Original Article
You have free access to this content
The case for retaining severe perineal tears as an indicator of the quality of obstetric care
Article first published online: 1 NOV 2012
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12014
© 2012 The Author ANZJOG © 2012 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Issue

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume 53, Issue 1, pages 3–8, February 2013
Additional Information
How to Cite
Baghurst, P. A. (2013), The case for retaining severe perineal tears as an indicator of the quality of obstetric care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 53: 3–8. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12014
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 FEB 2013
- Article first published online: 1 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 18 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Received: 11 JUL 2012
References
- 1, , et al. Prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi-country study. BJOG 2012; 119: 340–347.
- 2, , . Benchmarking Maternity Care 2006–2008. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Women's Hospitals Australasia, 2009.
- 3, , et al. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1905–1911.
- 4Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Towards National Indicators of Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Cat No. HSE 75 Canberra, ACT: AIHW, 2009.
- 5, , et al. Measures of Patient Safety Based on Hospital Administrative Data – The Patient Safety Indicators. Technical Review 5. AHRQ Publication No. 02-0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2002; 131–133.
- 6Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Good Practice No. 7: Maternity Dashboard: Clinical Performance and Governance Score Card. January 2008. [Accessed 9 July 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/GoodPractice7MaternityDashboard2008.pdf.
- 7. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15 (6): 523–530.
- 8, , et al. Validation of the 1994 South Australian Perinatal Data Collection Form. Adelaide, SA: Pregnancy Outcome Unit, Department of Human Services, 2001.
- 9, , . Using control charts to monitor quality of hospital care with administrative data. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20 (1): 31–39.
- 10, . Risk models for benchmarking severe perineal tears during vaginal childbirth: a cross-sectional study of public hospitals in South Australia, 2002–2008. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26: 430–437.
- 11Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Green-top Guideline No. 29. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. 2007. [Accessed 9 July 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/GTG2911022011.pdf.
- 12, , , . An Australian prospective cohort study of risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth. Midwifery 2007; 23: 196–203.
- 13, , , . Perineal length: norms in gravid women in the first stage of labour. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20: 1361–1364.
- 14, . Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy–a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136 (2): 178–183.
- 15
- 16, , , . Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15: 7–13.
- 17, , ; for the ANZICS Paediatric Study Group. The application of risk adjusted control charts using PIM2 for monitoring paediatric intensive care performance in Australia and New Zealand. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34(7): 281–288.
- 18, , . Report of the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry2010, 2012; 42-53. [Accessed 9 July 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.anzics.com.au/downloads/doc_download/567-2010-anzpic-registry-annual-report.
- 19
- 20, , , . Monitoring obstetricians' performance with statistical process control charts. BJOG 2007; 114: 614–618.
- 21, , et al. Monitoring healthcare quality in an obstetrics and gynaecology department using a CUSUM chart. BJOG 2010; 117: 1225–1235.
- 22Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care. Putting the Framework into action: Getting started [Accessed 11 April 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ASQFHC-Guide-Healthcare-team.pdf.
- 23, , et al. Using the quality improvement cycle on clinical indicators – improve or remove? Med J Aust 2010; 193: S104–S106.

1479-828X/asset/AJO_left.gif?v=1&s=1cf23de4573c7ff3f10125e96c4fcf94fe658c2e)
1479-828X/asset/AJO_right.gif?v=1&s=6cd89ba730bf466211e602e35ffd624293c2a7f2)