The author gratefully acknowledges advice from colleagues at the Australian Catholic University, especially Shurlee Swain, Nell Musgrove and Maggie Nolan.
The Curious Case of Mervyn Eades: National Service, Discrimination and Aboriginal People
Article first published online: 14 MAR 2013
© 2013 The Author. Australian Journal of Politics and History © 2013 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics, School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Australian Journal of Politics & History
Volume 59, Issue 1, pages 63–79, March 2013
How to Cite
Riseman, N. (2013), The Curious Case of Mervyn Eades: National Service, Discrimination and Aboriginal People. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59: 63–79. doi: 10.1111/ajph.12004
- Issue published online: 14 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 14 MAR 2013
In 1971, an Aboriginal man named Mervyn Eades was convicted for failing to register for national service. The magistrate determined that while Eades was indeed Aboriginal under Western Australian law, under the National Service Act he was not. Scrutiny of Eades’ case exposes the interconnected issues of Aboriginality, racial discrimination, assimilation, federalism and conscription in the period between the 1967 Referendum and the 1972 election. Eades’ conviction represented a unique junction of these seemingly disparate political issues which gradually converged. Analysis of Eades’ case and the wider issue of Aboriginal people and national service highlights ongoing legislative discrimination in the immediate post-Referendum period, the problematic status of concurrent Aboriginal affairs powers and the McMahon Liberal government's determination — ultimately unsuccessfully — to avoid conflation of conscription and race politics.