PACCRETA: Clinical situations at high risk of Placenta ACCRETA/Percreta: impact of diagnostic methods and management on maternal morbidity

Authors

  • Gilles Kayem,

    Corresponding author
    1. INSERM Unit 953, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women's and Children's Health, Hospital Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Louis Mourier, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine (HUPNVS), Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP), Paris Diderot University, Paris
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Catherine Deneux-Tharaux,

    1. INSERM Unit 953, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women's and Children's Health, Hospital Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Loic Sentilhes,

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
    Search for more papers by this author
  • The PACCRETA group

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Elie Azria, Gaël Beucher, Marie Pierre Bonnet, Bernard Branger, Marie Hélène Bouvier Colle, Lionel Carbillon, Catherine Crenn Hébert, Corinne Dupont, Jeanne Fresson, Cyril Huissoud, Bruno Langer, Pierre Raynal, René Charles Rudigoz, Françoise Vendittelli, Norbert Winer, Olivier Morel, Franck Perrotin.

  • The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Correspondence

Gilles Kayem, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Louis Mourier, APHP, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. E-mail: gkayem@gmail.com

Abstract

Background

No population-based study has assessed the prevalence of placenta accreta, the predictive value of prenatal diagnostic examinations, the maternal morbidity associated with its management, or its psychological effects. Moreover, the technical resources necessary for the safest delivery of women at risk have not been clearly identified.

Objectives

The primary objectives are to identify individual risk factors, as well as factors associated with types of management and with the healthcare facilities for postpartum hemorrhage. Secondary objectives are to (i) determine the prevalence of placenta accreta among women at risk; (ii) assess the predictive value of ultrasound and MRI for the diagnosis of placenta accreta in this population; (iii) evaluate psychological impact and physical complications; and (iv) report maternal physical complications during the year after delivery.

Design

Population-based prospective observational study of pregnant women with a placenta inserted at a uterine scar.

Setting

A total of 182 centers in eight French regions, with 270 000 deliveries annually.

Methods

We expect to include 620 women at risk of placenta accreta in two years, of whom approximately 120 (20%) will have placenta accreta.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome measure is severe maternal hemorrhage; secondary outcome measures are maternal morbidity and deaths, predictive value of ultrasound and MRI, and psychological evaluations at 6 and 12 months.

Conclusion

This study will be the first prospective population-based study to include women at risk of placenta accreta and to investigate incidence, prenatal detection, type of management, morbidity and maternal psychological consequences.

Ancillary