SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Adaptive immunity;
  • female genital mutilation;
  • female reproductive tract;
  • HIV ;
  • immune cells;
  • innate immunity;
  • window of vulnerability sexual trauma

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause
  5. Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)
  6. Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT
  7. Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition
  8. Acknowledgement
  9. References

Studies on HIV acquisition and transmission in women exposed to sexual trauma throughout their life cycle are lacking, but some findings suggest that rates of HIV acquisition through coercive sex are significantly higher than that seen in consensual sex. Sexual trauma can also occur as a result of female genital mutilation, which makes sex extremely painful and can cause increased abrasions, lacerations, and inflammation, which enhances the risk of HIV acquisition. This review presents an overview of the immune system in the human female reproductive tract (FRT) from adolescence, through puberty to pregnancy and menopause. What is clear is that the foundation of information on immune protection in the FRT throughout the life cycle of women is extremely limited and at some stages such as adolescence and menopause are grossly lacking. Against this backdrop, forced or coercive sexual intercourse as well as genital mutilation further complicates our understanding of the biological risk factors that can result in transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause
  5. Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)
  6. Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT
  7. Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition
  8. Acknowledgement
  9. References

The global HIV pandemic is now into its third decade with 30 million dead and 34 million currently living with HIV.[1] Globally, young women aged 15–24 are most vulnerable to HIV with infection rates twice as high as in young men and accounting for 22% of all new HIV infections.[2] The reasons for this are both social and biological. Women, especially young women, may be less able to negotiate condom use and are more likely to experience coerced sex.[1, 3-5] Biologically, women are more likely than men to be infected in heterosexual encounters,[6, 7] and critical endocrine and immunological parameters that are as yet ill defined play a major role in enhancing susceptibility in women and girls.

HIV can affect multiple dimensions of women's sexual and reproductive health, fertility/pregnancy, breast-feeding, use of contraception, exposure to sexually transmitted infections (STI), and exposure to sexual violence.[3, 5, 8-10] Most women exposed to HIV and/or living with AIDS suffer from or fear stigmatization brought about through perceptions of promiscuity, blamed for bringing HIV in the family, transmitting HIV to her children, and violation of reproductive rights by forcible sterilization.[5, 11]

Sexual assault (SA) and female genital mutilation (FGM) constitute forms of sexual violence with important implications for HIV acquisition and transmission. SA is widespread all over the world including the USA.[12, 13] In a representative survey of over 9000 adults, 10.6% of women reported having coercive sex at some point of their lives. Among adolescents, 60.4% reported coercive sex before the age of 18, and 25.5% girls reported rape before the age of 12.[14] Sexual trauma alters a woman's risk of HIV acquisition. Violence against women is strongly correlated with a woman's risk of becoming infected with HIV.[3, 5] The epidemics of violence and HIV overlap intricately. Violence or the fear of it may interfere with a woman's ability to negotiate safer sex or refuse unwanted sex. Forced or coercive sexual intercourse can result in transmission of HIV and other STIs. The risk of transmission increases as vaginal lacerations and abrasions occur during rape, especially if it occurs repeatedly. Further, violence against a woman can interfere with her ability to access treatment and care, maintain adherence to antiretroviral therapy, or carry out her infant-feeding choice. Fear of violence is also a major barrier to disclosing HIV status. Studies in sub-Saharan Africa have found higher risks of disclosure-related violence compared with studies in the United States.[5, 15, 16]

The mucosa of the female reproductive tract (FRT) has evolved to meet the unique requirements of balancing immune protection against sexually transmitted pathogens, while being supportive to allogeneic spermatozoa and an immunologically distinct fetus.[17, 18] Accordingly, both the innate and adaptive immune systems in the FRT are responsive to and precisely regulated by the female sex hormones, estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4).[18] The modulation by sex hormones results in altering a woman's susceptibility to HIV and other STI through the course of her life cycle. The risks, therefore, are distinct during adolescence, stages of menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and menopause. In this review, we aim to address the underlying immunobiology of HIV acquisition in women and how it might be affected by sexual trauma through her life cycle.

Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause
  5. Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)
  6. Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT
  7. Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition
  8. Acknowledgement
  9. References

Sex hormones E2 and P4 regulate various aspects of FRT immune system both directly and indirectly.[19, 20] Innate immune protection against FRT pathogens is multi-factorial and multi-layered. Soluble mediators, both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory, are produced by cells of the FRT, and many are regulated by E2 and P4.[19, 21, 22] Pro-inflammatory mediators can enhance HIV replication/infection, whereas anti-inflammatory mediators and/or antimicrobials can be protective and inhibit HIV replication/infection.[23] Susceptibility to a pathogen for a given woman can therefore change, depending on her hormonal status (e.g. adolescence, stages of menstrual cycle, pregnancy, menopause[22-24]).

The first point of contact between HIV and host is the epithelial barrier of the FRT. Whereas all sexual encounters cause microtrauma in the epithelium, repeated coercive sex enhances the trauma and compromises the epithelial lining to facilitate viral entry. Pre-existing STI also create an inflammatory microenvironment which also facilitates HIV infection.

