SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adam, E., Mutanga, O. & Rugege, D. 2010. Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing for identification and mapping of wetland vegetation: a review. Wetlands Ecology and Management 18: 281296.
  • Andrew, M. & Ustin, S. 2009. Habitat suitability modelling of an invasive plant with advanced remote sensing data. Diversity and Distributions 15: 627640.
  • Ashraf, S., Brabyn, L., Hicks, B.J. & Collier, K. 2010. Satellite remote sensing for mapping vegetation in New Zealand freshwater environments: a review. New Zealand Geographer 66: 3343.
  • Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Andersson, B., Krattunen, K., Riis, T. & Toivonen, H. 2001. Macrophytes. In: Skriver, J. (ed.) Biological monitoring in Nordic rivers and lakes, pp. 5360. TeamNord, Copenhagen, DK.
  • Blaschke, T. & Strobl, J. 2001. What's wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS. GIS – Zeitschrift für Geoinformationssysteme 14: 1217.
  • Bryson, M., Reid, A., Ramos, F. & Sukkarieh, S. 2010. Airborne vision-based mapping and classification of large farmland environments. Journal of Field Robotics 27: 632655.
  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2007. Water quality: Guidance standard for the surveying of macrophytes in lakes, EN 15460:2007, 17 Oct 2007.
  • Colwell, R. (ed.) 1960. Manual of photographic interpretation, 1st ed. American Society of Photogrammetry, Washington, DC.
  • Congalton, R.G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37: 3546.
  • Dudley, B., Dunbar, M., Penning, E., Kolada, A., Hellsten, S., Oggioni, A., Bertrin, V., Ecke, F. & Søndergaard, M. 2013. Measurements of uncertainty in macrophyte metrics used to assess European lake water quality. Hydrobiologia 704: 179191.
  • Dunford, R., Michel, K., Gagnage, M., Piegay, H. & Tremelo, M.L. 2009. Potential and constraints of unmanned aerial vehicle technology for the characterization of Mediterranean riparian forest. International Journal of Remote Sensing 30: 49154935.
  • Ecke, F. 2006. Vattenvegetation som indikator för vattenkvalitet och sjökaraktär: Baserad på förändringar i vattenkemi och vegetation i svenska sjöar 1929–2005. Luleå University of Technology [report no. 2006:15], Luleå, SE.
  • Edwards, R.W. & Brown, M.W. 1960. An aerial photographic method for studying the distribution of aquatic macrophytes in shallow waters. Journal of Ecology 48: 161163.
  • EU (European Union). 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities 43: 172. L-327, 22 Dec 2000.
  • Goetz, S.J. 2006. Remote sensing of riparian buffers: past progress and future prospects. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42: 133143.
  • Gross, M.F., Hardisky, M.A., Klemas, V. & Wolf, P.L. 1987. Quantification of biomass of the marsh grass Spartina alterniflora Loisel using Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 53: 15771583.
  • Hallingbäck, T., Hedenäs, L. & Weibull, H. 2006. Ny checklista för Sveriges mossor [New checklist for Swedish mosses]. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 100: 96148.
  • Hamada, Y., Stow, D.A., Coulter, L.L., Jafolla, J.C. & Hendricks, L.W. 2007. Detecting Tamarisk species (Tamarix spp.) in riparian habitats of Southern California using high spatial resolution hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 109: 237248.
  • Howland, W.G. 1980. Multispectral aerial photography for wetland vegetation mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 46: 8799.
  • Karlsson, T. 1997. The vascular plants of Sweden: a checklist. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 91: 241560.
  • Laliberte, A.S. & Rango, A. 2009. Texture and scale in object-based analysis of subdecimeter resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47: 761770.
  • Laliberte, A.S. & Rango, A. 2011. Image processing and classification procedures for analysis of sub-decimeter imagery acquired with an unmanned aircraft over arid rangelands. GIScience & Remote Sensing 48: 423.
  • Leka, J. & Kanninen, A. 2003. Field surveys of aquatic macrophytes as a tool for monitoring and assessing the ecological status of the boreal lakes. In: Ruoppa, M., Heinonen, P., Pilke, A., Rekolainen, S., Toivonen, H. & Vuorista, H. (eds.) How to assess and monitor ecological quality in freshwaters, pp. 127130. TemaNord, Copenhagen, DK.
  • Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W. & Chipman, J.W. 2008. Remote sensing and image interpretation, 6th ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
  • Lohammar, G. 1938. Wasserchemie und höhere Vegetation Schwedischer Seen. PhD Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE.
  • Lomax, A., Corso, W. & Etro, J. 2005. Employing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as an element of the Integrated Ocean Observing System. Proceedings of the Marine Technology Society (MTS)/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) conference OCEANS 2005, Washington, DC.
  • Marshall, T.R. & Lee, P.F. 1994. Mapping aquatic macrophytes through digital image analysis of aerial photographs: an assessment. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 32: 6166.
  • Midwood, J.D. & Chow-Fraser, P. 2010. Mapping floating and emergent aquatic vegetation in coastal wetlands of Eastern Georgian Bay, Lake Huron, Canada. Wetlands 30: 11411152.
