SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
bij12110-sup-0001-appendix_s1_table_s1-5_fig_s1_4.pdf1368K

Appendix S1. Supporting information on geometric similarity and phylogenetic comparative methods in addition to supplementary results.

Table S1. Intercepts (Int.) and slopes, as well as their confidence limits, for linear regressions across the entire neognath sample

Table S2. Intercepts (Int.) and slopes, as well as their confidence limits, for Land Bird linear regressions.

Table S3. Results of tests for phylogenetic signal and independent contrast regressions analysing the entire neognath sample when using body mass as the x-variate

Table S4. Results of independent contrast regressions analysing the entire neognath sample when using hindlimb length as the x-variate

Table S5. Comparisons of least squares linear and nonlinear regression results.

Figure S1. Comparison of left (red) and right (blue) hindlimb inertial properties for each sampled individual.

Figure S2. Comparison of the scaling of fore- and hindlimb inertial properties.

Figure S3. Comparison of the scaling of fore- and hindlimb inertial properties.

Figure S4. Comparison of linear and non-linear functions fit to the scaling relationships of hindlimb length, hindlimb COM, and hindlimb radius of gyration (with respect to body mass).

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.