Adolescence

Epidemiological studies indicate that adolescent girls are particularly susceptible to HIV infection.[25, 26] Although much is attributed to high-risk behavior, underlying biological mechanisms are poorly understood. Young girls are highly susceptible to sexual violence and sustain more injuries than adults especially in cases of repeated coercive sex.[27, 28] The anatomy of the FRT is a determinant for HIV acquisition. Whereas the vaginal and ectocervical epithelium is protected by multi-layer squamous epithelial cells, the cervical epithelium is composed of columnar epithelial cells which breach easily. In the human FRT, the point of entry for HIV is thought to be the transitional zone between the ectocervix composed of squamous cells and the endocervix composed of columnar epithelial cells.[29] During adolescence, the cervix is immature and characterized by ectopy, a condition in which the endocervical columnar epithelium protrudes through the cervix and onto the vaginal portion of the ectocervix, thereby enhancing the risk for acquiring HIV.[25] Recent studies show anal sex is highly prevalent in the adolescent population especially in cases of coercive sex and in girls who have undergone FGM.[27, 28, 30, 31] As in the endocervix, the rectal epithelium is also composed of a single layer of columnar epithelial cells, which is easily damaged with sexual trauma. Adolescents who are victims of SA have been reported to have more anogenital injuries than older women.[27, 28] This population is also characterized by high levels of STI, which in combination of cervical ectopy, further enhances risks for HIV acquisition. Oral contraceptive use has also been linked to increasing risk in this population. Finally, mucosal immune factors in the FRT are very different when comparing adolescent and adult women. As the menstrual cycle is irregular during adolescence, protection by hormonally induced immune factors can be lacking. Hwang et al. and Madan et al.[25, 26] reported higher levels of inflammatory cytokines in the adolescent FRT compared to adults. Madan et al.[26] also reported reduced levels of protective factors such as defensins and SLPI as well as a difference in genital tract microbiome that enhances the risk of HIV acquisition even further.

Reproductive Age and The Window of Vulnerability

Under the control of the hypothalamus and pituitary, ovarian production of E2 and P4 is low during menses. In response to follicle stimulating hormone, follicle growth and maturation occur with increased production of E2. At midcycle, estradiol levels rise sharply to stimulate the release of luteinizing hormone (LH), which initiates ovulation. Following ovulation, LH stimulates the formation and maintenance of the corpus luteum, which produces estradiol and progesterone during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. These hormones, in turn, prepare the reproductive tract for fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy.[32] It is against this changing pattern of hormones that the immune system at each of site throughout the FRT is regulated to optimize conditions for reproductive success.

Numerous studies have shown that the reproductive tract of women is periodically exposed to a number of pathogens, commensals, allogeneic sperm, and the developing semi-allogeneic fetus. To meet these challenges, the immune system has evolved to maintain a level of protection that distinguishes between these challenges. Studies from our laboratory led to the conclusion that, during a normal menstrual cycle, there is a window of vulnerability (7–10 days) during which the potential for HIV and possibly other STI in the FRT is optimized, as a result of E2 and P4 suppression of aspects of the innate, humoral, and cell-mediated immune systems.[24] As discussed in detail elsewhere,[24] immune suppression occurs in the upper (Fallopian tubes and uterus) and lower (cervix and vagina) reproductive tract as a part of the physiological process that prepares the reproductive tract for reproduction. Acting directly and indirectly through growth factors and cytokines, E2 and P4 both suppress and enhance immune cell migration, cytotoxic T-cell activity, coreceptor expression, antibody and antimicrobial secretion, and innate immune cell function. These changes coincide with ovulation and persist throughout most of the secretory phase of the cycle. One example is the activity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), which kill cancer cells and virally infected cells present in the FRT. CTL activity is suppressed in the uterus but not in the cervix and vagina during the secretory stage of the menstrual cycle and occurs without changes in the number of CD8+ T cells in reproductive tract tissues.[33, 34] Of equal importance are the findings of others showing that immature and mature dendritic cells (DC), when cultured with TGFβ, upregulate coreceptor expression (CXCR4, CCR5).[35] Given that estradiol stimulates FRT secretion of TGFβ,[36] these studies suggested that estradiol acts indirectly to alter coreceptor expression on immune cells in the FRT. These and other cycle-dependent changes are presented in greater detail in other sections of this chapter.

Evidence in support of a ‘window’ has recently been demonstrated in the primate model.[37] Using repeated, low-dose Simian–human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) vaginal exposure, Vishwanathan et al. concluded that a ‘window’ of most frequent virus transmission exists between days 24 and 31 of the menstrual cycle (late luteal phase). These findings provide the first proof of concept that susceptibility to vaginal SHIV exposure is elevated in the second half of the menstrual cycle. Further studies are needed to determine whether susceptibility to infection during the ‘window’ is unique to HIV or a characteristic of the FRT that includes other sexually transmitted pathogens. What is clear is that immune protection varies with the site studied in the FRT and hormonal balance during the menstrual cycle.

Although no studies have investigated the association between incidence of genital injury and stage of the menstrual cycle, one study reported that all nine women having their menstrual period at the time of the assault sustained injury.[38] As sex hormones regulate the immunobiology of the FRT,[21] hormonal status at the time of the assault may be relevant for HIV acquisition.

Pregnancy

Studies have indicated higher rates of HIV acquisition in women during pregnancy.[8] The mechanisms are likely to be social as well as biological. Pregnant women are vulnerable to sexual violence from intimate partners.[39] Pregnant women who are HIV positive or at a high risk for HIV transmission through their partners might not get tested, disclose status, or access healthcare system, due to fear of violence and stigmatization.[5] From an immunological perspective, the FRT in pregnant women is distinct from that seen in non-pregnant women. Traditionally, pregnancy has been defined as a general state of immune suppression. However, this notion has been challenged recently with an evolution of our understanding. Pregnancy seems to be both a pro-inflammatory and an anti-inflammatory state depending on the stage of gestation.[40] Recent publications by Ghartey et al.[41] and Anderson et al.[42] have demonstrated alterations in soluble mediators in genital tract secretions in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women. Both studies reported higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and lower levels of protective endogenous antimicrobials in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women. These findings may have important clinical implications as a more inflammatory and less-protective microenvironment has the potential to attract HIV-target cells and thereby increase risk of acquisition.

Menopause

Older women are also susceptible to sexual violence.[43] Although post-menopausal women do not have to worry about pregnancy following an assault, they are more vulnerable to injury and infections.[43] There is considerable thinning of the vaginal epithelium following menopause, which, coupled with vaginal dryness, leads to greater trauma during sex. Trauma is more severe in cases of non-consensual sex. Other severe injuries are also sustained in older women due to osteoporosis, which requires a longer time for healing.[43] As multiple immune factors of the FRT are estrogen-responsive, the loss of estrogen with aging results in loss of Toll-like receptor (TLR) function, secretory antimicrobial components, commensal lactobacilli, and acidity of vaginal microenvironment.[22] There is also reduced production of cervical mucus, which itself is a protective barrier against pathogens.[22] Post-menopausal women show higher chronic levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, MCP-1, and TNFα as well as a reduced ability to respond to pathogens or stimuli.[44-46] This inflammatory microenvironment devoid of protective antimicrobials can enhance risk of HIV acquisition in post-menopausal women.

Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause
  5. Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)
  6. Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT
  7. Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition
  8. Acknowledgement
  9. References

Female reproductive tract has unique requirements for the regulation of immune protection as it must deal with sexually transmitted bacterial and viral pathogens, allogeneic spermatozoa, and the immunologically distinct fetus. The FRT has evolved immune mechanisms to protect against pathogens without compromising fetal survival. The mucosal immune system of the FRT is under hormonal control that regulates the transport of immunoglobulins (Igs), the levels of cytokines, the distribution of various cell populations, and antigen presentation in the genital tissues during the reproductive cycle.[18] In addition to protecting against infectious agents, it must adapt to a spectrum of physiological events that includes fertilization, implantation, pregnancy, and parturition. A balance is maintained by sex hormones, especially estradiol and progesterone, throughout the menstrual cycle to respond to the challenges of pathogenic invasion without interfering with events that surround conception. During pregnancy, in addition to protecting against infection, the mucosal immune system adapts to support a fetal placental unit that is immunologically distinct. To meet these challenges, the reproductive tract has evolved into separate compartments consisting of ovaries, the Fallopian tubes, uterus, cervix, and vagina that are precisely regulated by estradiol and progesterone. Failure of the immune system either to rid the reproductive tract of pathogens or to resist attacking allogeneic sperm and fetus significantly compromises procreation as well as the health of the mother.[18]

Soluble mediators in the FRT that are hormonally regulated have been described. Each stage of the life cycle of women is characterized by changes in sex hormones, which result in altered protection against HIV acquisition. As discussed previously, in healthy adult women, stages of menstrual cycle are characterized by differential levels of soluble mediators, thereby creating a ‘window of vulnerability’ during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle when women are most vulnerable to STI and HIV acquisition.[24] Cervical–vaginal lavage (CVL) contains soluble mediators that have intrinsic anti-HIV and anti-HSV activity; these can change with disease progression.[23, 47, 48] In adolescent girls where sex hormone levels are fluctuating, more inflammatory mediators and less-protective mediators have been reported.[26] In the same study, CVL from adolescent girls had diminished ability to inhibit Escherichia coli, but enhanced ability to inhibit HIV when compared to CVL from adult women. Levels of soluble mediators change during pregnancy depending on the week of gestation.[40] Anderson et al.[42] demonstrated that inflammatory mediators increase and protective mediators decrease in CVL from 14- to 26-week pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women. Interestingly, no difference was detected in intrinsic anti-HIV activity in this cohort, indicating other immune factors at play must be taken into consideration. As women age, reduction of estradiol correlates with reduction of protective immune mediators in the FRT such as SLPI.[19] Preliminary data from our laboratory show a reduction in anti-HIV activity in post-menopausal women compared to pre-menopausal women (M. Ghosh and C. Wira, unpublished data).

The role of sex hormones in the case of SA is unknown. It can be postulated that trauma will significantly alter the local immune microenvironment by changing levels of cytokines, chemokines, and antimicrobials. Coercive sex is likely to induce an immune response that will result in generalized local immune activation and an increased risk of HIV acquisition.

Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause
  5. Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)
  6. Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT
  7. Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition
  8. Acknowledgement
  9. References

In the context of SA, the antiviral effects of secretions, mucus, and epithelial barriers may be overcome by the presence of genital trauma, which provides easy access of HIV virions to susceptible immune cells present in the submucosa. Susceptible target cells are present all along the FRT and under hormonal control. These include CD4+ Tcells, macrophages, DC and Langerhans’ cells (LC). While the characteristics and distribution of these cell types in pre-menopausal adult and post-menopausal women are progressively better understood, no information is available for adolescents or pre-puberal girls. How differences attributable to hormonal changes and an immature immune system may contribute to the increased prevalence of HIV infection in girls and very young women is unknown.

CD4+ T cells are present in the vagina, cervix and endometrium, localized both in the sub-epithelial stroma and as intraepithelial lymphocytes between the epithelial cells lining the lumen.[21] Several studies strongly suggest that the initial main target cell for HIV replication are CD4+ T cells.[49-51] However, not all CD4+ T cells are equally susceptible to HIV infection, and the location and phenotype of these initial CD4+ T cell targets in the human FRT remain unknown. Expression of CCR5 can be detected in a subset of CD4+ T cells from endocervix obtained from cytobrush,[52] and this expression is higher in post-menopausal women compared to pre-menopausal controls,[53] suggesting a possible hormonal regulation of CCR5 expression. CCR5 expression levels in CD4+ T cells from girls and adolescents are unknown.

