7. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
      A RESPONSE TO PROCHASKA: LIFE DOES NOT ALWAYS GO ACCORDING TO PLAN; YOUR QUITTING MIGHT NOT EITHER (pages 2015–2016)

      TARYN SENDZIK, PAUL W. MCDONALD, K. STEPHEN BROWN, DAVID HAMMOND and ROBERTA FERRENCE

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03598.x

  8. RESEARCH REPORTS

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. Statistical analysis of daily smoking status in smoking cessation clinical trials (pages 2039–2046)

      Yimei Li, E. Paul Wileyto and Daniel F. Heitjan

      Article first published online: 18 AUG 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03519.x

  9. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
  10. NEWS AND NOTES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
  11. ERRATUM

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Caulkins et al. (2011)
    5. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    6. REVIEW
    7. RESEARCH REPORTS
    8. Commentaries on Sendzik et al. (2011)
    9. RESEARCH REPORTS
    10. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    11. NEWS AND NOTES
    12. ERRATUM
    1. You have free access to this content
      Erratum (page 2053)

      Article first published online: 6 OCT 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03677.x

      This article corrects:

      Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use

      Vol. 106, Issue 9, 1667–1674, Article first published online: 5 AUG 2011

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION