Sarah K. Tighe and Sarah A. Reading are co-first authors.
Total white matter hyperintensity volume in bipolar disorder patients and their healthy relatives
Version of Record online: 21 NOV 2012
© 2012 John Wiley and Sons A/S
Volume 14, Issue 8, pages 888–893, December 2012
How to Cite
Tighe, S. K., Reading, S. A., Rivkin, P., Caffo, B., Schweizer, B., Pearlson, G., Potash, J. B., DePaulo, J. R. and Bassett, S. S. (2012), Total white matter hyperintensity volume in bipolar disorder patients and their healthy relatives. Bipolar Disorders, 14: 888–893. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12019
The results of this study were presented in poster format at the 2012 Society of Biological Psychiatry Conference, May 3–5, 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Issue online: 21 NOV 2012
- Version of Record online: 21 NOV 2012
- Received 27 October 2011, revised and accepted for publication 6 July 2012
- bipolar disorder;
- illness severity;
- magnetic resonance;
- white matter hyperintensities
Tighe SK, Reading SA, Rivkin P, Caffo B, Schweizer B, Pearlson G, Potash JB, DePaulo J Raymond, Bassett SS. Total white matter hyperintensity volume in bipolar disorder patients and their healthy relatives. Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 888–893. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Objectives: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are more common in subjects with bipolar disorder (BP) than in healthy subjects (HS). Few studies have examined the effect of the diagnostic type of bipolar illness on WMH burden, and none have approached this question through a direct measurement of the volume of affected white matter in relationship to familiality. In this pilot study, we utilized a volumetric measurement of WMH to investigate the relationship between the total volume of WMH and the familiality and type of BP.
Methods: Forty-five individuals with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) with psychotic features, BP-I without psychotic features, or bipolar II disorder (BP-II), seven of their unaffected relatives, and 32 HS were recruited for participation. T-2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained on all subjects, and the total volume of all WMH for each subject was measured in cubic centimeters. The significance of difference between groups was tested using ANOVA with post-hoc adjustment for multiple comparisons. Further, we used logistic regression to test for trends between symptom load and total WMH volume.
Results: The mean total volume of WMH in BP-I patients with psychotic features was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of HS. Further, we observed a positive linear trend by familiality and type of affectedness when comparing mean total WMH volume of HS, unaffected family members, subjects with BP-II, and BP-I with and without a history of psychosis (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Based on a quantitative technique, WMH burden appears to be associated with familiality and type of BP. The significance of these findings remains to be fully elucidated.