Macrophages are predominantly found in the endometrial stroma and myometrial connective tissue[18] with limited numbers present in the endo- or ectocervix. Sex hormones regulate the influx of macrophages into the endometrium, increasing their presence just prior to menstruation.[54] In contrast, vaginal macrophage numbers are not hormonally controlled.[18] The role of macrophages in initiating HIV infection in the FRT mucosa is controversial. Initial infection supported by macrophages from women was demonstrated in vitro,[55-57] but primate models of SIV infection did not support these findings. Macrophages may be involved in the initial steps of HIV infection in women either as cells supporting viral replication or through capture and transmission of virus to T cells.[58]

Dendritic cells sample antigens at mucosal surfaces and potentially are one of the first cells to encounter HIV.[59-62] As antigen-presenting cells, DCs generate and regulate adaptive immune responses.[63, 64] In the vagina, DCs reside predominantly within the epithelial layer,[65, 66] while in endometrium DCs are located in the sub-epithelial stroma. The movement of CD1a+ DCs into the FRT is regulated by cyclical hormonal changes with gradual increases from the proliferative to the secretory phases that peak at menses.[67] HIV can exploit the biological properties of DCs[68, 69] to spread virus from mucosal surfaces to lymph nodes, the main site for HIV replication. Although DC-SIGN can mediate HIV transmission from DCs to CD4+ T cells in vitro,[70, 71] the role of DC-SIGN+ DCs in sexual transmission in vivo is not well characterized. DC-SIGN+ DCs remain relatively constant in the human endometrium throughout the proliferative and secretory stages of the menstrual cycle.[72] Studies from our laboratory demonstrate that DC phenotype is modulated by uterine epithelial cells through secreted soluble factors, resulting in decreased sensitivity to TLR 3 and TLR4 stimulation and reduced expression of co-stimulatory molecules and DC-SIGN.[73, 74] Importantly, downregulation of DC-SIGN was associated with decreased HIV transinfection by immature DCs.[73] DCs also exert antiviral activity, which is susceptible to hormonal regulation as well. For example, increased production of α-defensins by immature DC was associated with slower disease progression in HIV-infected subjects,[75] and α-defensin production by immature DC can be inhibited by high doses of estradiol.[76, 77]

Langerhans’ cells constitute a subset of DCs only present in tissues. LCs display very different characteristics from one tissue to another; they express Langerin, a specific C-type lectin, and are predominantly found in stratified squamous epithelia in the lower FRT. Although LC can be productively infected in vitro, it has been speculated that their main role is capture and transfer of virions to susceptible cells.[62] Epidermal LCs demonstrated viral uptake through Langerin, which mediated internalization of HIV into Birbeck granules and degradation of the virus.[78] In contrast, in vaginal LCs, viral internalization occurred primarily by endocytosis, resulting in the presence of intact virions in the cytoplasm for days,[79] allowing migration of HIV-loaded LCs from the exposed vaginal epithelium and transfer of HIV to CD4+ T cells.[80]

Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause
  5. Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)
  6. Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT
  7. Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition
  8. Acknowledgement
  9. References

Sexual assault and FGM constitute forms of sexual violence with important implications for HIV acquisition and transmission. While SA and HIV are coexisting problems, little information is available regarding follow-up of victims of SA and seroconversion rates.[81] Nevertheless, it seems generally accepted that SA is a risk factor for HIV acquisition. In countries with high rates of HIV prevalence, SA rates are also high. In Kenya, rape accounts for 4% of HIV infection in adolescents, and over their lifetime, 24% of women are raped at least once.[82] In countries with low HIV prevalence, while the underlying community risk for HIV exposure is lower than 1%, victims of SA are likely exposed to higher risk than the community baseline.[83] Following SA, pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV, may be prevented with prompt treatment, and when given within 72 hr after SA, post-exposure prophylaxis was shown to reduce by 81% the risk of HIV seroconversion.[84] Prophylactic treatment after SA for hepatitis B, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and HIV is recommended by the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC).[85] Strikingly, however, these treatments are often not offered to women victims of SA.[83] Regarding HIV prophylaxis, a recent study found that while 89% of emergency department physicians interviewed offered prophylaxis for other STIs, only 45% offered counseling or HIV prophylaxis, and one-third of physicians working in hospitals with HIV prophylaxis included in their protocols did not typically offer this treatment.[83]

Possible explanations for how SA may increase the risk of HIV infection include genital injury, systemic extragenital trauma, forced anal intercourse, and concurrent transmission of other STIs as well as inability to negotiate condom use. Medico-legal reasons rather than a medical treatment interest are the current driving force for research on SA,[86] so little information is available comparing genital injury rates after consensual and non-consensual sexual intercourse. Genital injury after consented sex is rare, estimated in about 5–6% of cases, and more likely to occur in post-menopausal women.[86-88] All studies agree that genital injury after non-consensual sexual intercourse is significantly higher compared with consented sex, but incidence of injury vary depending on the method used to determine it.[86, 89] Gross visualization includes only bruising, abrasions, and lacerations as injuries and is seen in 40% of reported cases, while inspection by colposcopy, which includes ‘subjective’ injuries such as swelling and redness, results in up to 87% incidence.[86, 89] Presence of ‘subjective’ injuries in 87–92% of victims within 48 hr after SA[38] appears of extreme relevance as a risk factor for HIV acquisition, as it results in active inflammation and increased presence of HIV-target cells at the site of exposure. Although the specific inflammatory response after trauma due to SA has not been studied, it is well known that the immune system promptly reacts to tissue damage after traumatic injury.[90] Tissue damage releases inflammatory mediators which activate innate immune cells, particularly macrophages, while CD4+ T-cell responses are suppressed, probably due to increased regulatory T cells, resulting in T-cell anergy and increased risk of infections.[90] Studies of healing after genital injury in pre-puberal and adolescent girls show variability in resolution time. Depending on the type of lesion, healing can last from 2 days for superficial injuries up to more than 20 days for deep lacerations.[91] These findings imply that active inflammation can be present for an extended period of time after SA, which may have implications for increased HIV susceptibility after the event.

