Health as Normal Function: a Weak Link in Daniels's Theory of Just Health Distribution

Authors

  • Erik Krag

    Corresponding author
    • Address for correspondence: Dr Erik Krag, Saginaw Valley State University – Brown 324, 7400 Bay Road, University Center, MI 48710, USA. T: 989-964-2465 F: 989-790-7656. Email: erkrag@svsu.edu

    Search for more papers by this author

  • Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared

Abstract

Drawing on Christopher Boorse's Biostatistical Theory (BST), Norman Daniels contends that a genuine health need is one which is necessary to restore normal functioning – a supposedly objective notion which he believes can be read from the natural world without reference to potentially controversial normative categories. But despite his claims to the contrary, this conception of health harbors arbitrary evaluative judgments which make room for intractable disagreement as to which conditions should count as genuine health needs and therefore which needs should be met. I begin by offering a brief summary of Boorse's BST, the theory to which Daniels appeals for providing the conception of health as normal functioning upon which his overall distributive scheme rests. Next, I consider what I call practical objections to Daniels's use of Boorse's theory. Finally I recount Elseljin Kingma's theoretical objection to Boorse's BST and discuss its impact on Daniels's overall theory. Though I conclude that Boorse's view, so weakened, will no longer be able to sustain the judgments which Daniels's theory uses it to reach, in the end, I offer Daniels an olive branch by briefly sketching an alternative strategy for reaching suitably objective conclusions regarding the health and/or disease status of various conditions.

Ancillary