Patient satisfaction with treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in clinical practice

Authors

  • K. Callis Duffin,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, 4A330 School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • H. Yeung,

    1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. Takeshita,

    1. Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A
    2. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • G.G. Krueger,

    1. Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, 4A330 School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A.D. Robertson,

    1. National Psoriasis Foundation, Portland, OR 97223, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A.B. Troxel,

    1. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
    2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • D.B. Shin,

    1. Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A
    2. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
    3. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A.S. Van Voorhees,

    1. Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J.M. Gelfand

    1. Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A
    2. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author

  • K.C.D. and H.Y. are joint first authors and contributed equally to this manuscript.
  • Funding sources This study was supported by grants 1KM1CA156723 (K.C.D.), T32-AR07465 (H.Y., D.B.S.) and T32-GM075766-6 (J.T.) from the National Institutes of Health; a National Psoriasis Foundation Fellowship Award (J.T.); grants RC1-AR058204 and K24-AR064310 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (J.M.G.), and an unrestricted grant from Eli Lilly.
  • Conflicts of interest Statements are listed in the Appendix

Summary

Background

Treatment satisfaction among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis has not been studied and compared across treatments using a validated instrument.

Objectives

To assess patient-reported satisfaction with systemic and phototherapy treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in clinical practice and to correlate satisfaction with disease severity and quality-of-life measures.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 1182 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the Dermatology Clinical Effectiveness Research Network in the U.S.A. Patients receiving either topical therapies only; monotherapy with oral systemic therapies, biologics or narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy; or combination therapy with biologics and methotrexate completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II.

Results

Median unadjusted overall satisfaction scores were highest for patients receiving biologic monotherapies, biologic–methotrexate combinations, or phototherapy (83·3); scores were lowest for those receiving topical therapies only or acitretin (66·7). In fully adjusted models, compared with patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy, those receiving adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, phototherapy or adalimumab with methotrexate had significantly higher median overall satisfaction scores by 7·2–8·3 points, while those receiving topical therapies only had significantly lower overall satisfaction by 8·9 points. Adjusted convenience scores were lowest for patients receiving topical therapies only or infliximab. Modest but significant correlations were found between the overall satisfaction subscale and both the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (ρ = −0·36, < 0·001) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (ρ = −0·47, < 0·001).

Conclusions

Discernible differences were found in treatment satisfaction among therapies, particularly regarding treatment effectiveness and convenience. Further application of treatment satisfaction measures may inform treatment decisions and guideline development.

Ancillary