SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arceneaux, Kevin. 2008. “Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?Political Behavior 30: 13960.
  • Boudreau, Cheryl. 2009. “Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?Journal of Politics 71(3): 96476.
  • Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan, and Caroline J. Tolbert, eds. 1998. Citizens as Legislators. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Bullock, John. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 496515.
  • California Fair Political Practices Commission. 2010. Big Money Talks. Sacramento, CA: Fair Political Practices Commission.
  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
  • Chaiken, Shelley, and Durairaj Maheswaran. 1994. “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 46073.
  • Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101(4): 63755.
  • Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2010. “Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 66380.
  • Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2011. “Public-Elite Interactions.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, ed. Robert Y. Shapiro and Larry R. Jacobs. New York: Oxford University Press, 170–88.
  • Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 80822.
  • Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Druckman, James N. 2001. “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?Journal of Politics 63(4): 104166.
    Direct Link:
  • Druckman, James N., and Thomas J. Leeper. 2012a. “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 87596.
  • Druckman, James N., and Thomas J. Leeper. 2012b. “Is Public Opinion Stable? Resolving the Micro-Macro Disconnect in Studies of Public Opinion.” Daedalus 141: 5068.
  • Eagly, Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
  • Gaines, Brian J., James H. Kuklinski, and Paul J. Quirk. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis 15(1): 120.
  • Kam, Cindy D. 2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences.” Political Behavior 27(2): 16382.
  • Kruglanski, Arie W., and Erik P. Thompson. 1999. “Persuasion by a Single Route: A View from the Unimodel.” Psychological Inquiry 10(2): 83109.
  • Kunda, Ziva. 1999. Social Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lavine, Howard, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan. 2000. “On the Relationship between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing.” Political Psychology 21(1): 81106.
  • Lavine, Howard G., Christopher D. Johnston, and Marco R. Steenbergen. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. 2000. “Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason, ed. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183213.
  • Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88(1): 6376.
  • Lupia, Arthur, and John G. Matsusaka. 2004. “Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 46382.
  • Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nicholson, Stephen P. 2011. “Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence.” Journal of Politics 73(4): 116577.
  • Nicholson, Stephen P. 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 5266.
  • Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123205.
  • Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1996. Attitudes and Persuasion. New York: Westview Press.
  • Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 47296.
  • Riggle, Ellen D., Victor C. Ottati, Robert S. Wyer, James Kuklinski, and Norbert Schwarz. 1992. “Bases of Political Judgments: The Role of Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Information.” Political Behavior 14: 6787.
  • Slothuus, Rune, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” Journal of Politics 72(3): 63045.
  • Sniderman, Paul M., and John G. Bullock. 2004. “A Consistency Theory of Public Opinion and Political Choice: The Hypothesis of Menu Dependence.” In Studies in Public Opinion, ed. Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 33757.
  • Sniderman, Paul M., and Edward H. Stiglitz. 2012. The Reputational Premium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 75569.
  • Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.