Conflict of interest The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.
Main Research Article
Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia – effect on subsequent trial of labor
Article first published online: 5 NOV 2012
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12023
© 2012 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica© 2012 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Additional Information
How to Cite
ABILDGAARD, H., INGERSLEV, M. D., NICKELSEN, C. and SECHER, N. J. (2013), Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia – effect on subsequent trial of labor. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 92: 193–197. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12023
Please cite this article as: Abildgaard H, Ingerslev MD, Nickelsen C, Secher NJ. Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia – effect on subsequent trial of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91: DOI:10.1111/aogs.12023.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 5 NOV 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 1 OCT 2012 07:44PM EST
- Received: 1 April 2012 Accepted: 19 September 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Cervical dilation;
- cesarean section;
- dystocia;
- trial of labor;
- vaginal birth
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the effect of cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section due to dystocia and success in a subsequent pregnancy of attempted vaginal delivery. Design. Retrospective study. Setting. University hospital in Copenhagen capital area. Population. All women with a prior cesarean section due to dystocia who had undergone a subsequent pregnancy with a singleton delivery during 2006–2010. Methods. Medical records were reviewed for prior vaginal birth, cervical dilation reached before cesarean section and induction of labor, gestational age, use of oxytocin, epidural anesthesia and mode of birth was collected. Results. A total of 889 women were included; 373 had had a trial of labor. The success rate for vaginal birth among women with prior cesarean section for dystocia at 4–8 cm dilation was 39%, but 59% for women in whom prior cesarean section had been done at a fully or almost fully dilated cervix (9–10 cm) (p < 0.001). Among the women with a previous vaginal delivery prior to their cesarean section, the success rate for vaginal birth was 76.2%, in contrast to 48.9% in the group without a previous vaginal delivery (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Women who had a trial of labor after a prior cesarean section for dystocia done late in labor and women with a vaginal delivery prior to their cesarean section had a greater chance of a successful vaginal birth during a subsequent delivery.

1600-0412/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=57812cd8f1436c028053cdb5857fe88ef5c24c7e)
