SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    van der Vyver M, Halpern S, Joseph G. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 89: 45965.
  • 2
    Boutros A, Blary S, Bronchard R, Bonnet F. Comparison of intermittent epidural bolus, continuous epidural infusion and patient controlled-epidural analgesia during labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1999; 8: 23641.
  • 3
    D'Angelo R. New techniques for labor analgesia: PCEA and CSE. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 46: 62332.
  • 4
    Ferrante FM, Rosinia FA, Gordon C, Datta S. The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1994; 79: 804.
  • 5
    Missant C, Teunkenst A, Vandermeersch E, Van de Velde M. Patient controlled epidural analgesia following combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: the effects of adding a continuous epidural infusion. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2005; 33: 4526.
  • 6
    Bremerich DH, Waibel HJ, Mierdl S, et al. Comparison of continuous background infusion plus demand dose and demand-only parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for labor and delivery. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2005; 14: 11420.
  • 7
    Petry J, Vercauteren M, Van Mol I, Van Houwe P, Adriaensen HA. Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial? Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica 2000; 51: 1636.
  • 8
    Boselli E, Debon R, Cimino Y, Rimmele T, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D. Background infusion is not beneficial during labor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 [mu]g/ml sufentanil. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 96872.
  • 9
    Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Medical Journal 2006; 47: 9516.
  • 10
    Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo CE. Comparison of computer integrated patient controlled epidural analgesia vs. conventional patient controlled epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 33944.
  • 11
    Sng BL, Sia AT, Lim Y, Woo D, Ocampo C. Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia with a basal infusion for labour and delivery. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2009; 37: 4653.
  • 12
    Chua SMH, Sia ATH. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2004; 51: 5815.
  • 13
    Fettes PDW, Moore CS, Whiteside JB, McLeod GA, Wildsmith JAW. Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006; 97: 35964.
  • 14
    Lim Y, Sia ATH, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2005; 14: 3059.
  • 15
    Hogan Q. Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2002; 27: 1506.
  • 16
    Kaynar AM, Shankar KB. Epidural infusion: continuous or bolus? Anesthesia and Analgesia 1999; 89: 534.
  • 17
    Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2006; 102: 9049.
  • 18
    Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2007; 104: 6738.