  • Muller, E. 1997. Mapping riparian vegetation along rivers: old concepts and new methods. Aquatic Botany 58: 411437.
  • O'Hare, J.M., O'Hare, M.T., Gurnell, A.M., Scarlett, P.M., Liffen, T.O.M. & McDonald, C. 2011. Influence of an ecosystem engineer, the emergent macrophyte Sparganium erectum, on seed trapping in lowland rivers and consequences for landform colonisation. Freshwater Biology 57: 104115.
  • Penning, W.E., Mjelde, M., Dudley, B., Hellsten, S., Hanganu, J., Kolada, A., van den Berg, M., Poikane, S., Phillips, G., Willby, N. & Ecke, F. 2008a. Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes. Aquatic Ecology 42: 237251.
  • Penning, W.E., Dudley, B., Mjelde, M., Hellsten, S., Hanganu, J., Kolada, A., van den Berg, M., Poikane, S., Phillips, G., Willby, N. & Ecke, F. 2008b. Using aquatic macrophyte community indices to define the ecological status of European lakes. Aquatic Ecology 42: 253264.
  • Petersen, S.L., Stringham, T.K. & Laliberte, A.S. 2005. Classification of willow species using large-scale aerial photography. Rangeland Ecology & Management 58: 582587.
  • Pieczynska, E. 1993. Detritus and nutrient dynamics in the shore zone of lakes: a review. Hydrobiologia 251: 4958.
  • Rango, A., Laliberte, A., Herrick, J.E., Winters, C., Havstad, K., Steele, C. & Browning, D. 2009. Unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing for rangeland assessment, monitoring, and management. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 3: 115.
  • Richards, J.A. 2013. Remote sensing digital image analysis, 5th ed. Springer, Berlin, DE.
  • Silva, T.S.F., Costa, M.P.F., Melack, J.M. & Novo, E. 2008. Remote sensing of aquatic vegetation: theory and applications. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 140: 131145.
  • Sjörs, H. 1999. The background: geology, climate and zonation. In: Rydin, H., Snoeijs, P. & Diekmann, M. (eds.) Swedish plant geography, 1st ed, pp. 514. Svenska Växtgeografiska Sällskapet, Uppsala, SE.
  • Spears, B.M., Gunn, I.D.M., Carvalho, L., Winfield, I.J., Dudley, B., Murphy, K. & May, L. 2009. An evaluation of methods for sampling macrophyte maximum colonisation depth in Loch Leven, Scotland. Aquatic Botany 91: 7581.
  • Staniszewski, R., Szoszkiewicz, K., Zbierska, J., Lesny, J., Jusik, S. & Clarke, R.T. 2006. Assessment of sources of uncertainty in macrophyte surveys and the consequences for river classification. Hydrobiologia 566: 235246.
  • Stehman, S.V. 2009. Sampling designs for accuracy assessment of land cover. International Journal of Remote Sensing 30: 52435272.
  • Strayer, D. 2010. Ecology of freshwater shore zones. Aquatic Sciences 72: 127163.
  • Tabacchi, E., Correll, D.L., Hauer, R., Pinay, G., Planty-Tabacchi, A.M. & Wissmar, R.C. 1998. Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape. Freshwater Biology 40: 497516.
  • Taylor, B., Bil, C. & Watkins, S. 2003. Horizon sensing attitude stabilisation: A VMC Autopilot. Proceedings of the 18th International UAV Systems Conference, Bristol, UK.
  • Tempfli, K., Kerle, N., Huurneman, G. & Janssen, L. (eds.) 2009. Principles of remote sensing, 4th ed. The International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, NL.
  • Tian, Y.Q., Yu, Q., Zimmerman, M.J., Flint, S. & Waldron, M.C. 2010. Differentiating aquatic plant communities in a eutrophic river using hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing. Freshwater Biology 55: 16581673.
  • Valta-Hulkkonen, K., Pellikka, P., Tanskanen, H., Ustinov, A. & Sandman, A. 2003a. Digital false colour aerial photographs for discrimination of aquatic macrophyte species. Aquatic Botany 75: 7188.
  • Valta-Hulkkonen, K., Partanen, S. & Kanninen, A. 2003b. Remote sensing as a tool in the aquatic macrophyte mapping of a eutrophic lake: a comparison between visual interpretation and spectral sorting. Proceedings of the 9th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, pp. 7990, Espoo, FI.
  • Vestermark, L. & Persson, B.-G. 2007. Metallers förekomst i Bolidenområdets vattenmiljöer. Skellefteå kommun [report no. 2007/1], Skellefteå, SE.
  • Waaranperä, S. 2009. Miljörapport 2008 LKAB Kiruna. Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Aktiebolag (LKAB) [report no. 09-702], Kiruna, SE.
  • Wang, C., Menenti, M., Stoll, M.P., Belluco, E. & Marani, M. 2007. Mapping mixed vegetation communities in salt marshes using airborne spectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment 107: 559570.
  • Yang, C.H. & Everitt, J.H. 2010. Mapping three invasive weeds using airborne hyperspectral imagery. Ecological Informatics 5: 429439.