Commentary: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Article first published online: 16 OCT 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Volume 36, Issue 10, pages 988–989, November 2012
How to Cite
Friedman, L. S. (2012), Commentary: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 36: 988–989. doi: 10.1111/apt.12064
- Issue published online: 16 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 16 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Received: 11 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 11 SEP 2012
In a well-designed and well-executed randomised, controlled trial in five Italian centres, Repici and colleagues showed that 2 L of a new iso-osmotic sulphate-free bowel preparation of polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone (PEG-CS), in combination with 10–20 mg of bisacodyl, was slightly more effective than 2 L of PEG-ascorbate (PEG-ASC) plus 1 L of additional water. Two litres of PEG-ASC (plus 1 L of water) has been shown to be as effective as standard 4-L PEG regimens. The preparations were taken the evening before outpatient colonoscopy the following morning, and were comparable in tolerability and compliance. Adenoma detection rates were not reported.
The authors did not use a split regimen (half the evening before and half the morning of colonoscopy), which is clearly superior to evening-before administration with standard 4-L PEG preparations. They note that split regimens generally are not recommended with low-volume PEG preparations and are recommended for high-volume PEG preparations primarily to enhance patient tolerability.
In fact, recent randomised, controlled trials have shown that the tolerability of low-volume preparations is also improved by split dosing,[3, 4] with slightly more frequent preparations of excellent quality for PEG-sulphate than for PEG-ascorbate. Moreover, as the authors note, split-dose PEG-ASC has resulted in better cleansing than single-dose 2-L PEG plus bisacodyl, at least for afternoon colonoscopies. And in inpatients undergoing morning colonoscopies, split-dose PEG-ASC was as effective as and better tolerated than split-dose 4-L PEG with electrolytes.
Arguments against split-dosing of low-volume preparations include potential interference with American Society of Anaesthesiology fasting guidelines, the possible need for a bathroom stop during the trip from home to the endoscopy centre, and potentially reduced compliance with the second dose so early in the morning; none of these concerns seems insurmountable. The authors also note concern about ischaemic colitis with regimens that include bisacodyl.
Clearly, PEG-CS is another option for colonoscopy preparation, but more comparative studies are needed, not only of the agents used in various regimens but also of the timing of their administration.
Declaration of personal interests: L. S. Friedman has received royalties from Elsevier, McGraw-Hill and UpToDate, and honoraria from Digestive Disease Week Council and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Declaration of funding interests: None.
- 6Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 883–93., , , et al.Direct Link: