Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis
Version of Record online: 31 DEC 2012
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Volume 127, Issue 5, pages 351–359, May 2013
How to Cite
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis. Acta Neurol Scand: DOI: 10.1111/ane.12065. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S., , , , , .
- Issue online: 13 APR 2013
- Version of Record online: 31 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 NOV 2012
- MR CLEAN. Grant Numbers: NHS2008030, NTR1804
Figure S1. Outcome distributions of the model at six months for conservative treatment and intravenous thrombolysis and reported distributions of NINDS trial.
Table S1. Overview of recanalization rates in randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Table S2. Outcome distribution at six months for all treatment strategies.
Appendix S1. Additional explanation of calculations incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.