You have free access to this content

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Cover image for Vol. 120 Issue 10

September 2013

Volume 120, Issue 10

Pages i–ii, 1163–1302

  1. BJOG Editor's Choice

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      BJOG Editor's Choice (pages i–ii)

      Michael S Marsh

      Version of Record online: 13 AUG 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12424

  2. Insights from outside BJOG

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Insights from outside BJOG (pages 1163–1167)

      Athol Kent, Shona Kirtley and John Thorp

      Version of Record online: 13 AUG 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12423

  3. Commentary

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Does screening for pre-eclampsia make sense? (pages 1168–1170)

      C Hyde and S Thornton

      Version of Record online: 13 AUG 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12309

  4. Systematic review

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
  5. Basic science

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Can changes in angiogenic biomarkers between the first and second trimesters of pregnancy predict development of pre-eclampsia in a low-risk nulliparous patient population? (pages 1183–1191)

      L Myatt, RG Clifton, JM Roberts, CY Spong, RJ Wapner, JM Thorp Jr, BM Mercer, AM Peaceman, SM Ramin, MW Carpenter, A Sciscione, JE Tolosa, G Saade, Y Sorokin, GD Anderson and for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network

      Version of Record online: 18 JAN 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12128

    2. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
      Haptoglobin phenotype, pre-eclampsia, and response to supplementation with vitamins C and E in pregnant women with type-1 diabetes (pages 1192–1199)

      TL Weissgerber, RE Gandley, JM Roberts, CC Patterson, VA Holmes, IS Young, DR McCance and the Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial Study Group

      Version of Record online: 30 MAY 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12288

  6. Epidemiology

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
  7. Fetal medicine

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Angiogenic factors combined with clinical risk factors to predict preterm pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: a predictive test accuracy study (pages 1215–1223)

      JE Myers, LC Kenny, LME McCowan, EHY Chan, GA Dekker, L Poston, NAB Simpson, RA North and on behalf of the SCOPE consortium

      Version of Record online: 21 MAR 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12195

    2. You have free access to this content
      Cost and resource implications with serum angiogenic factor estimation in the triage of pre-eclampsia (pages 1224–1232)

      WT Schnettler, D Dukhovny, J Wenger, S Salahuddin, SJ Ralston and S Rana

      Version of Record online: 7 MAY 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12259

  8. General gynaecology

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Impact of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on HIV-1 genital shedding: a prospective cohort study (pages 1233–1239)

      MJ Huchko, VG Woo, T Liegler, H Leslie, K Smith-McCune, GF Sawaya, EA Bukusi and CR Cohen

      Version of Record online: 7 MAY 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12258

  9. General obstetrics

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
      Hypnosis Antenatal Training for Childbirth: a randomised controlled trial (pages 1248–1259)

      AM Cyna, CA Crowther, JS Robinson, MI Andrew, G Antoniou and P Baghurst

      Version of Record online: 3 JUL 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12320

  10. Gynaecological oncology

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study (pages 1260–1268)

      M Zorzi, A Del Mistro, A Farruggio, L de' Bartolomeis, H Frayle-Salamanca, L Baboci, A Bertazzo, P Cocco, C Fedato, M Gennaro, N Marchi, MG Penon, C Cogo and A Ferro

      Version of Record online: 21 JUN 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12272

  11. Gynaecological surgery

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Antibiotic prophylaxis for hysterectomy, a prospective cohort study: cefuroxime, metronidazole, or both? (pages 1269–1276)

      THI Brummer, A-M Heikkinen, J Jalkanen, J Fraser, J Mäkinen, E Tomás, T Seppälä, J Sjöberg and P Härkki

      Version of Record online: 21 JUN 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12178

  12. Intrapartum care

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
  13. Surgical technique

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Ultrasound-guided transcervical forceps extraction of unruptured interstitial pregnancy (pages 1285–1288)

      J-W Ahn, S-J Lee, SH Lee, SP Kang and H-S Won

      Version of Record online: 20 MAY 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12265

  14. Urogynaecology

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
  15. BJOG Exchange

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
    2. You have free access to this content
    3. You have free access to this content
      Lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer – an overrated procedure? (pages 1297–1298)

      J Dietl, J Wischhusen and SFM Häusler

      Version of Record online: 13 AUG 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12358

    4. You have free access to this content
    5. You have free access to this content
    6. You have free access to this content
    7. You have free access to this content
  16. Erratum

    1. Top of page
    2. BJOG Editor's Choice
    3. Insights from outside BJOG
    4. Commentary
    5. Systematic review
    6. Basic science
    7. Epidemiology
    8. Fetal medicine
    9. General gynaecology
    10. General obstetrics
    11. Gynaecological oncology
    12. Gynaecological surgery
    13. Intrapartum care
    14. Surgical technique
    15. Urogynaecology
    16. BJOG Exchange
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Erratum (page 1302)

      Version of Record online: 13 AUG 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12419

      This article corrects:

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION