SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abran, A., Khelifi, A., Suryn, W. & Seffah, A. (2003). Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Software Quality Journal, 11, 325338.
  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T. & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 574594.
  • Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan , B. Thomas , B. A. Weerdmeester & I. L. McClelland (Eds), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189194). London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Bygstad, B., Ghinea, G. & Brevik, E. (2008). Software development methods and usability: perspectives from a survey in the software industry in Norway. Interacting with Computers, 20, 375385.
  • Chumley-Jones, H. S., Dobbie, A. & Alford, C. L. (2002). Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Academic Medicine, 77, S86S93.
  • Cook, D. A., Levinson, A. J., Garside, S., Dupras, D. M., Erwin, P. J. & Montori, V. M. (2008). Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, 11811196.
  • Cook, D. A. & Triola, M. M. (2009). Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Medical Education, 43, 303311.
  • Davids, M. R., Chikte, U. M. E. & Halperin, M. L. (2011). Development and evaluation of a multimedia e-learning resource for electrolyte and acid-base disorders. Advances in Physiology Education, 35, 295306.
  • Dawson-Saunders, B., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L. & Steward, D. E. (1990). A survey of medical school teachers to identify basic biomedical concepts medical students should understand. Academic Medicine, 65, 448454.
  • Dumas, J. S. & Salzman, M. C. (2006). Usability assessment methods. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2, 109140.
  • Dyson, M. C. & Campello, S. B. (2003). Evaluating virtual learning environments: what are we measuring. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 1, 1120.
  • Ellaway, R. & Masters, K. (2008). AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher, 30, 455473.
  • Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 379383.
  • Gould, J. D. & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28, 300311.
  • Hansen, M. M. (2008). Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e26.
  • Holzinger, A., Errath, M., Searle, G., Thurnher, B. & Slany, W. (2005). From extreme programming and usability engineering to extreme usability in software engineering education (XP+ UE[RIGHTWARDS ARROW] XU). Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05) (pp. 169172). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
  • Howarth, J., Andre, T. S. & Hartson, R. (2007). A structured process for transforming usability data into usability information. Journal of Usability Studies, 3, 723.
  • Huang, G., Reynolds, R. & Candler, C. (2007). Virtual patient simulation at U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Academic Medicine, 82, 446451.
  • Karat, C.-M., Campbell, R. & Fiegel, T. (1992). Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (pp. 397404). Monterey, California, USA, ACM.
  • Krug, S. (2006). Don't make me think! A common sense approach to Web usability. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
  • Mao, J. Y., Vredenburg, K., Smith, P. W. & Carey, T. (2005). The state of user-centered design practice. Communications of the ACM, 48, 105109.
  • Marcus, A. (2005). User interface design's return on investment: examples and statistics. In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds), Cost-Justifying usability: an update for the internet age (2nd ed.). (pp. 1739). San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
  • Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 4352.
  • Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proceedings of the 1992 SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 373380). Monterey, CA: ACM.
  • Nielsen, J. (1997). Severity ratings for usability problems. Retrieved 2011/09/07, from http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/severityrating.html
  • Nielsen, J. (2005). Ten usability heuristics. Retrieved 31/08/2012, from http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html
  • Nielsen, J. (2009). Discount usability: 20 years. Retrieved 28/08/2012, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/discount-usability.html
  • Nielsen, J. (2012). How many test users in a usability study? Retrieved 28 August 2012, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/number-of-test-users.html
  • Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out examples principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J. A. & Humburg, J. (2000). A toolkit for strategic usability: results from workshops, panels, and surveys. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 337344). The Hague, The Netherlands: ACM.
  • Sandars, J. (2010). The importance of usability testing to allow e-learning to reach its potential for medical education. Education for Primary Care, 21, 68.
  • Sandars, J. & Lafferty, N. (2010). Twelve Tips on usability testing to develop effective e-learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 32, 956960.
  • Snyder, C. (2003). Paper prototyping: the fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Sohaib, O. & Khan, K. (2010). Integrating usability engineering and agile software development: a literature review. International Conference on Computer Design and Applications (pp. 3238).
  • Spool, J. & Schroeder, W. (2001). Testing web sites: five users is nowhere near enough. Proceedings of the CHI 2001 conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 285286). Seattle, Washington: ACM.
  • Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123138.
  • Turner, C. W., Lewis, J. R. & Nielsen, J. (2006). Determining usability test sample size. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (2nd ed.). (pp. 30843088). Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
  • van Merrienboer, J. J. & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44, 8593.
  • Zaharias, P. (2009). Usability in the context of e-learning. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 5, 3759.