Addiction

Cover image for Vol. 109 Issue 5

May 2014

Volume 109, Issue 5

Pages 691–866

  1. EDITORIAL

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. You have free access to this content
  2. FOR DEBATE

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving (pages 693–698)

      Kathryn Graham, Peter Miller, Tanya Chikritzhs, Mark A. Bellis, John D. Clapp, Karen Hughes, Traci L. Toomey and Samantha Wells

      Article first published online: 25 JUN 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12247

  3. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
    3. You have free access to this content
    4. You have free access to this content
      Response to commentaries (pages 702–703)

      Kathryn Graham, Peter Miller, Tanya Chikritzhs, Mark A. Bellis, John D. Clapp, Karen Hughes, Traci L. Toomey and Samantha Wells

      Article first published online: 10 APR 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12444

  4. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. You have free access to this content
  5. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
  6. POLICY CASE STUDIES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. Overturn of the proposed alcohol advertising ban in Lithuania (pages 711–719)

      Ernesta Paukštė, Vaida Liutkutė, Mindaugas Štelemėkas, Nijolė Goštautaitė Midttun and Aurelijus Veryga

      Article first published online: 4 MAR 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12495

  7. REVIEW

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
  8. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. The Craving Experience Questionnaire: a brief, theory-based measure of consummatory desire and craving (pages 728–735)

      Jon May, Jackie Andrade, David J. Kavanagh, Gerald F. X. Feeney, Mathew J. Gullo, Dixie J. Statham, Jessica Skorka-Brown, Jennifer M. Connolly, Mandy Cassimatis, Ross McD. Young and Jason P. Connor

      Article first published online: 16 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12472

  9. RESEARCH REPORTS

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. Testing a social ecological model of alcohol use: the California 50-city study (pages 736–745)

      Paul J. Gruenewald, Lillian G. Remer and Elizabeth A. LaScala

      Article first published online: 19 JAN 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12438

    2. Facing temptation in the bar: counteracting the effects of self-control failure on young adults' ad libitum alcohol intake (pages 746–753)

      Roy Otten, Mira B. Cladder-Micus, J. Loes Pouwels, Maximilian Hennig, Angela A. T. Schuurmans and Roel C. J. Hermans

      Article first published online: 16 JAN 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12446

    3. Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers: a policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial (pages 754–765)

      Douglas Zatzick, Dennis M. Donovan, Gregory Jurkovich, Larry Gentilello, Chris Dunn, Joan Russo, Jin Wang, Christopher D. Zatzick, Jeff Love, Collin McFadden and Frederick P. Rivara

      Article first published online: 28 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12492

    4. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
      Motivational intervention to enhance post-detoxification 12-Step group affiliation: a randomized controlled trial (pages 766–773)

      John-Kåre Vederhus, Christine Timko, Øistein Kristensen, Bente Hjemdahl and Thomas Clausen

      Article first published online: 16 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12471

  10. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. You have free access to this content
  11. RESEARCH REPORTS

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a brief cannabis universal prevention program among adolescents in primary care (pages 786–797)

      Maureen A. Walton, Stella Resko, Kristen L. Barry, Stephen T. Chermack, Robert A. Zucker, Marc A. Zimmerman, Brenda M. Booth and Frederic C. Blow

      Article first published online: 12 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12469

    2. Does methamphetamine use increase violent behaviour? Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study (pages 798–806)

      Rebecca McKetin, Dan I. Lubman, Jake M. Najman, Sharon Dawe, Peter Butterworth and Amanda L. Baker

      Article first published online: 16 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12474

    3. Multiple distinct CHRNB3–CHRNA6 variants are genetic risk factors for nicotine dependence in African Americans and European Americans (pages 814–822)

      Robert C. Culverhouse, Eric O. Johnson, Naomi Breslau, Dorothy K. Hatsukami, Brooke Sadler, Andrew I. Brooks, Victor M. Hesselbrock, Marc A. Schuckit, Jay A. Tischfield, Alison M. Goate, Nancy L. Saccone and Laura J. Bierut

      Article first published online: 18 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12478

  12. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. You have free access to this content
      Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014): How genomics can bring us towards health equity (pages 823–824)

      Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing, Hollis Karoly and Kent E. Hutchison

      Article first published online: 10 APR 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12529

  13. RESEARCH REPORTS

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. Effectiveness of proactive quitline counselling for smoking parents recruited through primary schools: results of a randomized controlled trial (pages 830–841)

      Kathrin Schuck, Jonathan B. Bricker, Roy Otten, Marloes Kleinjan, Thomas H. Brandon and Rutger C. M. E. Engels

      Article first published online: 18 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12485

    2. The risk for persistent adult alcohol and nicotine dependence: the role of childhood maltreatment (pages 842–850)

      Jennifer C. Elliott, Malka Stohl, Melanie M. Wall, Katherine M. Keyes, Renee D. Goodwin, Andrew E. Skodol, Robert F. Krueger, Bridget F. Grant and Deborah S. Hasin

      Article first published online: 16 FEB 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12477

  14. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
      Response to letter from Barry & Dennis (pages 853–854)

      Kathryn Graham, Peter Miller, Tanya Chikritzhs, Mark A. Bellis, John D. Clapp, Karen Hughes, Traci L. Toomey and Samantha Wells

      Article first published online: 19 JAN 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12430

    3. You have free access to this content
      The state of data collection on addiction in Iran (page 854)

      Amir Moghanibashi-Mansourieh and Abbas Deilamizade

      Article first published online: 10 MAR 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12505

  15. BOOK REVIEW

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
  16. NEWS AND NOTES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. You have free access to this content
  17. REFEREES

    1. Top of page
    2. EDITORIAL
    3. FOR DEBATE
    4. Commentaries on Graham et al. (2014)
    5. STAND-ALONE COMMENTARY
    6. NATIONAL GAMBLING EXPERIENCES
    7. POLICY CASE STUDIES
    8. REVIEW
    9. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    10. RESEARCH REPORTS
    11. Commentary on Barratt et al. (2014)
    12. RESEARCH REPORTS
    13. Commentary on Culverhouse et al. (2014)
    14. RESEARCH REPORTS
    15. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    16. BOOK REVIEW
    17. NEWS AND NOTES
    18. REFEREES
    1. Referees (pages 860–866)

      Article first published online: 10 APR 2014 | DOI: 10.1111/add.12532

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION