Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence?
Article first published online: 20 FEB 2013
© 2013 BJU International
Volume 112, Issue 4, pages E344–E350, August 2013
How to Cite
Serati, M., Cattoni, E., Siesto, G., Braga, A., Sorice, P., Cantaluppi, S., Cromi, A., Ghezzi, F., Vitobello, D., Bolis, P. and Salvatore, S. (2013), Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence?. BJU International, 112: E344–E350. doi: 10.1111/bju.12007
- Issue published online: 23 JUL 2013
- Article first published online: 20 FEB 2013
- 1Recommendation of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and Faecal incontinence. In Abrams P , Cardozo L , Khoury S , Wein A eds, Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris: Health Pubblication Ltd, 2009: 1787, , et al.
- 6Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 288–308, , et al.
- 16Women with pure stress urinary incontinence symptoms assessed by the initial standard evaluation including measurement of post-void residual volume and a stress test: are urodynamic studies still needed? Neurourol Urodyn 2012; 31: 508–512, , et al.