When comparing post- and pre-menopausal women, some studies suggest that post-menopausal women are more likely to be genitally injured following SA[92, 93] and more likely to suffer vaginal laceration, possibly due to atrophy of connective tissue and vaginal epithelium.[92] Genital injuries are also more likely to occur in very young women,[87, 92, 93] although one study did not find any correlation.[94]

Female genital mutilation represents a major form of child and female abuse.[95] FGM is defined as removal of the external female genitalia for non-therapeutic reasons and includes four different types: (i) clitoridectomy, (ii) excision (removal of clitoris and labia minora with or without labia majora), (iii) infibulations (narrowing of the vaginal opening with creation of a covering seal), and (iv) other harmful procedures for non-therapeutic reasons. While this practice is widespread in Africa, it also occurs in immigrant communities in North America and Europe.[95] The consequences of FGM are serious and multiple, including death, shock, tetanus, reduced fertility, vesicovaginal fistulae, and the potential enhanced risk of HIV and other STIs. Very few studies have analyzed the relationship between FGM and HIV infection,[96] but the risk of HIV acquisition is likely increased considering the extensive trauma, inflammation and increased vaginal epithelial damage. Moreover, it is common practice that the procedure will be performed with shared instruments not properly cleaned, increasing even more the trauma and complicating infections.[95]

