The author wishes to thank Greg Dezman, Ben Franklin, David Kemp and Nicholas Reece for agreeing to be interviewed for this paper. The author would also like to thank Wayne Errington and the three anonymous referees for their helpful advice.
Explaining the (Lack of) Use of Radical Candidate Selection Methods by Australia's Major Parties
Article first published online: 14 MAR 2013
© 2013 The Author. Australian Journal of Politics and History © 2013 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics, School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Australian Journal of Politics & History
Volume 59, Issue 1, pages 113–126, March 2013
How to Cite
Miragliotta, N. (2013), Explaining the (Lack of) Use of Radical Candidate Selection Methods by Australia's Major Parties. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59: 113–126. doi: 10.1111/ajph.12007
- Issue published online: 14 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 14 MAR 2013
Australia's main parties have experienced rapid deterioration in levels of membership but most have been reluctant to follow the lead of many of their counterparts in Western Europe and embrace more radical, inclusive pre-selection formats to arrest declining numbers. This paper offers a partial explanation of why the Liberal and Labor parties have been disinclined to look to reforming candidate selection as a strategy to combat their shrinking rank-and-file membership. It argues that compulsory voting in conjunction with high levels of party identification has reduced the imperative for Australia's major parties to resort to candidate selection reform as a device to stabilise their voter base. This study underscores the important role of the institutional setting in affecting the incentives for parties to use pre-selection reform to combat a shrinking membership base.