Phylogeography of willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus) in the Arctic: taxonomic discordance as inferred from molecular data
Version of Record online: 22 MAY 2013
© 2013 The Linnean Society of London
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume 110, Issue 1, pages 77–90, September 2013
How to Cite
Höglund, J., Wang, B., Axelsson, T. and Quintela, M. (2013), Phylogeography of willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus) in the Arctic: taxonomic discordance as inferred from molecular data. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 110: 77–90. doi: 10.1111/bij.12109
- Issue online: 13 AUG 2013
- Version of Record online: 22 MAY 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 10 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 21 NOV 2012
- Swedish Research Council
Figure S1. Maximum parsimony tree of mitochondrial control region haplotypes of willow grouse (maximum parsimony tree): length (L) = 109, consistency index (CI) = 0.789 and retention index (RI) = 0.917.
Figure S2. Maximum likelihood tree of mitochondrial control region haplotypes of willow grouse.
Figure S3. Bayesian tree of mitochondrial control region haplotypes of willow grouse.
Table S1. Information about sampling location, subspecies classification of the studied individuals, and source for DNA extraction.
Table S2. List of names of the mitochondrial control region haplotypes of willow grouse.
Table S3. Single nucleotide (SNP) positions (substitutions noted in brackets in bold) and flanking regions used to design the twenty-four multiplexed primers (bold and italics indicate the codes of those that were successfully amplified). The SNP code consists of the exon name and the position of the substitution (bp).
Table S4. Summary statistics for SNPs (mean ± SE) calculated with GENALEX using geographical and taxonomic approaches, respectively: observed heterozygosity (HO), unbiased expected heterozygosity (UHE), number of alleles (A), and proportion of polymorphic loci.
Table S5. Posterior probabilities for different values of K under four approaches of STRUCTURE data analysis.
Table S6. Mean ± SD value of r after 10 runs per K with different STRUCTURE analysis approaches.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.