In conclusion, in the context of SA and FGM, the mucosal microenvironment will be profoundly altered, and danger signals will attract and modify the phenotype of immune cells that are also target cells for the HIV, likely influencing HIV susceptibility. The role that sex hormones play in this process is completely unknown.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Life cycle of women: adolescence, reproductive age, and menopause
  5. Hormonal regulation of immunity in secretions (CVL)
  6. Hormonal control of HIV-target cells in the FRT
  7. Biological implications of sexual assault and female genital mutilation for HIV acquisition
  8. Acknowledgement
  9. References
  • 1
    WHO: Progress report 2011: global HIV/AIDS response, 2011.
  • 2
    UNAIDS: Fact sheet: adolescents, young people and HIV, 2012.
  • 3
    Garcia-Moreno C, Watts C: Violence against women: its importance for HIV/AIDS. AIDS 2000; 14(Suppl 3):S253S265.
  • 4
    Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB: The world report on violence and health. Lancet 2002; 360:10831088.
  • 5
    WHO: Sexual and reproductive health of women living with HIV/AIDS, 2006.
  • 6
    CDC: Basic information about HIV and AIDS, 2010.
  • 7
    Galvin SR, Cohen MS: The role of sexually transmitted diseases in HIV transmission. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2:3342.
  • 8
    Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Serwadda D, Sewankambo N, Li C, Wabwire-Mangen F, Paxton L, Kiwanuka N, Kigozi G, Konde-Lule J, Quinn TC, Gaydos CA, McNairn D: Population-based study of fertility in women with HIV-1 infection in Uganda. Lancet 1998; 351:98103.
  • 9
    Hunter SC, Isingo R, Boerma JT, Urassa M, Mwaluko GM, Zaba B: The association between HIV and fertility in a cohort study in rural Tanzania. J Biosoc Sci 2003; 35:189199.
  • 10
    Ross A, Van der Paal L, Lubega R, Mayanja BN, Shafer LA, Whitworth J: HIV-1 disease progression and fertility: the incidence of recognized pregnancy and pregnancy outcome in Uganda. AIDS 2004; 18:799804.
  • 11
    Mallet J, Kalambi V: Coerced and forced sterilization of HIV-positive women in Namibia. HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev 2008; 13:7778.
  • 12
    NIJCDC: Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women, 2000.
  • 13
    WHO: World report on violence and health, 2002.
  • 14
    CDC: Sexual violence, 2008.
  • 15
    Deribe K, Woldemichael K, Bernard N, Yakob B: Gender difference in HIV status disclosure among HIV positive service users. East Afr J Public Health 2009; 6:248255.
  • 16
    Rujumba J, Neema S, Byamugisha R, Tylleskar T, Tumwine JK, Heggenhougen HK: ‘Telling my husband I have HIV is too heavy to come out of my mouth’: pregnant women's disclosure experiences and support needs following antenatal HIV testing in eastern Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc 2012; 15:17429.
  • 17
    Ochiel DO, Fahey JV, Ghosh M, Haddad SN, Wira CR: Innate immunity in the female reproductive tract: role of sex hormones in regulating uterine epithelial cell protection against pathogens. Curr Womens Health Rev 2008; 4:102117.
  • 18
    Wira CR, Fahey JV, Sentman CL, Pioli PA, Shen L: Innate and adaptive immunity in female genital tract: cellular responses and interactions. Immunol Rev 2005; 206:306335.
  • 19
    Fahey JV, Wright JA, Shen L, Smith JM, Ghosh M, Rossoll RM, Wira CR: Estradiol selectively regulates innate immune function by polarized human uterine epithelial cells in culture. Mucosal Immunol 2008; 1:317325.
  • 20
    Heldring N, Pike A, Andersson S, Matthews J, Cheng G, Hartman J, Tujague M, Strom A, Treuter E, Warner M, Gustafsson JA: Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets. Physiol Rev 2007; 87:905931.
  • 21
    Hickey DK, Patel MV, Fahey JV, Wira CR: Innate and adaptive immunity at mucosal surfaces of the female reproductive tract: stratification and integration of immune protection against the transmission of sexually transmitted infections. J Reprod Immunol 2011; 88:185194.
  • 22
    Wira CR, Patel MV, Ghosh M, Mukura L, Fahey JV: Innate immunity in the human female reproductive tract: endocrine regulation of endogenous antimicrobial protection against HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Am J Reprod Immunol 2011; 65:196211.
  • 23
    Ghosh M, Fahey JV, Shen Z, Lahey T, Cu-Uvin S, Wu Z, Mayer K, Wright PF, Kappes JC, Ochsenbauer C, Wira CR: Anti-HIV activity in cervical-vaginal secretions from HIV-positive and -negative women correlate with innate antimicrobial levels and IgG antibodies. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e11366.
  • 24
    Wira CR, Fahey JV: A new strategy to understand how HIV infects women: identification of a window of vulnerability during the menstrual cycle. AIDS 2008; 22:19091917.
  • 25
    Hwang LY, Scott ME, Ma Y, Moscicki AB: Higher levels of cervicovaginal inflammatory and regulatory cytokines and chemokines in healthy young women with immature cervical epithelium. J Reprod Immunol 2011; 88:6671.
  • 26
    Madan RP, Carpenter C, Fiedler T, Kalyoussef S, McAndrew TC, Viswanathan S, Kim M, Keller MJ, Fredricks DN, Herold BC: Altered biomarkers of mucosal immunity and reduced vaginal lactobacillus concentrations in sexually active female adolescents. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:e40415.
  • 27
    Jones JS, Rossman L, Hartman M, Alexander CC: Anogenital injuries in adolescents after consensual sexual intercourse. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10:13781383.
  • 28
    Jones JS, Rossman L, Wynn BN, Dunnuck C, Schwartz N: Comparative analysis of adult versus adolescent sexual assault: epidemiology and patterns of anogenital injury. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10:872877.
  • 29
    Hirbod T, Kaldensjo T, Broliden K: In situ distribution of HIV-binding CCR5 and C-type lectin receptors in the human endocervical mucosa. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e25551.
  • 30
    Mayer KH, Anderson DJ: Heterosexual HIV transmission. Infect Agents Dis 1995; 4:273284.
  • 31
    Moss GB, Clemetson D, D'Costa L, Plummer FA, Ndinya-Achola JO, Reilly M, Holmes KK, Piot P, Maitha GM, Hillier SL, Kiviat NC, Cameron CW, Wamola IA, Kreiss JK: Association of cervical ectopy with heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus: results of a study of couples in Nairobi, Kenya. J Infect Dis 1991; 164:588591.
  • 32
    Wira CR, Fahey JV, White HD, Yeaman GR, Given AL, Howell AL: The mucosal immune system in the human female reproductive tract: influence of stage of the menstrual cycle and menopause on mucosal immunity in the uterus. In The Endometrium, S Glasser, J Aplin, L Guidice, S Tabibzadeh (eds). New York, Taylor and Francis, 2002, pp 371404.
