Funding sources None.
The n- vs. u-serration is a learnable criterion to differentiate pemphigoid from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita in direct immunofluorescence serration pattern analysis
Version of Record online: 8 JUL 2013
© 2013 The Authors BJD © 2013 British Association of Dermatologists
British Journal of Dermatology
Volume 169, Issue 1, pages 100–105, July 2013
How to Cite
Terra, J.B., Meijer, J.M., Jonkman, M.F. and Diercks, G.F.H. (2013), The n- vs. u-serration is a learnable criterion to differentiate pemphigoid from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita in direct immunofluorescence serration pattern analysis. British Journal of Dermatology, 169: 100–105. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12308
Conflicts of interest None declared.
- Issue online: 8 JUL 2013
- Version of Record online: 8 JUL 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 13 MAR 2013 11:07AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 MAR 2013
Serration pattern analysis of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) allows the differentiation of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other subtypes of pemphigoid. In daily practice its use is limited due to lack of experience and unfamiliarity.
To test the learnability of DIF serrated-pattern recognition in groups with various a priori levels of competence.
An online nversusu-test (www.nversusu.umcg.nl) was created, which contained 26 DIF images of the epidermal basement membrane zone, IgG stained and photographed with a magnification of × 40 and × 63. All images represented patients with a form of subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease. Thirteen DIF images were presented before and 13 DIF images after an instruction video about n- and u-serrated patterns. There were three options to choose from: n-serrated, u-serrated or undetermined. The test was completed by three groups of professionals: dermatology residents in training at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), international experts on bullous diseases, and dermatologists and pathologists who had participated in the Groningen blistering course during the past 10 years.
The overall number of correct answers of serration patterns was significantly higher after instruction than before instruction (median 9·0 correct answers vs. 11·0 correct answers, P < 0·001). Participants showed a mean improvement after instruction of 15·4% in the UMCG group (66·7% vs. 82·1%), 16·2% in the international expert group (67·2% vs. 83·4%) and 12·1% in the blistering course group (60·7% vs. 72·8%). The u-serrated pattern was better recognized than the n-serrated pattern.
Serration pattern analysis by DIF can be learned irrespective of background of expertise.