  • 33
    White HD, Crassi KM, Givan AL, Stern JE, Gonzalez JL, Memoli VA, Green WR, Wira CR: CD3+ CD8+ CTL activity within the human female reproductive tract: influence of stage of the menstrual cycle and menopause. J Immunol 1997; 158:30173027.
  • 34
    White HD, Musey LK, Andrews MM, Yeaman GR, DeMars LR, Manganiello PD, Howell AL, Wira CR, Green WR, McElrath MJ: Human immunodeficiency virus-specific and CD3-redirected cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in the human female reproductive tract: lack of correlation between mucosa and peripheral blood. J Infect Dis 2001; 183:977983.
  • 35
    Sato K, Kawasaki H, Nagayama H, Enomoto M, Morimoto C, Tadokoro K, Juji T, Takahashi TA: TGF-beta 1 reciprocally controls chemotaxis of human peripheral blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells via chemokine receptors. J Immunol 2000; 164:22852295.
  • 36
    Casslén B, Sandberg T, Gustavsson B, Willén R, Nilbert M: Transforming growth factor beta1 in the human endometrium. Cyclic variation, increased expression by estradiol and progesterone, and regulation of plasminogen activators and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:13431350.
  • 37
    Vishwanathan SA, Guenthner PC, Lin CY, Dobard C, Sharma S, Adams DR, Otten RA, Heneine W, Hendry RM, McNicholl JM, Kersh EN: High susceptibility to repeated, low-dose, vaginal SHIV exposure late in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of pigtail macaques. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 57:261264.
  • 38
    Slaughter L, Brown CR, Crowley S, Peck R: Patterns of genital injury in female sexual assault victims. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:609616.
  • 39
    WHO: Intimate partner violence during pregnancy, 2011.
  • 40
    Mor G, Cardenas I, Abrahams V, Guller S: Inflammation and pregnancy: the role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011; 1221:8087.
  • 41
    Ghartey JP, Carpenter C, Gialanella P, Rising C, McAndrew TC, Mhatre M, Tugetman J, Einstein MH, Chazotte C, Herold BC: Association of bactericidal activity of genital tract secretions with Escherichia coli colonization in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; in press.
  • 42
    Anderson BL, Ghosh M, Raker C, Fahey J, Song Y, Rouse DJ, Wira CR, Cu-Uvin S: In vitro anti-HIV-1 activity in cervicovaginal secretions from pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:65 e61-10.
  • 43
    SASC: Sexual assault and the older woman. Available at: http://www.sascwr.org/files/www/resources_pdfs/sexual_assault/SEXUAL_ASSAULT_AND_THE_OLDER_WOMAN.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2012.
  • 44
    Gameiro CM, Romao F, Castelo-Branco C: Menopause and aging: changes in the immune system–a review. Maturitas 2010; 67:316320.
  • 45
    Goetzl EJ, Huang MC, Kon J, Patel K, Schwartz JB, Fast K, Ferrucci L, Madara K, Taub DD, Longo DL: Gender specificity of altered human immune cytokine profiles in aging. FASEB J 2010; 24:35803589.
  • 46
    Rollenhagen C, Asin SN: Enhanced HIV-1 replication in ex vivo ectocervical tissues from post-menopausal women correlates with increased inflammatory responses. Mucosal Immunol 2011; 4:671681.
  • 47
    Keller MJ, Guzman E, Hazrati E, Kasowitz A, Cheshenko N, Wallenstein S, Cole AL, Cole AM, Profy AT, Wira CR, Hogarty K, Herold BC: PRO 2000 elicits a decline in genital tract immune mediators without compromising intrinsic antimicrobial activity. AIDS 2007; 21:467476.
  • 48
    Lahey T, Ghosh M, Fahey JV, Shen Z, Mukura LR, Song Y, Cu-Uvin S, Mayer KH, Wright PF, Kappes JC, Ochsenbauer C, Wira CR: Selective impact of HIV disease progression on the innate immune system in the human female reproductive tract. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:e38100.
  • 49
    McKinnon LR, Kaul R: Quality and quantity: mucosal CD4+ T cells and HIV susceptibility. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2012; 7:195202.
  • 50
    Li Q, Duan L, Estes JD, Ma ZM, Rourke T, Wang Y, Reilly C, Carlis J, Miller CJ, Haase AT: Peak SIV replication in resting memory CD4+ T cells depletes gut lamina propria CD4+ T cells. Nature 2005; 434:11481152.
  • 51
    Zhang Z, Schuler T, Zupancic M, Wietgrefe S, Staskus KA, Reimann KA, Reinhart TA, Rogan M, Cavert W, Miller CJ, Veazey RS, Notermans D, Little S, Danner SA, Richman DD, Havlir D, Wong J, Jordan HL, Schacker TW, Racz P, Tenner-Racz K, Letvin NL, Wolinsky S, Haase AT: Sexual transmission and propagation of SIV and HIV in resting and activated CD4+ T cells. Science 1999; 286:13531357.
  • 52
    McKinnon LR, Nyanga B, Chege D, Izulla P, Kimani M, Huibner S, Gelmon L, Block KE, Cicala C, Anzala AO, Arthos J, Kimani J, Kaul R: Characterization of a human cervical CD4+ T cell subset coexpressing multiple markers of HIV susceptibility. J Immunol 2011; 187:60326042.
  • 53
    Meditz AL, Moreau KL, MaWhinney S, Gozansky WS, Melander K, Kohrt WM, Wierman ME, Connick E: CCR5 expression is elevated on endocervical CD4+ T cells in healthy postmenopausal women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 59:221228.
  • 54
    Starkey PM, Clover LM, Rees MCP: Variation during the menstrual cycle of immune cell populations in human endometrium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 39:203207.
  • 55
    Collins KB, Patterson BK, Naus GJ, Landers DV, Gupta P: Development of an in vitro organ culture model to study transmission of HIV-1 in the female genital tract. Nat Med 2000; 6:475479.
  • 56
    Cummins Jr JE, Guarner J, Flowers L, Guenthner PC, Bartlett J, Morken T, Grohskopf LA, Paxton L, Dezzutti CS: Preclinical testing of candidate topical microbicides for anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 activity and tissue toxicity in a human cervical explant culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51:17701779.
  • 57
    Greenhead P, Hayes P, Watts PS, Laing KG, Griffin GE, Shattock RJ: Parameters of human immunodeficiency virus infection of human cervical tissue and inhibition by vaginal virucides. J Virol 2000; 74:55775586.
  • 58
    Sharova N, Swingler C, Sharkey M, Stevenson M: Macrophages archive HIV-1 virions for dissemination in trans. EMBO J 2005; 24:24812489.
  • 59
    Altfeld M, Fadda L, Frleta D, Bhardwaj N: DCs and NK cells: critical effectors in the immune response to HIV-1. Nat Rev Immunol 2011; 11:176186.
  • 60
    Liu K, Victora GD, Schwickert TA, Guermonprez P, Meredith MM, Yao K, Chu FF, Randolph GJ, Rudensky AY, Nussenzweig M: In vivo analysis of dendritic cell development and homeostasis. Science 2009; 324:392397.
  • 61
    Randolph GJ, Ochando J, Partida-Sanchez S: Migration of dendritic cell subsets and their precursors. Annu Rev Immunol 2008; 26:293316.
  • 62
    Wu L, KewalRamani VN: Dendritic-cell interactions with HIV: infection and viral dissemination. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6:859868.
  • 63
    Banchereau J, Steinman RM: Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 1998; 392:245252.
  • 64
    Steinman RM, Hemmi H: Dendritic cells: translating innate to adaptive immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2006; 311:1758.
  • 65
    Iijima N, Linehan MM, Saeland S, Iwasaki A: Vaginal epithelial dendritic cells renew from bone marrow precursors. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2007; 104:1906119066.
  • 66
    Iijima N, Linehan MM, Zamora M, Butkus D, Dunn R, Kehry MR, Laufer TM, Iwasaki A: Dendritic cells and B cells maximize mucosal Th1 memory response to herpes simplex virus. J Exp Med 2008; 205:30413052.
  • 67
    Schulke L, Manconi F, Markham R, Fraser IS: Endometrial dendritic cell populations during the normal menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:15741580.
  • 68
    Cunningham AL, Donaghy H, Harman AN, Kim M, Turville SG: Manipulation of dendritic cell function by viruses. Curr Opin Microbiol 2010; 13:524529.
  • 69
    Lambotin M, Raghuraman S, Stoll-Keller F, Baumert TF, Barth H: A look behind closed doors: interaction of persistent viruses with dendritic cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010; 8:350360.
  • 70
    Chehimi J, Luo Q, Azzoni L, Shawver L, Ngoubilly N, June R, Jerandi G, Farabaugh M, Montaner LJ: HIV-1 transmission and cytokine-induced expression of DC-SIGN in human monocyte-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 2003; 74:757763.
  • 71
    Gringhuis SI, van der Vlist M, van den Berg LM, den Dunnen J, Litjens M, Geijtenbeek TBH: HIV-1 exploits innate signaling by TLR8 and DC-SIGN for productive infection of dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 2010; 11:419426.
  • 72
    Rieger L, Honig A, Sütterlin M, Kapp M, Dietl J, Ruck P, Kämmerer U: Antigen-presenting cells in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle compared to early pregnancy. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2004; 11:488493.
  • 73
    Ochiel DO, Ochsenbauer C, Kappes JC, Ghosh M, Fahey JV, Wira CR: Uterine epithelial cell regulation of DC-SIGN expression inhibits transmitted/founder HIV-1 trans infection by immature dendritic cells. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e14306.
  • 74
    Ochiel DO, Ghosh M, Fahey JV, Guyre PM, Wira CR: Human uterine epithelial cell secretions regulate dendritic cell differentiation and responses to TLR ligands. J Leukoc Biol 2010; 88:435444.
  • 75
    Rodriguez-Garcia M, Climent N, Oliva H, Casanova V, Franco R, Leon A, Gatell JM, Garcia F, Gallart T: Increased alpha-defensins 1–3 production by dendritic cells in HIV-infected individuals is associated with slower disease progression. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e9436.
  • 76
    Escribese MM, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Sperling R, Engel SM, Gallart T, Moran TM: Alpha-defensins 1–3 release by dendritic cells is reduced by estrogen. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011; 9:118.
  • 77
    Rodriguez-Garcia M, Oliva H, Climent N, Garcia F, Gatell JM, Gallart T: Human immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells produce and secrete alpha-defensins 1–3. J Leukoc Biol 2007; 82:11431146.
  • 78
    de Witte L, Nabatov A, Pion M, Fluitsma D, de Jong MA, de Gruijl T, Piguet V, van Kooyk Y, Geijtenbeek TB: Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells. Nat Med 2007; 13:367371.
  • 79
    Hladik F, Sakchalathorn P, Ballweber L, Lentz G, Fialkow M, Eschenbach D, McElrath MJ: Initial events in establishing vaginal entry and infection by human immunodeficiency virus type-1. Immunity 2007; 26:257270.
  • 80
    Ballweber L, Robinson B, Kreger A, Fialkow M, Lentz G, McElrath MJ, Hladik F: Vaginal langerhans cells nonproductively transporting HIV-1 mediate infection of T cells. J Virol 2011; 85:1344313447.
  • 81
    Chacko L, Ford N, Sbaiti M, Siddiqui R: Adherence to HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in victims of sexual assault: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88:335341.
  • 82
    Speight CG, Klufio A, Kilonzo SN, Mbugua C, Kuria E, Bunn JE, Taegtmeyer M: Piloting post-exposure prophylaxis in Kenya raises specific concerns for the management of childhood rape. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2006; 100:1418.
  • 83
    Bakhru A, Mallinger JB, Fox MC: Postexposure prophylaxis for victims of sexual assault: treatments and attitudes of emergency department physicians. Contraception 2010; 82:168173.
  • 84
    Rose VL: ACOG issues report on sexual assault. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Am Fam Physician 1998; 57:11441145.
  • 85
    CDC: Sexual assault and STDs. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010.
  • 86
    McLean I, Roberts SA, White C, Paul S: Female genital injuries resulting from consensual and non-consensual vaginal intercourse. Forensic Sci Int 2011; 204:2733.
  • 87
    Geist RF: Sexually related trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1988; 6:439466.
  • 88
    Lauber AA, Souma ML: Use of toluidine blue for documentation of traumatic intercourse. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60:644648.
  • 89
    Sommers MS: Defining patterns of genital injury from sexual assault: a review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007; 8:270280.
  • 90
    Stoecklein VM, Osuka A, Lederer JA: Trauma equals danger–damage control by the immune system. J Leukoc Biol 2012; 92:539551.
  • 91
    McCann J, Miyamoto S, Boyle C, Rogers K: Healing of nonhymenal genital injuries in prepubertal and adolescent girls: a descriptive study. Pediatrics 2007; 120:10001011.
  • 92
    Ramin SM, Satin AJ, Stone Jr IC, Wendel Jr GD: Sexual assault in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:860864.
  • 93
    Sugar NF, Fine DN, Eckert LO: Physical injury after sexual assault: findings of a large case series. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:7176.
  • 94
    Sommers MS, Zink T, Baker RB, Fargo JD, Porter J, Weybright D, Schafer JC: The effects of age and ethnicity on physical injury from rape. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006; 35:199207.
  • 95
    Dave AJ, Sethi A, Morrone A: Female genital mutilation: what every American dermatologist needs to know. Dermatol Clin 2011; 29:103109.
  • 96
    Morrone A, Hercogova J, Lotti T: Stop female genital mutilation: appeal to the international dermatologic community. Int J Dermatol 2002; 41:253263.